• spooky2092
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    What’s your threshold of ‘in mass’? Because it was 1/9 recent college graduates working low wage jobs as of mid-2023.

    In June 2023, about 11.2 percent of recent college graduates were working in low-wage jobs in the United States. This is a slight increase from June 2021, when 10.8 percent of recent college graduates were working low-wage jobs.

    The Federal Reserve Bank of New York classifies low-wage jobs as those that tend to pay around 25,000 U.S. dollars or less. Recent college graduates are defined as those aged 22 to 27 with a bachelor’s degree or higher and not enrolled in further study.

    11% of recent graduates with degrees working low wage jobs feels like they’re actually working these roles en masse after all.

    • rowdyrockets@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      11% is certainly not nothing, but the vast majority are not working these jobs.

      I’m not really sure how you can look at 11% and say “yes, they are working these jobs en masse”. A bit disingenuous.

      Edit: Post OP and others continue to downvote - yet can’t counter. I’m sorry college didn’t have the outcome you expected, it’s definitely no longer the golden ticket it once was. But to claim it isn’t a benefit at all, or indicate that most college grads are unable to use their degrees is at best misleading and at worst disinformation. There are a lot of variables, including the major you choose, and how much you spend to complete the degree.

      • bitcrafter@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Post OP and others continue to downvote - yet can’t counter.

        Personally, I was turned off by you saying that the other commenter was being “A bit disingenuous.” just because you disagreed with them, despite the fact that I otherwise agree with your point.

        • rowdyrockets@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I stand by that. It is a bit disingenuous (purposefully or ignorantly) to call 11% “en masse”.

            • rowdyrockets@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I don’t attribute it to malice. A misleading claim is just that, misleading, whatever their intentions.

              It’s alright if we disagree.

              • bitcrafter@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                The problem is that the word “disingenuous” does not mean “misleading”, it means “insincere”. So when you say that someone is being “a bit disingenuous”, you are necessarily commenting on their character, not just their claim.