• besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    4 days ago

    So how close can you get your eyeballs to the sensor? Even if IR isn’t in the visible spectrum, that doesn’t mean it can’t damage your eyes at high power levels. If anything, its more dangerous because you won’t notice it.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Cameras have an IR blocking filter and it still damaged the sensor. I don’t know how they can consider it eye safe. I wouldn’t want to be close to one.

      • macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Most cameras do not have IR blocking. This is how you are able to see IR LEDS with your phone, including remote control LEDS and security cameras with night vision.

        Also, infrared is very safe and you are spreading disinformation.

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Every normal color camera has an IR filter. If they did not, the photos would be pink in sunlight. Some IR gets though the filter allowing you to see IR LEDs, but it’s significantly attenuated.

  • irotsoma
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    So will it burn out all the cameras in Teslas’ “self driving” systems, too?

      • irotsoma
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’d guess those are too far away for the filters to be ineffective, unless they don’t have the proper filters on them, which is definitely possible considering how bad most of the tech they use is. Of course, same with Teslas. I bet they don’t have proper filtering on their cameras either. Lol

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    I always wanted a car with a built in laser blaster. It’s one firmware update away from accepting targeting commands

  • Drigo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    The company specifically called out “close-ups” as the problem, meaning that our phones should be safe with distant shots

    Also I think they’re using lidar with a frequency of 1550 nanometer which can’t penetrate the eye or cause damage.

  • Whats_a_lemmy@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Do not point a camera directly at the lidar,” one support page admonishes in no uncertain terms.

    Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball

  • SW42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Good. I need one of those and make it wearable for the people wearing smart glasses.