Last year, the rightwing think-tank the Heritage Foundation launched Project 2025, which laid out much of the policy blueprint for the current Trump administration. One of the project’s espoused goals was to permanently criminalize all pornography. Now, a Republican senator with kind words for Trump has introduced a bill that would do just that.

Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) recently introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), which would effectively criminalize all pornography nationwide by legally redefining what it means to be obscene. For years, “obscenity” has been all but a defunct legal category that narrowly defines speech that remains unprotected by the First Amendment. Lee would explode this legal category, expanding it to encompass virtually all visual representations of sex.

  • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I’m not personally concerned about them banning actual porn, I’m more concerned about the part of the plan where they’re going to classify LGBT media as porn and ban it.

    A lot of great content will either be pulled from streaming or heavily edited. Agatha All Along, one of the best Marvel shows, will be on the chopping block. And so will innocent preschool shows like Young Jedi Adventures because it features lesbian parents.

  • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Anyone want to put a wager on how long before Mike Lee is discovered with some really kinky and/or illegal media on his personal device(s)?

  • lone_faerie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Just a reminder, these people consider trans people existing pornography

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This reminds me of that Willy Shakespeare quote (paraphrased)…“Me thinks he protesteth too much!”.

    • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      24 hours ago

      She had an Einstein visa, so the nude pictures count as art. Any accompanying prostitution would be considered performance art.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    The porn lobby is going to fuck this guy over.

    Edit: they may even make some art out of it.

    • fnrir
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The classic rethorical strategy of drawing your opponent as pregnant.

  • slickgoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    If there is one single thing that will doom this government, it is trying to ban porn.

    Weird, but true.

  • ghostlychonk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    1 day ago

    This man’s search history and hard drive are littered with some vile, vile things I’d bet.

  • xyzzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Most of what they do is in service to white supremacy, including this.

    • Abortion restrictions: more white babies
    • Pornography restrictions: more white babies
    • Immigration restrictions: fewer brown babies

    Make America Great Again literally just means “restoring” the “supremacy” of the white race and culture over all others.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I don’t see how the first two would increase the number of white babies proportionally to the rest of the babies being born. As far as I’m aware, the states with abortion restrictions have higher % black populations than the other states, for instance.

      • xyzzy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Edit for drive-by down voters: I’m saying this is what they believe, not that it’s true or I believe it. I mean, all I’m talking about is the “Great Replacement” theory that people like Stephen Miller fully adhere to.


        It’s pretty simple: the white population is losing ground relative to non-white populations. Yes, other populations will increase, but there’s a practical ceiling. They likely believe that the white population gains will more than offset any gains by other ethnicities.

        For black populations specifically, I’d have to do some simple analysis on this data, but it doesn’t look particularly disproportionate in absolute numbers.

        But really, I don’t believe the black population is the principal target. See the graph. Consider the immigration policy.

        Population growth by ethnicity

        https://www.brookings.edu/articles/all-recent-us-population-growth-comes-from-people-of-color-new-census-estimates-show/

          • xyzzy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I mean, obviously. I’m not saying I believe it or that it’s viable.

        • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          most populations around the world are slowing in growth, plateauing, or declining. Seems as people become wealthier, and more educated, very young people begin having less/no kids, for the most part, and this lack of teen births is what is largely being lost when we see these declines.

          • RedPostItNote@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Yeah, when people have educations they know the planet is fucked. Lmao at thinking it’s “money and education” that means less kids. It’s happening because the world is bad and the earth is fucked. Making it more complicated is hilarious

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Sadly put them in jail, deport, provide inferior medical aid by capitalism means is the traditional answer.

  • Jessica
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Well, there are PLENTY of porn sites that are not based in the US, as well as PLENTY of VPN providers that are euro based. Good luck with all of that. Those that want to watch porn, will just become slightly more tech literate.

  • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    As long as prosecution for politicians caught in motel rooms with twinks and meth applies to them, also.

      • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        As much of horndog as Gaetz was, I have no problem believing he had some twinks, too.

        Nothing wrong with that sexually, but his constituents wouldn’t like it…