• InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because they are? A lot of places don’t offer sick leave anymore. Sick days, bereavement days, vacation days, all come from the source. It’s really only Millenials and older who get sick days.

      • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Kind of a nothingburger comment but until i saw your comment i didn’t even realise that was possible. The fact this is acceptable, or even legal in the united states is absurd

        • InputZero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah fortunately I don’t work there anymore and work someplace that respects it’s workers. Took a lot of time, luck, trial and error to get where I am now.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Millennial here. Every office job I have worked has either had unlimited sick time or unlimited vacation. (Hourly contracting roles aside.)

      • wieson@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Damn. I was wondering why nobody mentioned it, but it is so normal to you (plural), that you don’t bother.

        That’s crazy. For me it’s an absolute affront to even suggest I should give up vacation days for being sick. In my country Germany (and probably all of Europe, maybe also Asia) you get a slip from your doctor and you stay home till you’re better.

        Paid. And nobody touches your vacation days. I’m just speechless.

      • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I remember my company did this. We started with one week vacation, one week sick and they just made it two weeks pto one day

  • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Outcomes matter. Splitting hairs about how someone drafts an email is infantile.

    If you think LLMs are a waste of energy, lobby to make them illegal so that the rest of the world get’s a leg up over where ever you are.

    • petrol_sniff_king
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Exactly. Over Mother’s day, I had chatgpt take her out on a mother date of fun and… you know, whatever else. I dunno I wasn’t there. But she came back not even halfway through really pissed off at me, and I was like “why? what is the problem? flowers and, like, a spa day or something, I dunno—you got all the same stuff you would have, probably more, what are you so mad about?” Some people, man.

  • i_ben_fine@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    lemmy dot world was a bad choice for this post. Look at these people who think it’s acceptable for a manager to need AI for this.

  • tauren@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    got their sick leave approved

    still unhappy

    🤷‍♂️

      • MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes. We know that. Some of us Americans have been trying to tell the whole world how bad it is here for a very long time. Lobby for the U.N. to send the blue hats to help us if you actually care

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      18 hours ago

      could have just said, “sure, take the time you need.”

      instead of wasting 5 minutes and burning down a tree and a half.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Especially since the prompt couldn’t have been all that much shorter. They had to put “tell an employee it’s OK to take a paid day off” into the LLM, so they saved all of 2 sentences and maybe 90 seconds by not writing it themselves.

        • petrol_sniff_king
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Ah, but didn’t you see how flowery and professional the result sounded? People like flowery, two-faced corporate lingo.

        • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Opening chatgpt, copy pasting the answer into the email client probably took them as long as it would have just typing: “It’s ok you dont need approval for when you are sick, get well soon”

      • tauren@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Oh no, somebody did something you wouldn’t do, will you ever recover? 😱

  • 5in1k@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    They took the time to find nice words however they came about them. I’m sure your boss is busy.

    • petrol_sniff_king
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Except they didn’t, actually. They saved time by not having to find them.

      I’m sure they’re not an asshole, but they’re not considerate, either.

  • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    At least they approved paid time off. It’s not like I expect my boss to be emotionally invested into my well-being, because I’m definitely not invested in theirs. I’m just here for the money.

  • will@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 day ago

    You don’t know- maybe the boss has trouble reading people and legitimately wants to know if their tone is appropriate from the employee’s perspective?

    Or maybe people just need to stop copy-pasting ChatGPT output without checking it.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That’s fine. I do that often. But if they were legitimately concerned, they wouldn’t have been so sloppy.

    • TheAlbatross
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      1 day ago

      Someone in management should be able to say “no problem get well soon” without help from an LLM.

      • RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s literally the job of a manager to look out for the employees they manage in order to foster a positive work environment. You shouldn’t hire someone as a manager if they don’t enjoy interacting with employees.

    • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not that fucking hard to write a couple words.

      Why the need for a paragraph. Most people being sick don’t want to read all them words.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        >35 words

        >average reading speed is about 200 wpm

        >approximately 10.5 seconds of reading

        >all them words

        Profound laziness and inattention like this is exactly the type of attitude that makes people think LLM slop is acceptable. We are so fucking cooked; holy shit. Concision might be better in this specific case, but act like an adult.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Most people being sick don’t want to read all them words.

          People can be as lazy as they fucking want to be when they are sick. You know, feeling shitty enough that they aren’t able to work?

          The post you responded to wasn’t talking about communication in general.

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Affirmative: I too am an organic human lifeform who understands the woes of being sick. beep boop And to that I say: Literally. Ten. Seconds. Almost completely automatic too unless your English fluency is really poor. Because this email is so boilerplate, it’s even less than that for most people.

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              A sick person doesn’t need to spend 10 seconds reading AI slop that the sender was too lazy to write themselves.

              • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                We both agree the AI slop is bad. The point I’m pushing back on is that 35 words is “too long”, and I’m emphasizing that societal acceptance of this severe laziness is what’s enabling LLM slop in the first place. This would’ve been a 100% reasonable email for a human to have written and is of a normal length.

  • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    I guess I don’t have a problem with this.
    I struggle to write emails and would potentially use an LLM if that were an option. (Maybe.)

    The message accepted the request, and was polite, showing concern, even. I assume it was proofread and deemed acceptable to the boss/reflective of their sentiments (although perhaps not copied well).

    I guess I don’t see the offense here. Anyone who does see it care to explain why this is a negative?

    • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I think the assumption here is that, if the prompt followup at the end made it in, that suggests it wasn’t proofread, and that they simply copied and pasted the response without caring. If that’s true, then yeah, that’s a little bit offensive. Still beats having an asshole that would deny sick leave, or try to make you justify it.

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yeah. I’ve been trying to ‘pick my battles’ more carefully, as it were.
        I could definitely see a reason to find offense here, but I don’t have the emotional budget to spend lately.

        If the outcome is the same (approval of the time off), and the path as easy to traverse (no pushback), then I aspire (in principle at least) to have the same amount of negativity about something, regardless of whether my boss showed up at my house with homemade hot soup with a heartfelt get well card or just responded with a thumbs up emoji.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s probably offensive because that AI footer text was copied into the email, letting the (sick) recipient know it was AI-generated, not genuinely from the sender.

    • 5in1k@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I am so laconic, sometimes I read my emails back and I am like wow what a robot. So I get humaning it up with a fake human.

    • mishielda1234@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Using an LLM is less of an issue than how it was used. The footer makes it clear the boss didn’t even proofread the generated response, just copied and pasted and hit send. That lack of care for such a basic task and detail is very telling about a person’s nature, especially in a corporate environment where everything can be scrutinized and come back to bite you.

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Perhaps my understanding of how these are used is incorrect.

        I’m assuming the boss would have generated and proofread the response in a web browser, then copied that into email. Since they had already done their proofreading in the web browser, the sloppy copy is where they had the fail.
        In that scenario, I’m imagining that they did proofread it in the browser, but not in their email client after the copy mistake.

        Hm. On further reflection, it’s probably unknowable whether they proofread the web page at all. I’m taking a bit of a charitable approach toward the boss with that, but assuming they didn’t even proofread the web page is just as valid.

        • mishielda1234@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah exactly, I can’t say whether they looked over it before or just did a bad job copying, but there was still an opportunity to fix it after that.

          From my perspective, regardless of what goes into a work email, I’m giving it one last look over before I actually hit the send button

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah I find that LLMs are good for producing things when I’m unable to properly choose the right words.

      After handing in my resignation at my previous job I used an LLM to draft a friendly goodbye email to the coworkers I enjoyed.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Eh, at least they’re trying. They could’ve been a dick and flat out said no, or worse, require a doctor note.