• MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    9 days ago

    Hilarious to call the pope Marxist. Wasn’t it Marx who called religion the opiate of the masses? Few communist countries tolerate religion much at all.

      • FrChazzz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yeah, there’s a BUNCH of Latin American Catholics that would read “Marxism = anti-religion” as news to them. (See: Liberation Theology)

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      He didn’t say that as a bad thing.

      The Communist Manifesto spends time talking about how compatible early Christian teachings are with Marx’s goals.

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 days ago

      As with the “abolition of private property” people quotes what’s convenient. The whole quote goes:

      Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.

  • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Ugh us Americans from the USA don’t seem to understand how arrogant it is to say he’s the first American pope. Argentina is in South America. This guy is the first North American pope, or better yet the first pope from the United States. This is going to bug the shit out of me.

    Edit: Because I’m genuinely loving the downvotes (you really felt it when I called you arrogant, huh), if the next US president was from North Dakota, we wouldn’t say they were the first president from Dakota, would we?

    • Nay@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      9 days ago

      I fully get the criticism, but US Americans are the only ones that identify, and are broadly known as “Americans,” so it just feels pedantic to me.

      • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s definitely pedantic, but I’ve had more than one friend from countries in Central and South America comment on it, so it’s not just me noticing.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 days ago

          Interesting that you chose to identify your friends as “from countries in central in South America “instead of just calling them, Americans.

          • entwine413@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            9 days ago

            Not really since their continent of origin is directly relevant to the discussion of the scope of the term ‘American’.

        • Nay@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 days ago

          Pedants have pedant friends? Not trying to be an ass, but it just seems like such a meaningless distinction to make… Why is it worth it?

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Because American cultural imperialism sucks for lots of reasons, and it’s worth pushing back against it

            • Nay@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 days ago

              It’s literally part of the name and the most sensible shorthand, by which virtually no one is confused.

              But fight your fight, I guess.

    • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I mean… I don’t disagree, but no other nation put “America” in their name. “United” and “States” are even more generic. Heck, “United States” isn’t even distinctive.

      • “Uni” is already “university”,
      • “Statist” is already something else
      • Statian / station
      • Stater / stator
      • Unitian / munition
      • “Unitarian” is already something
      • Unit 👎
      • Unish 👎
      • Ustan / Houston
      • UnStan, UnStian, UniStan, UniStAm👎
      • “Yank(ee)” is almost exclusively derogatory, and a fair chunk of the nation uses it to denigrate a different chunk.
      • “Yu-ess-ee-an” is just unbelievably awful
      • Usonian” didn’t take off, but we could give it another go 🤷‍♂️
  • cjk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    9 days ago

    Why seem Americans to call everybody Marxist they don’t like?

    I don’t want to troll, I am really interested in an answer.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 days ago

      A Red Scare is a form of moral panic provoked by fear of the rise of left-wing ideologies in a society, especially communism and socialism. Historically, red scares have led to mass political persecution, scapegoating, and the ousting of those in government positions who have had connections with left-wing movements.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Scare

      It’s just a boogeyman word to make them sound scary. Laura Loomer literally does not know what marxist means beyond “communism”. In fact, she doesn’t even know what communism is, she has just been told it’s bad.

        • lemonaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 days ago

          She was briefly on Trump’s plane. Around the debate with Harris. It’s likely he took the “eating the pets” line from her, since that was a rumor spread in nazi circles, particularly on Gab.

          It’s also possible they had an affair during that time. MTG got really angry with Loomer and they started trashing each other on Twitter for all to see. It was glorious.

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 days ago

    If Loomer hates the new pope, that’s the only endorsement I need to hear!

  • prole
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    9 days ago

    Oh cool, glad to know these people hate him. That’s a good sign to me.

    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 days ago

      Fucking high praise and a strong endorsement right there.

      Heh, instead of the college of Cardinals, they should have just sent a list to trump and picked the one he ranted on the longest.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Jesus is NOT alright with Republicans.

    Not the Jesus of the New Testament going by his teachings, and not the Jesus that literally labors for the very food the raging hypocrites eat.

    Atheists like myself at least don’t care about Jesus Christ. But as someone raised Roman Catholic, with a grandmother that recognized the benevolent teachings of the New Testament, I can verify one of the Republican’s apparently ridiculous claims is absolutely true:

    There is absolutely a war inside America against Christianity.

    Republicans are the ones waging it though, as they worship a gold plated nepo slumlord gameshow host idol no less.

  • stickly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 days ago

    Marxist puppet? Are these “Marxists” in the room with you right now?

    Who would be pulling the strings for Marxists in 2025? Uh… Cuba? Lemmy.ml? Lenin reanimated as a Communist Lich King?

  • Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 days ago

    MAGA are demonic. They are literally driven by hatred and evil, and those that lead them pray only to money.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      While that certainly doesn’t speak well for him, wouldn’t it be more of a surprise at this point if they chose a pope that couldn’t be described that way? This is the catholic church we’re talking about.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 days ago

        That is precisely why I chose the phrase “standard issue.” Anyone who thinks the Catholic Church is going to change in any dramatic way is being foolish.

  • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 days ago

    I understand now!

    As a cardinal, he was fine.

    But when a cardinal becomes Pope, he dies and also goes woke.

    Now, we can remember his name.

    His name… Is Robert Prevost.

    His name is Robert Prevost!

    • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      The problem is that many of the Christians in the US aren’t Catholic. Thus, it probably won’t help if the pope excommunicated them.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    I wonder what kind of pizza he prefers. It would be funny if chicago pizza caused a schism in the church.