• Kwakigra@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m interested in how this could be framed as Manuel having an unfair advantage, but since I know any explanation no matter how stupid, impossible, or absurd would work on millions of credulous morons I actually don’t.

    • raccoona_nongrata@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “He HaS tOo mUcH tEsToStErOnE! He’S bAsIcaLly dOpIng” or something like that would be my guess.

      Same basic dumb logic for why it’s ok for a cis woman to be tall and not a trans one.

      • Pitri
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        yeah, I’ve seen the argument. people cry out because testosterone is (deservedly) considered essential for ftm trans people, while in most sports, it would be considered doping for cis people.

        while I can see why people feel like it’s unfair treatment, they usually have no idea about the trans experience. excluding trans people from the opportunity to have a sports carreer would in any case be a lot more unfair than some selectively allowed hormones for athletes.

        • AceProgrammer42
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t see how it would be unfair as long as his testosterone levels are within average the male range.

    • Veloxization@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      It would be kinda funny if the argument went to trans men having an unfair advantage when previously the argument was: “Show me even one trans man who has won against cis men.” Goal posts are ever moving.