• ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    They already stripped and/or barred Russians from becoming citizens a few years back, so this kind of follows that trajectory.

    The argument from Lithuania as I understand it that purging Russians reduces the ‘protecting Russians abroad’ narrative from Putin. Though it does mean one less place where Russians who oppose Putin can go while also displacing potentially thousands of Russians into Putin’s other narrative that western/NATO powers are out to get them.

    Hope this maneuver pays off, I guess.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bravo Lithuania! The rest of the EU and ECC should do the same until Russia somehow becomes a normal country.

  • Commiunism@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    I dunno chat, as a Lithuanian (as if it matters) this feels like a bit of an over reach in a war on terror in US type of way. This isn’t the only law that explicitly targets Russians/Belarussians as a security threat that has been enacted.

    These people are often just nationals, citizens of their country and not automatically foreign agents. If they were here doing espionage, they would report back using encrypted channels on the internet which is much cheaper than traveling back and forth. If they were smuggling tools for terrorism like bombs, it’s much easier to smuggle them over the border or even obtain them locally than having the foreign agent themselves smuggle.

    I can’t help but view it as discriminatory in a similar way how Muslim and Arab populations were treated post-9/11, it just doesn’t make much sense unless I’m missing something.

    • FundMECFS
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Same. I’m in western europe, I have a couple friends who are Russian and oppose the invasion.

      The male ones haven’t gone back to see their family because they fear conscription.

      Those who can go back to see family are super cautious and scared because they don’t wanna be sent to gulag.

      It’d be a shame if they got another barrier to going home they had to worry about.

    • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Much cheaper, but not more secure.

      Excluding that, if my country had started a territorial way of aggression, and I was now living in a country that’s been threatened by said country in the recent past as well, I wouldn’t be traveling back, let alone often.

      Combined with actual continual examples of Russians not only spying but carrying out assassinations in foreign countries (like the UK) and sabotaging infrastructure almost every month, and if anything, this is pretty light retaliation.

      • Commiunism@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You personally wouldn’t travel back and forth, but this doesn’t necessarily apply to everyone - there were and still are a decent amount of Russian nationals working/living here with their families, distant or otherwise, still living back home in Russia/Belarus. No matter your nationality, you might want to go back to your home country and visit your family. What if there’s an emergency/funeral you have to attend after visiting? It might not be a valid reason to go back (given how vague the articles are), and you might lose your residence because of it. It’s only one example of course, but there definitely are more scenarios like this one.

        Also, reading one of the news articles, counter-terrorism prevention isn’t even mentioned once, and it wouldn’t make sense given how I already outlined how it would be easier to get tools for terrorism locally, much safely too given how you don’t have to go through security that scrutinizes you more due to war-time, not to mention it doesn’t prevent terrorism from foreign agents who don’t own a residence here. If anything, the article mentions how these methods are there to further sanction Russia, to show solidarity to Ukraine and “limit specific Russian/Belarusian citizen rights”.

        • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Those legit people can apply for citizenship.

          This is lithuania not russia. Russia needs to make living comfortable for russians, not lithuania. Lithuanias job is to provide security for it’s citizens and ensure the survival of lithuanian culture. There is citizenship for people who like that and want that, no matter what country you frequent.

          • Maxxie
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            You need 10 years of residence before you can apply, and from what I hear from friends it’s not a sure thing. So you may be stuck living as a resident for much longer than that.

            Is it fair to not being able to go see your relatives for years/decade+? I’d pay that price for getting out of russia (well I already am paying it, albeit not to Lithuania) doesn’t make it right tho.

            But then again, as long as ru/br immigrants are still able to enter, live and obtain citizenship, can’t really be mad at the baltics they’re in a tough position.

            • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Is it fair to not being able to go see your relatives for years/decade+?

              The article says no more then once every three months, how is this years/decades ?

              I’d be more worried about being detained on the Russian side.

              • Maxxie
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                Fair on both counts.

                I would not risk travelling to russia as a resident of its neighbor, both because russia can send you to jail/trench, and because your residency can be easily revoked/not extended. Permanently living somewhere as a non-citizen is a vulnerable position, and getting a citizenship is often outside your control.

            • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Its a bit rough but other than "stip zigzagging across rhe border constantly* it’s not a big deal and not a real restriction. I went home like twice a year when I lived abroad.

      • el_bhm@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ah yes. The country with a main channel having a programme that openly discusses nuking countries. With Meidviedev openly calling for annexation of baltic states. Beliteling other countries.

        Country that occupied a lot of Europe and denied independence

        Country that invaded Georgia.

        Country that annexed Crimea.

        Country that genocides Ukraine.

        Russophobia came out of nowhere.

        russia. The country that did nothing wrong.

        • Commiunism@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Pretty much, Russia has definitely earned the reputation even back when it was being “socialist” - it’s an imperialist hellhole, one that also meddles in today’s politics by funding far-right parties like AfD.

          Though, I personally take issue when the russophobia doesn’t stop at targeting the state and its ruling class who made these decisions, but to the Russian working class as well, all of whom are getting exploited in the standard capitalist fashion but also a section being conscripted to kill and die for their ruling class benefit and their imperialist interests. That’s why it doesn’t feel right to me when a country targets Russian nationals with discriminatory laws in a fashion that’s not too different from 9/11’s treatment of Arab people that most of us can agree was wrong.

  • TabbsTheBat@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 days ago

    As a lithuanian: woo! Yeah! That’s what we’re talking about, that’s what it’s all about! Woo! 🇱🇹🇱🇹🇱🇹

        • lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Targetting minorities is a fascist practice no matter what the excuse.

          Inaccurate, this is superseded by “Targeting fascists is always correct”

        • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s not a minorty when the countries had schools for russians, monuments celebrating russians killing lithuanians, entire communities who were brought in to replace genocided lithuanians and they now threaten every month to come back and genocide more lithuanians.

          This is survival. We were nice for 30 years and all it got us is “were going to kill every fucking last one of yo, again” from the neighbours we were nice to.

          But cry more how a dying culture of a million is facist for erasing russian culture by not giving special rights to its citizens who gained it theough occupation and crimes against humanity.