• spooky2092
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Boomer forgot how millennials are old enough to have had to have film developed.

  • Nangijala@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    18 hours ago

    When the fuck do we get to retire from the “young and stupid” category? I literally turn 36 today and my body cracks when I get up in the morning.

    Also, I had red eyes in most photos from my child- and teenhood. I spent a lot of money on film in my teens before I got my first phone with a proper camera in 2007.

    Next you’re gonna condescendingly explain what a floppy disc or a cassette tape is too? Even Gen z is old enough to know about those.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Right? Who made this? What millennial doesn’t remember red eye, it was in every damn photo when I was a kid and Im not a particularly old millennial.

  • MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    245
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Millennials are old enough to remember analog cameras and photos of people with red eyes. Man, people need to update their definition of which generation is “young.”

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      114
      ·
      1 day ago

      The oldest millennials are in their early 40s now but to boomers they will always be teens.

      • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Using the most common definition of those born 1981-1996: Oldest millennials turn 44 this year, youngest turn 29. Next year we’ll officially transition to “30s to mid 40s.”

      • Catoblepas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        It was so bad that the PC software that came with the camera often had a red eye removal feature. I remember being fascinated when I figured out you could use it on things other than eyes and it just took the red out of anything.

        • Hoimo@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Did it do some form of automatic eye detection or did you have to manually select the eyes?

          • Catoblepas
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You had to select the eyes. The software I remember had a little square box that popped up, and you moved it over the eyes and clicked to remove the red eye.

    • hoch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hell, even the older Gen-Z grew up with analog cameras, VHS players, paper maps, and no computers.

      I’m not sure people realize zoomers are almost 30, and millennials are nearing 50.

      • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Either way, I think we can agree that millennials know what film is. Many of us have even developed it ourselves. You know back when people were thought things other than app development and learned helplessness.

    • oppy1984@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Seriously, I remember taking a disposable camera with me on our school trip Washington. I also remember that it was during that trip that we all found out you could open those things up and turn them into mini tasers.

  • JPSound@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Mhhh… yes, we millenials who are approaching or are already in our 40s… what’s all that red eye stuff about?

  • nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    One thing I found interesting is!how red-eye reduction works - it pre-flashes you eye briefly, before the main flash. So your pupils constrict and light doesn’t reflect off the bottom of your eyes. Yes, you are part of the mechanism!

    Some strange kind of bio-mechanical symbiotic mechanism is that!

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      So that’s why the choice seems to be between red eyes or tiny pupils. I have some old photos where the surroundings look really dark, the flash on the people makes them look ghostly pale and everyone has unnaturally constricted pupils. If we were trying to avoid demonic pictures, I think we failed.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      But then your subjects relax their pose on the first flash and you have 1/2 the group start walking off by the time the 2nd one flashes.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Even beyond that the 1980s is like the start of millennials. I’d ask if this was made by LLMs but I’d expect even those to get something that dumb correct.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    Millennials are between 29 and 44. They are turning into the old generation.

    This meme feels like it is 10 or more years old.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    People call “millennials” young because they are old but too proud to say “teenagers”.

    Plus the generational infighting is what the ruling class will use to replace or supplement the culture war.

  • jedibob5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Wait, do digital cameras not do the red eye effect? Now that I think about it, I don’t think I’ve seen a photo with red eye in it in a long time, but I had always assumed that was a consequence of the camera flash, not the film…

    Edit: TIL that camera redeye does come from the flash, but it hasn’t been much of a thing these days because today’s phones/cameras adjust the flash timing to compensate. Thanks for the replies!

    • Rose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The red eye effect happens when flash reflects off the retina. Compact cameras (film and early digital) had flash very close to the lens, so there was a high chance of that happening.

      Not much of a chance these days, when most people take photos with cell phones, the cellphone cameras have adequate low light performance so you don’t need flash to begin with, and the “flash” is just an LED that isn’t as luminous as a real flash bulb.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hardly anyone takes photos with a flash anymore.
      Phones instead crank up the sensitivity and use AI to get rid of the noise (=draw an image that vaguely resembles what’s in front of the camera).

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        The sensors themselves are also slightly better than 20 years ago, much less 40. Meaning they can probably produce a nicer image before all the AI shit.

      • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh god , remember the anti red eye flash that strobed for a second before the flash?

        I still don’t understand how that worked. At the time I thought it was “getting your eyes used to the bright light so they wouldn’t turn red with the big flash,” but that definitely doesn’t make sense.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          I still don’t understand how that worked. At the time I thought it was “getting your eyes used to the bright light so they wouldn’t turn red with the big flash,” but that definitely doesn’t make sense.

          I understood it as the red eyes you see in photos is the wide open iris of an eye you’re photographing zooming in on the blood vessels in the back of the eye. Flashing bright light before the photo makes the iris of the person you’re photographing contract significantly, so you can’t see the blood vessels in the back of the eye anymore.

        • 0xSim@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well, that’s it. A first (few) flash(es) to contract your retina, and then the flash to take the picture.

      • jedibob5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Now that you mention it, I think you might be right… My memory’s not the best lol. From the other replies, it seems that the rarity of redeye these days comes from the timing of modern cameras’ flash, not whether or not it uses film.