Today the U.S. House of Representatives passed the TAKE IT DOWN Act, giving the powerful a dangerous new route to manipulate platforms into removing lawful speech that they simply don’t like. President Trump himself has said that he would use the law to censor his critics. The bill passed the Senate in February, and it now heads to the president’s desk.

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    This reminds me of the DNC super donor Ed Buck who would lure in gay black men and kill them by injecting meth into them while raping them.

    He managed to do it for years and wasn’t until one of the victims survived to be able talk about it that he was sentenced as with every previous body it was said it was a private issue and a sad loss of a friend.
    Photos managed to get shared of his racist, rape, death den helping sway the public.

    Ed Buck would have loved this bill and its ability to actively scrub his image further.
    If it feels like monsters would like something I don’t want it.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    American decline is happening at a much faster pace than I anticipated.

    If you don’t own a gun, now is the time.

  • thefluffiest@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    2 days ago

    Call it what it is: a censorship law. Apparently the climate of fear that makes people self-censor wasn’t enough.

    Watch for a LOT of ‘extreme left’ opinions get taken down and their authors imprisoned.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      It won’t stop with journalists and authors. They’ll be looking in Facebook posts, Reddit comments, Twitter threads, Instagram, etc. And random citizens are going to start disappearing.
      They’ll want people to know it can happen to anyone, not just the most visible or high profile critics.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        Fascism is an integration of government and corporations. Democrats are officially just the other side of the coin after this. 100% one party in the country. The longer any politician fights under the banner of Republican or Democrat the longer they want this system to continue.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Because the mainstream democrats (the corpocentrists, mostly) believe that the tools of fascism and oppression are perfectly fine to keep around as long as they’re wielded by enlightened leadership. All you have to do is simply never lose an election ever. Nbd. Why do they want to keep the tools of fascism around? Uh… (Hurriedly stuffing cash in pockets) Safety, terrorists or child molesters or something, look don’t worry about it.

      • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think because the sentiment of the bill is good.

        The problem is on the required action and the broad definition of what a “covered platform” is.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      So just assume they voted yes since only 2 republicans voted against including the Democrats

      • KelvarIW
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’d like to know why those 2 Republicans voted “no” when every Democrat voted “yes”.

        • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          My guess is they never read any of it, but heard the Democrats were voting “yes” so they voted “no” purely for opposition.

          • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            There’s different factions in the republicans just like there are different factions in the democrats (though I’d argue that the democrats are somewhat more of a monolith and seem to really actively hate deviation from the party line). At a blind guess, I’d wager that Rand Paul voted no, since he’s one of the more libertarian leaning legislators. Though, I’d be unsurprised if he voted yes. For every good take, Rand has a dozen real stinkers, but much like a broken clock, he does get it right once in a while and isn’t afraid to break from the party on stuff.

  • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    3 days ago

    OK so this is meant for revenge porn / stolen photos… but it’s written so broadly that it will affect basically any online speech. Great.

  • prole
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Wait, US Congress still exists? Certainly wouldn’t know it based on how the nation has been governed for the past 4 months.

  • GuyFawkes@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    3 days ago

    While this is bullshit, we should be able to weaponize it right back at them - any lies the administration spews (which let’s face it, that’s everything) needs to be reported relentlessly.

    Make them feel it!

      • GuyFawkes@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        The article mentioned requiring a reporting mechanism which must be resolved within 48 hours. Because of the impracticality of the timeframe it went on to assume that anything reported would just be removed.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah that will only be true for the rich and powerful. Ever go to the police as a poor for stalking?

          The same way that Facebook can say “no” when you ask them to stop training AI on your data they will just send it to an automated not that will find no issue and deny the takedown but for those that pay I’m sure it will be very effective.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not a rumor, only 2 house members voted against (both republican).

      mfw we can pass a bipartisan spy law no problem but a bipartisan daylight savings law is still too hard.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        To be fair, DST is a more complicated issue. Everyone wants to end it, but there’s disagreement on how to do it.

        One side wants to not be missing an hour of sleep half the year and wants to go to standard time only.

        The other side is psychopaths. We had a Spring Forward. I’m owed a Fall Back. If they try to take that away from me, I’ll take up arms.

    • Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 days ago

      She did. She ‘objected to some of the wording’ but jumped in line like a good little puppet.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Her and Bernie won’t acknowledge palestinian defenders in their rallies. Puppets to the bone like all the others, just another form of controlled opposition.

    • pulido@lemmings.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      She’s part of the problem.

      We like to believe she isn’t, but she’s a proud consumer just like the rest of them.

      She will never fight back against the culture of consumption until it becomes cool to do so.

      I can eat for literal days, having several pounds of meat, for $15. Meanwhile she feels justified in defending spending $15 on avocado toast and her useful idiots support her because they’re part of the problem, too.

      All democrats become conservatives when their consumerism is threatened.

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Flood the zone” benefits both parties when it comes to power grab shit like this. This barely made headlines until it was already passed and it’s too late.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Remember, America, it’s through your inaction that these changes are possible. Really, they should be thanking you for standing aside and letting them remodel the whole government.

    • pulido@lemmings.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m fighting back in the ways I can.

      Namely by reducing my contribution to the eternal consumption engine while convincing others to do the same so our rulers have fewer resources to use against us.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good news, now we can report all those christians online that won’t shut the fuck up!!