• GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Of course not, that would be silly. You can just launch your kid into the school with a trebuchet and avoid rush hour traffic!

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        Obviously you are meant to place trebuchets along the route and be shot from one to the next. With exact timing you could even use another trebuchet to slow you down each time.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    Do they come with the required manpower though?

    Crew of 4 for the tank. Crew of… thousands? To move and use 541 trebuchets?

  • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 days ago

    M1 Abrams: Requires an advanced economy plus an army of General Dynamics contractors for maintenance

    Trebuchet: Can be completely repaired by one hammer-wielding villager

    Plus, I assume that tanks count as a cavalry archer unit, which means any old monk can start converting them. Meanwhile trebuchets can’t be converted until your enemy researches redemption at the monastery.

    • Who knew?@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      in AOEIII artillery are siege weapons so I think tanks would count as that, I remember getting my onagers converted in AOE but I don’t remember if that’s a thing in AOEII

      • hexabs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s correct. Bombard cannons require the monk to straight up whisper in the crouching dude’s ear for conversion.

        In my headcanon, it’s probably because bombard operators are deaf with all that blasting.

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    3 days ago

    bad math, trebuchet is 200 gold AND 200 wood, unless you’re in a civ with gold or wood discount

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    In the older civ games, unit stacking was a thing. The maintenance would be costly and you might break the game with some kind of unit cap, but I think the trebuchets would eventually win.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I play freeciv which is civ 3.5. Unit stacking is a thing and a stack of whatever can defeat whatever

      Incidentally I like to give competing civilizations railway technology so when I attack them I can easily overrun all their big cities in a single turn

  • ianhclark510
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ll accept your concept if you’ll sell me 200 gold for 11,457 dollars

    • IMongoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Risky for you to not include any units of gold. I think I’ve got at least 200mg of gold around my finger I will gladly trade for $11,457 USD.

  • Leeks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Just open chat and type “how do you turn this on” and get the best of both worlds for free*!

    Tap for spoiler
    • may cost your soul. Terms and conditions apply.