• Archangel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    9 days ago

    This is the biggest anti-endorsement I’ve ever heard. Thank you for telling us all that. I will absolutely never be using this browser.

  • glowie@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    9 days ago

    Sad to think there will be real people who are fine with the privacy invasive spyware

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      9 days ago

      my ex fiance loved personalized ads because that’s how she found out about products she wanted and i was like… but you didn’t want it before you knew it existed. you were just living your life perfectly fine and now you’re $20 poorer

      • glowie@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Haha yup the amount of times I’ve tried to educate friends/family only to feel like banging my head against a brick wall would be more effective are far too many

  • Higgs boson@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 days ago

    Blip. Just like that, they are dead to me. I know our society has decided super invasive data collection for ads is okay… I’ve decided that is another part of the social contract we need to revisit. With prejudice.

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 days ago

      The message is aimed at his customers (ie. his advertisers), not for the potential users of the browser.

      • SCmSTR
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Maybe he’s really drank the kool aid and ACTUALLY thinks people want ads and no privacy. Which then, as an investor, might actually be a giant red flag that he’s a complete imbecile.

      • dumblederp@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Obviously, but it’s still not something you want getting out. Like you’d tell your clients at a vendor dinner but wouldn’t put it in an email or video conference.

        • Higgs boson@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          You are just mistaken about this. They have surveys showing 76% of people say they want personalized (“relevant”) ads. Companies think this is something almost everyone wants.

          • dumblederp@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            Maybe I am wrong about this.

            Personally, I don’t want any ads, I’m broke I buy as little as I can get away with.

    • jecxjo@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      while I hate ads as much as everyone else what do you propose funds all the sites people use that are high in operating costs? I doubt many people will pay five bucks a month for every site they use. The internet will just be more retro, which I think would be fine.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 days ago

    Fuck that guy sucking my time with his ads. If I want to buy a ladder I’ll go online, or go to the store and buy one. Once all this world ending shit dies down let’s get rid of “advertising” as an economic concept. We don’t need any more socio/economic engineering, we need humanity and ecology.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      i think some form of advertising is useful no matter the structure of your society: if you have a cool idea for a new product, getting the word out is an important way of making it a reality

      what we don’t need is the constant, and ever-present repetitive drone of advertising mundane things that you already know about

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago

    I presume this browser is going to have an install base of about 1? Depending on how many testers they have.

    • samus12345@lemm.eeBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 days ago

      Nearly half of the country is dumb enough to support Trump. I think he is reading the room.

  • rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 days ago

    Well im definitely not gonna use it then. It’s also apparently being built on top of Chromium so its not like its a brand new browser engine or anything. I wonder if they even had human programmers work on it, or just let their own AI churn out some slop for them.

  • 2910000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 days ago

    Srinivas believes that Perplexity’s browser users will be fine with such tracking because the ads should be more relevant to them.

    I can’t speak for anyone else but no, I would not be fine with that

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      ad tracking is only as personalized as the company running the ads

      If I’m advertising fake nails, it’s personalized if you like fake nails and I advertise to fake nail fans, but if I advertise to all femme people - then it’s no longer personalized, and advertisers tend to do the latter.