It better taste good for that price.

They also serve “domestic sludge” for $1000 lol

  • Catpurrple
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 天前

    I think it wouldn’t really taste that interesting, because it’s only meant to be used as a standardized point of comparison for other manufacturers when they’re testing batches of their own products. I recall NileRed did a video making cookies out of a bunch of standard reference ingredients, and I don’t remember if he said at the end they were bland or awful, but he didn’t like them. The reference stuff simply isn’t meant for eating or for use in cooking.

    • Sidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 天前

      the nilered video was so precious. here we have a guy thats handling extremly dangerous substances (even radioactive ones) on the regular, yet he totally loses his cool over a cookie cracking in the oven

  • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 天前

    It’s not for cooking, it’s for tool testing.

    If you want to test how well someone’s fancy cleaning detergent works on stains, or if their claim that a new knife shape makes spreading easier, you want a very standard peanut butter.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 天前

      Yeah, you’re paying for consistency, not quantity. The standard reference material will contain exactly what it says on the label. No more, no less. It’s meant to be a reliable and dependable product, with absolutely zero variation between batches. And that consistency costs a lot of extra time and testing to guarantee.