Not defending Dementia Donny and either way I’m not shelling out $80 for a game ever, just wondering if this is really a result of the tariffs. I understand the console price being high due to them but I don’t see how it would affect the price of games that are essentially going to be 100% digital

  • the_q@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re holding pre-orders due to tariffs so expect prices to increase further.

    I know y’all love Nintendo, but they’re no different than any other giant corporation; greed is the reason prices go up.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    The prices are still calculated pre-tariffs, thats why they stopped preorders because the price will go up most likely.

    I think asking for high prices for both the console and the games is a big mistake.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    As someone who’s bought games for the last 30+ years, the fact that, relative to inflation, they got cheaper surprised me (for physical games, in any case). For those physical games, one might think of it as a correction. Yeah, the number of buyers is up, but so are production costs. Now, is some of that greed with the top taking those profits? Absolutely and I hate it. Still, I’m surprised it took this long

    • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yup. I remember the first game I bought with my own money was Street Fighter 2 Turbo for 60usd in 1993. I had to run and beg my dad for more money because I was a dumb kid and didn’t bring enough to cover tax. Calculated for inflation that would be around 120usd today.

      And yeah, $60 was steep for a game back then, but I got it at Suncoast which was always a ripoff. Everywhere else in the mall was sold out and I NEEDED it TODAY.

  • MacAttak8@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    3 days ago

    Considering they are delaying pre orders due to the tariffs I do not think tariffs are the reason the price is so high. I think Nintendo is trying to set a new standard for game prices. If these games still sell at $80 then I wouldn’t be surprised to see GTA 6 release for $100. The whole gaming market will likely follow.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      luckily, this is the one industry you can boycott them AND still get the product anyway 🏴‍☠️

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          only when the companies i’m paying money to are not as horrible as nintendo.

          theres plenty of games out there you can buy day 1 without being extorted these days.

  • meliante@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have a story. About 30 years ago Sonic & Knuckles was launched for Mega Drive. “I” bought that for 17.000$00 (Portuguese escudos). That roughly translates to 85€ without accounting for inflation.

    So although the price hike is unfortunate, I’m actually surprised the prices of the games remained stable for so long.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Similar, I think I paid £65 for Street Fighter II: Champion Edition on MegaDrive. That’s US$84 - and that was in 1992.

      I must have been mad. Although, I probably played that game more than any other, at least until some of the huge open world games of recent decades.

    • bufalo1973@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      SNES cartridges were 10000 pesetas in Spain (60€). And I don’t remember any cheaper one.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I grew up mostly playing games that were not the latest release. Like I got Dawn of War for less than £10 around 2008 or so. It released in 2004. Think that was the last game I got the CD for, don’t have it anymore.

      Then sometime in the 2010s when it was on sale I got all the expansions to it and got it on steam instead.

  • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honest question because I’m OOTL, but haven’t games been this price for a long time now and weren’t Switch games even more expensive than this?

    I’m a bit confused.

    • HiddenLychee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      AAA games have been 70 bucks for a while, but I’m not sure of any base switch games that were 80 bucks. Could be wrong tho…

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just gouging us. Even on the 3DS before they shut the shop down, digital download games were the same price as buying them on a cart.

  • DeusUmbra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nintendo just greedy, always have been, always will be. Don’t buy their trash, just emulate it.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      They don’t take in the same amounts of profits as other greedy companies. Only $1.5 billion last year. Still a lot, don’t get me wrong.

      I don’t care for them because of the way they gatekeep games they don’t even produce anymore, like old NES/SNES games. their anti emulation stance is pure garbage, either sell the game or fuck off when people emulate it, you don’t get it both ways.

    • scala@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      This!

      I haven’t bought a Nintendo product since the Wii. Emulate it for better frames anyway. It’s easy, and you can slap it on a steam deck or another portable.

  • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    Vote with your wallet, and don’t let the FOMO pull you in.

    Nintendo is just a small slice of the gaming industry. If you don’t like what you see there are other platforms and game developers.

    For 80 usd you can buy a handful of bigger titles during a Steam sale. Just saying.

  • frank@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Okay, here’s a slightly hot take.

    I’d rather the price go up and the games remain ad free and high quality (not you, pokemon, you can get fucked) than become enshittified with micro transactions, ads, etc

    I don’t like it. But it’s much more acceptable to me

    • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Okay, here’s a slightly hot take.

      I’d rather the price go up and the games remain ad free and high quality (not you, pokemon, you can get fucked) than become enshittified with micro transactions, ads, etc

      I don’t like it. But it’s much more acceptable to me

      That’s absolutely a false dichotomy. In a world where games exist that are ad-free, high-quality and affordable, there’s absolutely no reason to believe any notion of high prices or in-game ads being a requirement for development. It’s just not true. Don’t fall for it.

      • frank@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Okay, fair enough. Just appreciating the lack of shit and (for something like an Animal Crossing or a BoTW quality Zelda game) I’m super happy to pay that much for a game I’ll sink hundreds of hours into, and I’d rather reward that price hike than any other form of monetization by them.

        I’m real enraged by like 99% of things on the internet and in the world these days, but this pales in comparison to the rapid pace of enshittification I feel like I’ve had in virtually every other place in my life.

        Still don’t love it.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      But you don’t need either. Plenty of great games are cheaper and have none of that bullshit. Rimworld, Factorio?

    • DeusUmbra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sorry bro, you get all of the above. Price go up, micro-transactions increase, more ads, and games get worse. We’re already seeing it happen, most games are overpriced and not even finished when they come out these days, and yeah, we are seeing ads in games now, especially sports games, and it seems Every game has to have a battlepass or some shit these days.

      You want good games without ads or micro BS? Buy indie, play old games, and wait for the AAA industry to collapse in on itself.

      • frank@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I do basically only play indie games sans like, 2-3 Nintendo games per console generation. but yeah, sure feels like you get it all in the worst way

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is the problem with tariffs, it’s an opportunity for greedy corporations to increase prices MORE than the tariffs or on products not covered by the tariffs and no one will be the wiser.

    • JayGray91@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I doubt this is because of the recent tariffs. Nintendo is a cold calculating bastard of an old corpo they must have planned this for years.

      So my assumption this isn’t caused by that but just pure greed.

      No doubt they’ll jack up the price more because of orange fuckhead pissing to the wind

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    Unpopular opinion:

    They could probably charge $100 and people would still buy them, despite knowing the games aren’t worth that much. Consumers don’t really care; they just want their dopamine fixes. Nintendo could wrap a literal turd up and label it the next Zelda game, and people would bum rush stores with fistfuls of money to buy it; just because.

    • parmesan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I don’t think it’s as much of an unpopular opinion as it is just a thing that happens. If the Sims community has taught me anything, diehard fans of a franchise will keep shelling out hundreds of dollars for new content even if it’s overpriced dogshit

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        And unfortunately until the community puts their collective foot down, these game developers (Nintendo, EA, etc) will continue churning out dog shit.

    • kemsat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The opinion of someone who didn’t care for the new Zelda games (BoTW & the other one), is that they already wrapped a turd & called it the next Zelda game, twice.

    • JayGray91@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I got flack in a group chat for being highly cynical that the games industry, at least the “AAA” publishers, will adopt the new pricing standard.

      Nintendo is doing it. They can use a flimsy excuse that they are using a stupid proprietary cart. Gamefreak was already doing it to save cost on higher storage carts. Even then they ship unoptimized shit and people lap it up like swines

      GTA 6 will definitely be $100 and have no flimsy excuse

      Ubitencent will get to it eventually I reckon after they finish fucking each other

  • lydon_feen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 days ago

    80? More like 90 if it’s the physical version.

    No this isn’t because of tariffs. If anything tariffs will make it even worse (which will be painful.for americana to watch). This is just good ol’ Nintendo greed.

    There’s zero justification for a Mario Kart game costing 80/90 dollars/euros. It’s simply not a game with the kind of investment behind it to justify such a price home. IMO only GTA6 has a somewhat reasonable argument to get away with that. Yes they will make a ton of money but they also spent quite a lot making it.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Aren’t the physical versions just a key you plug in that let’s you download the game? Seems to me like that’s just easing people into going full digital.

        • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          My understanding is that only some games are a “key in a cartridge” and they are able to be resold second hand.

      • JayGray91@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        No, not all. It’s a an option. Basically yubikey DRM

        Like even the game carts have a few choices for storage. For example, Pokemon pearl and diamond remake were notorious to go with the smaller storage carts where half the game is only downloadable

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    The other thing about this price point is that it’s a headline grabber - and then once people find out more, they will spot that if you buy a Switch with MK preinstalled, the game costs half that.

    So suddenly it feels like, “oh hey, that’s a great deal, and I was obviously going to buy a Switch 2 anyway” - and Nintendo get the sales and the decreased cost of manufacturing the physical game.