• ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I was on facebook, the moment the backlash blew up against genAI, anti-LGBTQ+ hate speech was seldom moderated. I often got an immediate reply on my reports of stuff like that, that it did not violate any rules.

    I had a trans friend in the tech industry, who kind of confirmed it, then went MIA with no explanation.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Because “mediocre white men” were thought to be more competent than “competent non-white men”. I myself lost jobs to “mediocre abled men” instead, because they feared I might bite them (I’m autistic).

  • Uncle Roach
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    If they are using AI for something as simple as an image cover, then there’s not stopping them from using AI for writing “news” for them in the future

    • amino
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      the fact you think Sindarina hates white men says a lot lol

      • sniggleboots@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It was mostly a throwaway joke, I have no idea who they are. It was an interesting conversation filled with good points discussing the topic at hand, and then they ended with a strawman argument to talk shit on “mediocre white men” out of the blue. It’s not my fault for thinking it undercut their arguments, they’re the one that wrote it.

        • amino
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          idk, maybe you’re just a party pooper

  • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I partially agree

    If you’re an independent creator, I would judge you heavily for using AI, it’s your work, put in effort to things you dedicate, or focus elsewhere with stock photos as filler, AI is the middle of the road but it simultaneously means a lack of effort and also a lack of care to even improve it

    For businesses, it would immediately make me rank it lesser but I wouldn’t be as upset compared to independent creators, businesses will do whatever to attract the most people for least and it is especially limiting if you’re a small businesses. It does not inspire confidence but it is acceptable.

    • amino
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      if anything, it’s less acceptable for businesses to exploit artists because if they can’t afford to pay them, they shouldn’t be in business

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Remember when artists often had to deal with assholes saying “Why are you charging for this? My 12yo nephew can make the same thing!” Well, AI has finally allowed said assholes to use their “nephews”. Sure, buddy, you “made it yourself”, but since you give no shits about quality, everyone will notice it’s slop.

        • amino
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          instead of replacing artists with AI they should replace the customers with AI agents having access to their credit cards that don’t make you wanna punch them /j