Regardless of your standing with regards to the Israel-Palestine war, this is an unexpected development as now legacy networks are finally paying serious attention to criticisms of Wikipedia after years of neglect.
Any observers who’ve been following Wikipedia-related rabbit holes long enough would know that criticism of Wikipedia is for a long time dominated by the political fringes (i.e. far-right) and many Wikipedia critics normally gets ridiculed out of the room as they’re been characterized as “fascists” and “anti-knowledge”. Now it’s like a dream come true for those critics as they seemingly get vindicated on television networks.
The only anti-Jewish bias I’ve noticed on Wikipedia is that if someone is a Jew, it’ll always be mentioned in the first paragraph of their “Early Life” section.
This is also partially true for any non-Christian, it seems that Christianity is assumed as a default, but that isn’t applied universally (e.g. this applies to articles about Muslim or Hindi people often, but not always).
Conflating anti-Zionist (or, more often, factual reporting on Israel) material with antisemitic material is a very dangerous mistake not only for the people horribly affected by the Zionist ideology, but Jews as a whole too.
MSNBC and CNN literal garbage heaps that have slowly eroded what news is so that as they approach Fox levels of depraved billionaire bootlicking no one will notice.
Citing the ADL immediately loses you all credibility.
