• loics2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    These posts are already beginning to be tiring. It’s always the same software, and always the same arguments against some of the choices.

    Ditching open source projects for corporate European stuff doesn’t solve anything, it just moves the problem. How can you be sure that every country in the EU won’t break some trade deals and leave the EU at some point? And closed source software is not better at protecting your privacy if that’s what you want.

    And the “European based forks/open source projects”(whatever that means) is a stupid argument. For example, cryptography experts pointed out issues in threema, so why recommend it instead of signal which is open source projects, and by definition, not tied to a country?

    And finally, I think we should stop recommending LLMs altogether. They’re an ecological and sociological disaster.

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Mistral --> pseudo-open-source

    Linux --> not relates to Europe (but amazing choice)

    Vivaldi --> only source available

    • vesi@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It is not only about being european but also about being digitally sovereign

  • coffeetastesbadlikecoffee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    19 hours ago

    From Wikipedia of Qwant:

    Restructuring

    In May 2019, Qwant announced that it would migrate its servers to an infrastructure based on Microsoft Azure, and also keep some of its indexing capacity on its infrastructure.[22]

    Not only that, but they base their results almost entirely off of MS Bing.

    So idk, but not that european other than data privacy.

    • vesi@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Now it is working together with Ecosia on an Europan Search engine

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is using a fork of something really an actual solution? It’s still enabling the dominance of the original corporation.

    I dunno, maybe it is, but it sure doesn’t seem like it to me

  • terminhell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been using Vivaldi more and more. Been aware of it for years, even used it back in beta. It’s almost too kustomizable. It boarders on being an OS with how much is built in.

    • Maestro@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Vivaldi is based on Chromium. When Google kills manifest v2 in a few months, Vivaldi will be forced to follow. They can’t maintain a full fork. So, no more uBlock in Vivaldi.

      • terminhell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’ve been meaning to do more testing with it’s built in blocking. Guess we’ll have to see when the time comes.

      • marlowe221@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I agree, but knowing it’s from Norway makes me feel more comfortable with the idea of using it than if it was made in the US…. (And I’m American…)

  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    both Qwant and Ecosia are working with Microsoft. Not so European.

    Monocles is SearX, which basically is boogle, bing &c behind a shroud. Like Leta also is.

    Mojeek is the only “European” alternative, it seems

    • Graf_Fiker@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      if I recall right Ecosia and Qwant joining together to build a new Search Engine without the use of Bing and Google