• pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Those headlines always make it seem like a big deal, but I’ll only allow myself some joy when I’ll know for sure Elon Musk will be homeless. Times and times again I’ve seen headlines like this, where billionaires are losing billions, the stock market is crashing, it’s never been this bad!!! But in the end, they eventually get those billion back and nothing changes.

    • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I agree with you. Musk alao has a long history of manipulating Teslas stock prices up and down for his own eventual benefit.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      He won’t be homeless, but most of his ‘wealth’ is just the value of that stock. The lower it is, the less of a threat he is.

  • gasgiant@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Didn’t he buy twitter with a loan backed by his Tesla stock?

    If that’s the case and the price is falling enough then the bank could/have called that in. Resulting in the forced sale of his stock.

    Which would be very funny.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If self-preservation is an instinct these banks possess, they should all be calling in Musks loans right now.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        The banks bankrolled twitter to create a controlled propaganda outlet and enabled their boy to directly influence the federal government. I think their investment turn out very well for them.

        • h6pw5@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          And they’re undoubtably confident a taxpayer bailout would fill any loss that might occur. And it’s unfortunately a solid bet.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The tumble erased the last vestiges of the rally Tesla enjoyed after Trump’s election victory in November, when investors clearly felt that a company run by the president-elect’s largest Super PAC donor was a smart bet. It has lost more than 50 percent of its value — the equivalent of some $800 billion — since cresting in mid-December.

    I’d like to see this go to zero.

    He also replied to a self-identified nationalist user’s groundless claim that “groups” attacking Tesla property are “inspired by” Luigi Mangione, the alleged murderer of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. “Wow,” he wrote.

    If only.

  • eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    1 day ago

    Unsurprisingly, Musk has disparaged Tesla Takedown as something astroturfed by wealthy liberals (and conflated the peaceful movement with attacks in which suspected arsonists threw Molotov cocktails at dealerships). On Saturday, he claimed without evidence on X that an “investigation” of some kind had revealed that wealthy philanthropists including George Soros, Reid Hoffman, and Leah Hunt-Hendrix were funding the groups behind Tesla protests through the Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue. Aside from misrepresenting how ActBlue works — it doesn’t fund anything but is rather a system through which donors can send money to Democratic political candidates and liberal organizations

    “It couldn’t possibly be the consequences of my actions, it’s wealthy liberals conspiring against me!”

    He deserves it and so much more.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Molotovs? I think you mean Jewish space lasers!

      Also I think it’s worth noting that he has hitched his cart to trump who has so far avoided any consequences.

      • eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        If there was any proof that there is no “higher power” and that the universe doesn’t care about humanity one way or the other, that would be a very good example.

    • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Surely he doesn’t mean the kind of wealthy liberals who would purchase a luxury electric car like a Tesla and who also don’t like authoritarians?

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    This is the most confusing thing to me. We always hear about how these people are only “billionaires” on paper, and any money they spend is borrowed with the investments used as collateral.

    So if they continue to fuck consumers, the consumer economy collapses eventually. At that point, they’re no longer billionaires. The only people who will continue to be rich will be those directly controlling resources.

    Why would anyone running a company selling ads on websites, or selling goods to consumers, intentionally fuck consumers? It makes no damn sense, and fucks these on-paper billionaires in the long run. If you make the dollar worthless, what’s the point of having the most dollars?

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Why would anyone running a company selling ads on websites, or selling goods to consumers, intentionally fuck consumers? It makes no damn sense, and fucks these on-paper billionaires in the long run.

      Because they aren’t intentionally fucking consumers, they’re fucking idiots and that’s too many steps ahead for them to consider the consequences of their actions.

      They don’t like taxes, because taxes reduce their Capitalism High Score. They don’t like oversight because they don’t like being told what to do or spending their Capitalism High Score on unnecessarily things (like making sure people don’t die).
      That’s as far as the thought process goes: “I don’t like paying money, so I’m going to try to make it so I don’t have to pay money.” They are too stupid to consider the consequences beyond that.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Seems like the expected outcome of basing the economy on maximizing the next profit quarter without concern for long term consequences.

  • thegr8goldfish@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think he needs to do something bold to silence all the haters. He needs to ride that next Starship launch personally. He should bring his pet president along too. Safety regulations be damned! It’s time for action.

  • can@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    gave what was widely recognized as a Nazi salute at an inauguration event,

    Short of officially stating it but at this point I’ll take it.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Does he not know that ANTIFA and the Enola Gay conspired to take him down? And he didn’t mention me, a zuper, zuper wealthy libtard, who financed all this with hundredz of my millionzzzzz. I em… effendead SIR! May your batteries randomly combust.

  • thegr8goldfish@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Stand With Tesla.” Musk reposted it to his massive audience, but the sentiment didn’t prevent him from losing $23 billion the following day.