• Czarrie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I switched off of world because I got tired of my feed only working about 30% of the time. It had been extremely normal, to the point where I can’t recall the last bit of downtime. Don’t underestimate the ability to actually view content on lemmy as a driving factor here…

  • coffee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    How exactly is “active” measured?

    Logged in? Commenting? Posting? Net time spent on Lemmy?

    I feel like the metrics need to be a bit more refined to actually make a qualified statement.

    • fievel@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I cross posted this because I felt like it somehow belonged here. Now I see your point, I look at the site and nothing state how are computed the metrics, this should be clarified in my opinion (now the stat site is open source so you can check yourself if you want).

  • zoe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    predicatble: lemm.ee is reliable: on the other hand shi.tjust.doesn’t.work, and feddit.de has that walled garden beehaw vibe to it (tight moderation). i would predict discuss.tchncs.de would grow if it maintains good uptime record. also external factors could affect ranking like legal prosecutions when caching illegal content and ddos’es, like the other instances cant do much about those either