• pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Most cities are regulated to prevent more housing being built. You should definitely read on the works of Strong Towns, and similar groups, and how you can help change the landscape of your city

      Their website is great and has a ton of details https://www.strongtowns.org/

    • ADTJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Doesn’t work if landlords just buy that too.

      Needs proper regulation

      • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        You’re wrong, building more housing is THE solution. The vast majority of homes are owned by people who live in them, not landlords. Building more housing is literally the ONLY solution.

        • ADTJ@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          That entirely depends on where you live.

          Your statement that the vast majority of homes are owned by the residents is not true where I live.

          Blanket policies don’t work, governments need to implement regulation that recognises the nuance of different markets.

          But also yes, build more homes too

        • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          uh huh. I think the value of stuff should go to the people who made it, who can, individually or as (a) group(s) maintain their own fucking tools. or towards a broader project of building a society. I don’t think concentrating wealth or some edgelord bullshit about greed being good are sustainable healthy or sane ways to structure distribution of resources in a society.

  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    “It’s the market” is another way of saying “because I can”.

    They don’t have to raise the rent to match the market, the market is simply a signal to them that if they lost you by raising the rent, they could potentially replace you for the same or higher rent.

    They could ignore that and leave your rent alone. They don’t. It’s a choice.

      • margaritox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I mean, every year my rent increases and my pay doesn’t (not every year). So every year I have less to spend each month.

        The thing that pisses me off is that I’m not Asking to be able to afford a house. I already gave up on that a long time ago. I’m only asking to be able to stay at a place that I’ve been living in for 10 years. And by the way, moving is also super expensive. On top of that, let’s say I did move to a place where the rent is cheaper initially, the rent is gonna be increasing every year there too.

        I’m just trying to live a stable, modest life without having a panic attack every time I see her, no tape to my door (which usually signifies a rent increase notification).

        I really wish something could be done about this.

        • Dumbitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m fully with you. I just want to have a roof over my head, have some time for hobbies, and be able to afford cheese at the supermarket. Alas, apparently we’re asking for too much! How very selfish of us.

          • margaritox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I would also like to add that I earn above a minimum wage. It’s by no means a stellar income, but it’s decent. On top of that, live with my mom, so we split the rent! And somehow I’m here stressing over whether I’ll be able to afford my place of residence a few years from now. This is not okay. I really want there to be some change, but I don’t know what can be done.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You want to Luigi the Landlords?

          Well it depends.

          Those who own entire apartment buildings… meh okay sure, whatever dude 🤷‍♂️

          The individual landlords who grew up in third world countries who have like 2 properties to fund their retirement because

          checks news

          the politicians (trump, musk) are actively trying to cut social security? Maybe hold off your trigger.

          If you added up all the bad things “Landlords” have done, its still not as bad as the CEO of the Health Insurance Company who’ve done the least denials, much less than Brian Thompson.

          To re-iterate, the “least evil” health insurance company is still 100x worse than all landlords combined.

          If you want to make a real difference, start from the top.

          • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago
            1. This was a silly joke
            2. WhyNotBoth.jpg
            3. Imo providing high density housing is less evil than leaching off people to fund your retirement, building for building.
  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    2 days ago

    Have you ever, in your life, received a rent decrease because they were matching the economic conditions…?

    • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The only reason rent would decrease in response to economic conditions would be if they started building tons and tons of houses and supply began to outpace demand. OR, your country were experiencing deflation, which is bad

    • The only way I got that to happen is by putting in my two-month notice and then signing up for the exact same unit when they listed it. Didn’t even have to moveout and they ended up charging us the lower rate for the two weeks between our current lease ending and the new one starting.

      • marron12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        Were you pretty sure the price would go down, or did you just roll the dice? I’ve watched prices at the places I’ve lived, and they only ever seem to go up. As in, I’m paying $1600, about to get raised to $1800, and the unit next door is listed for $1900. But one place used RealPage, and I would bet the other one used something like that too.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Housing price didn’t ever go down in most cases because of hoarding, there’s no way leeches will ever decrease the rent.

      • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        No, it’s because of a lack of new supply. Most houses are owned by the people who live in them, not land lords

  • terraborra@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Look, what I’d say to you is, that we are laser focussed on delivering outcomes that synergise with our plan to get on with undoing the housing crisis the Labour created.