• LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    This shit happened to me recently. Installed firmware update and immediately my 3rd party toner stops working. Try to find old firmware to roll back to and couldn’t locate it anywhere. Found some for other models via Google drive links in Reddit posts, but nothing for my printer.

    I replaced the toner with new 3rd party toner which worked. And now I’ll never install another firmware update on the printer and should probably block it from the internet.

  • spooky2092
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I fear the day my 2014 hp LaserJet dies. There won’t be a decent printer on the market…

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’ve have had this thought too and the only reason I can think of is that the inkjet printers are sold at such a rediculous loss, that anything that could be sold next to them without the offset price from ink would seem like a bad joke.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          53 minutes ago

          I think they meant - movement to release custom firmware for existing printers.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Haha, my crappy ass old HP printer still takes refills. No printer company shall ever see another cent of mine 😈

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s going to get to the point where you might be better off going back to dot matrix if tank-based inkjet printers are somehow locked down via chemical DRM too.

  • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    This is a total shit move but I have tried many printers and I’m still choosing Brother everytime. Especially on some older generations with copy scan and print. None of the other big brands are worth a shit. They all fail or jam in some form or fashion.

    • junkthief
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Right? I used to recommend friends and family invest in a brother laser printer instead of inkjet, especially if they didn’t need color

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    9 hours ago

    In case anyone was thinking this applies only to inkjet printers: no, it ONLY seems to apply to laser printers – the thing that Brother used to be known for. Where the article says “ink”, they mean “toner”. There is no ink in a laser printer.

  • Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Oh FFS. Not Brother as well. I used to recommend them to everyone. Who is left with unshittified printers?

    • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      I don’t at all feel vindicated, but my Brother printer is the worst printer I ever owned (this was 20 years ago admittedly). Absolute hunk of junk with nothing but problems. I’ve always wondered why they were so well recommended online.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I have the 2850. Been using it for a couple years now. Print maybe once a month. Nozzles get clogged periodically but you run the automated cleaning process and it’s back to working again.

        • ben@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You can run a power clean cycle which should help, then just replace the foam pads they saturate with ink for the cleaning

          They’re not perfect but they’re still the most consumer friendly option on the market at this point

          • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            After talking to support 15 times, they never suggested replacing anything, and power clean wasn’t enough. I’ve long since destroyed the thing out of malignant rage and turned to libraries and copy shops, but it’s good to know that there might have been a solution.

        • snek_boi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          This. My partner’s office is stuck with “it has to be inkjet” and not toner, and on January their printer got clogged…

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Inkjet is great, for photo printing regularly. For absolutely every other situation a laser printer is better.

        • nul9o9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah, that’s true. That was a pain in the ass when my wife needed good color accuracy.

    • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’ve got a Lexmark laser printer, and while there are cheaper subscription toners, you can pay the higher price for normal toner, and buy compatibles, for now at least.

    • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t know if it matters, but I just bought a Canon laser printer. Didn’t see anywhere about forced subscription options for toner.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      The government has mostly turned a blind eye to dark pattern business for years, and now the president is openly saying that he encourages it and wants companies to step up their game. Of course things are going to get worse, especially now where everyone will have forgotten this by the next election, so it’ll get to stay as “the norm”

    • lone_faerie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      With the current US government, there’s far more roadblocks to running a company ethically than turning it to absolute shit

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If regulators don’t stop them from doing it, the CEO’s of publicly traded companies will get the boot from the board for not doing it. They have a fiduciary duty to be as shitty as humanly possible.

      We need laws to stop this, but the politicians are all bribed not to.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They have a fiduciary duty to be as shitty as humanly possible.

        They don’t – that’s a cargo-cult misunderstanding of Dodge v. Ford Motor Co – but it’s so widely believed I guess it might as well be true.

        • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 minutes ago

          Well, there is plenty of evidence to the contrary, such as the way Costco mostly operates. Being the good guys has a lot of brand value. With a little nurturing of the vast propaganda machine known as advertising, that could be improved.

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If the people sitting on the Supreme Court believe it, and I believe the majority of those shitbags do, then that is unfortunately the law as it stands.

          But when the law is unethical, I don’t see why we should be lawful.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s like every company that wasn’t complete playing the social good will game and didn’t appear at a casual glance to be shit just suddenly decided to…go to complete shit. masks off, because they saw it might finally be acceptable to be ghouls again.

      Unfortunately, I’m pretty sure I FTFY. Wish it weren’t so, but that’s definitely what it looks like…

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Unrestrained Capitalism. Without those pesky regulations, companies can charge us all unlimited amounts and not have to consider our rights or health/safety.