archive link

“I recommend being in the office at least every weekday,” he wrote in a memo posted internally on Wednesday evening that was viewed by The New York Times. He added that “60 hours a week is the sweet spot of productivity” in the message to employees who work on Gemini, Google’s lineup of A.I. models and apps.

“A number of folks work less than 60 hours and a small number put in the bare minimum to get by,” he wrote. “This last group is not only unproductive but also can be highly demoralizing to everyone else.”

Sergey Brin, who is worth $145 billion, thinks workers should come to the office on weekends, and work 60 hours a week as a “sweet spot”.

  • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Give me a salary that guarantees $1 million a year post-tax, and I’ll do it for a couple of years until I’ve saved up for a seaside llama farm I can fuck off to. But even at Google, almost no one is making that as an “IC”.

    • spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      a salary that guarantees $1 million a year post-tax

      to keep the mind-boggling numbers in perspective:

      you’re paid $1 million/year post-tax, like you said.

      and say you have no expenses to speak of - you take all your meals in the Google cafeteria, take the Google shuttle to work, and live with your parents or in some other form of housing that doesn’t cost you anything. this means you can put that entire $1 million/year into a savings account.

      even in that contrived scenario, you would need to work 1000 years to accumulate one billion dollars.

      at which point, you would have 1/145th of Sergey Brin’s current wealth. if you wanted to match it, you would need to work 145,000 years.

  • Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    You would have to be super human to work 60 hours a week and actually be productive.

    Like maybe if your work was actually legitimately your hobby. Something that you absolutely loved and were addicted to doing. But even then, I can’t even do my hobbies 60 hours a week. That’s legitimately insane.

    The only thing I can think of that I could do for 60 hours a week is sleep. But I haven’t been able to do that for years now because of work-life imbalance

  • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    2 days ago

    The science actually says that 60 hours a week, when maintained, is less productive than 40. You can gain productivity in the short term by mandating overtime, but the limit is around two weeks. You also pay for it in lost productivity the following weeks anyway, so it’s more a shifting of productivity.

    If he actually cared about productivity (which is related to service/development and eventually profit), he wouldn’t be saying this falsehood.

  • Eryn6844@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    NO! dont do it peeps don’t let them make you go back. find another fucking job or better create one together where you do not have to put up with bull shit like this ever again! FUCK THEM

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh my god I had to re-read that. Fuuuuuck that. Seriously fuck that. All those FAANG companies are like that now. Laying off hundreds/thousands and now are trying to squeeze their employees. Nope, I do 40 hours a week and I’m content with it.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      My workplace is OK with people working 24 or 32 hours a week as well; they pay them less for the 24 hours, but for 32, if the same amount of work is being done, they’re fine with less time on the job.