Summary

Trump’s defiance of court orders—refusing to release funds or reinstate officials—signals a dangerous drift toward dictatorship.

Courts use civil and criminal contempt to enforce orders, yet their power relies on DOJ-controlled agencies like the Marshals and Bureau of Prisons.

If the DOJ ignores or pardons contempt findings, judicial authority is undermined.

With Congress failing to check executive overreach, Trump’s persistent noncompliance erodes the rule of law.

The situation risks transforming government into a dictatorship unless public outrage and political resistance reverse this trend.

  • venotic@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    185
    ·
    4 days ago

    We’re already here. Can we stop dancing around with “here’s this way you’ll know” or “we’re coursing towards this!”?

    We. Are. Here. Already.

  • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    4 days ago

    The easiest sign is when you’re bombarded with instructions about how to recognize if you’re in a dictatorship.

  • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    4 days ago

    Alternatively, the easier sign (since a good chunk of the courts are complicit) is when we started being ruled by decree. The second easiest is when language is getting policed.

    After checking my notes, that started January 20, 2025, when sweeping Executive Orders were decreed that are being treated as the force of law when they most certainly are not. The removal of “T” from LGBTQ, and enforcement of the stupid, unilateral renaming of the Gulf of Mexico is the other.

    Congratulations, we live in a dictatorship.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Id argue its still in pieces thanks to the states, itll be felt more directly in say Arkansas rather than say California. Though I guess thats like comparing Nizhy Novgorod to the Vladivostok, but its still a factor to consider.

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    We’ve been in a crypto-fascist state since Dubya. We had so many rights to question our government revoked, and even the ones who loved it had theirs removed too. Loyalty to the party didn’t secure anything.

    This is just the final nail in the coffin. Dubya tried to pretend he was on the side of the American public. Trump doesn’t. Mask off, showing what America has always wanted to do and become since Nixon.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 days ago

    LOL there’s a MILLION ways we know. another big way is how the MSM fucking ignores them all

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Will knowing about it enable me to do literally anything about it or is this just going to give me an ulcer to go with my other old man diseases?

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    Huh. TIL:

    The looming obstacle to deployment of civil contempt against Trump’s merry band of constitutional arsonists is the reality that judges do not arrest or imprison people themselves. Nor does the judicial branch have its own armed employees to arrest those who defy its orders or its own jails in which to hold prisoners. Those jobs are performed by the U.S. Marshals Service and the Federal Bureau of Prisons … which are both components of the DOJ and are thus subordinate to the attorney general, who is subordinate to Trump. Even an order imposing a fine can be enforced only against a noncompliant defendant by action of the Justice Department.

    Pretty good article on why refusing to enforce a contempt order would really be the South Bank of the Rubicon.