Everything you tell a doctor is public record to be used against you. I don’t want this to sound like I am anti medicine or don’t think people should be able to receive treatment, this is just a fact of life if you live in an authoritarian society like the USA. All the stuff about doctor patient confidentiality is total bullshit and they have a legal requirement to report you in many cases which can be expanded at any time. I’d never tell a doctor I used drugs, I smoked, I had any unhealthy habits, or had any sort of forbidden thoughts. Treat doctors like cops and only tell them what you’d be comfortable with the police knowing. You have a right (for now) to remain silent.
Sad but true
The whims of a brain damaged man who did his own research.
Might as well hand the keys to a Facebook mom’s group
RFK’s crusade against SSRIs reeks of political theater masquerading as public health. Another day, another scapegoat for systemic decay. His “wellness farms” fantasy—where you detox from Zoloft by growing kale—ignores the real crisis: a nation where access to mental healthcare is a luxury and school shootings get solved with thoughts and prayers.
Fifteen thousand physicians called him out, yet here we are. The man who built a career on vaccine conspiracy theories now wants to pathologize the pills keeping millions functional. This isn’t policy—it’s performance art for the paranoid.
Meanwhile, the actual addicts? They’re dying in parking lots with fentanyl in their veins. But sure, let’s spend tax dollars building rural communes for Adderall users. Modern problems require medieval solutions, apparently.
别装蒜了
not only do these people want to do fascism, they want you to rawdog it
Edit: having read this back to myself, I realise that the alternative of non-rawdogged fascism would be much more unlikely
Or maybe they want to do eugenics, not only just on trans people but also on the mentally ill.
This headline and article are focused on antidepressants, but the line which mentions them in the executive order which this reporting is based on is actually broader.
It also seems to attribute the authorship of the executive order to Kennedy, linking to it while saying that he “issued a statement”, despite it not actually mentioning his name and it being phrased in the first person from the president (beginning with “By the authority vested in me as President” as is usual for an executive order).
The article says (emphasis mine):
The government, he said, would “assess the prevalence of and threat posed by the prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antipsychotics, [and] mood stabilizers.”
While the executive order says:
(iii) assess the prevalence of and threat posed by the prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, stimulants, and weight-loss drugs;
I take anti-depressants and I have never shot up a school. I actually need them to manage my anxiety and OCD.
This guy will leave office with a very clear body count, and not the sexy kind.
Easier to list who won’t leave a body count