In an interview with Fox News Sunday, J.D. Vance that “it is possible” that the United States will take over Greenland.

At the same time, Donald Trump’s vice president is lashing out at Denmark.

“There’s something that I think a lot of people don’t understand about Greenland. This is really important for our national security.”

“There are seaways that the Chinese and Russians use, and frankly, Denmark, which controls Greenland, does not do its job. It’s not a good ally," J.D. Vance for Fox News.

“So you have to ask yourself how we should solve that problem, solve our national security, and if that means that we have to take more territorial interests in Greenland, that’s what President Trump will do, because he doesn’t care what the Europeans are crying out to us. He cares to put the interests of the American people first," J.D. continues. Vance.

The vice president of the United States also highlights another point that “people are not aware of.”

“There are probably 55,000 people living in Greenland who are not actually happy with the Danish government,” J.D. Vance.

“They have great natural resources there, they have an incredibly rich country that the Danes don’t let them develop and explore.”

“Donald Trump, of course, would have a different approach if he was Greenland’s leader,” the vice president said.

  • UpperBroccoli
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The words “piss-stained lying sack of shit” are thrown around a lot these days.

  • Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 hours ago

    What happens if a NATO member invades another NATO members territory?

    • fox2263@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think that’s the reason why NATO members have been at peace with each other since it started.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Technically “an attack on one is an attack on all” would apply still, since the us would be attacking. Though I doubt the actual agreements are written so simply.

    • no banana@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I think the closest thing to an example we have is the direct conflict between Turkey and Greece, though that occured over Cyprus which isn’t NATO territory.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The “conflict” being Greece was run by a fascist junta that couped the Cyprian government in an annexation attempt, and Turkey fought back the way NATO should have done against the junta from the start.

        (And then tried to keep it for themselves, as you do)

        • no banana@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’m not gonna comment on the conflict itself. Just stating that it is probably the closest example we have.

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Day one: Greenland loses universal healthcare and their entire social safety net.

    You would have to be dumber than a republican to be a Greenlander who supports United States taking over.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    God, these fucking American politicians are the definition of vomit.

    Fuckoff Vance.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Bro, in the US-Denmark relationship, you’re saying WITH A STRAIGHT FACE that DENMARK is the problematic one? Bro.

  • Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Annexing land for mineral/energy interests, claimed as a security concern… I guess Putin is so far up Trump’s ass we can hear him speaking now.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    As an American citizen I can say that this dipshit freak only speaks for the dumbest among us. This guy’s daddy is going to make America lose all its allies. So I don’t think this loser should be talking about this subject.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    There’s something that I think a lot of people don’t understand about America. They’re currently making a lot of unwise economic decisions and destabilizing the world. They’re not a good ally.

    So you have to ask yourself how we should solve that problem, solve our national security, and if that means that we have to invade the USA, that’s what [insert country here] should do. (Plus we can take their resources.)

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      "There are probably 330,000,000 people living in The United States who are not actually happy with the American government,” J.D. Vance fails to admit.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Not the worst choice. They’re the second-happiest country in the world. They have freedom, look down on bigotry. They have nice pastry…

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            I was more referring to religion, discrimination, being open toward sexuality, reproductive rights, gender equality… But yeah,~~ you’re right.~~ Immigration is a bit of a strange one. I forgot about that. And I lack the background knowledge to understand what’s going on with that. Do they have some bad experience? Or is this just the one big retreat left for being bigoted?

            • Drigo@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I don’t know what this other guy is talking about. Yeah Denmark have its problems like any other country. But straight up saying it’s the kkk is just plain wrong.

              • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                Yeah, I figured I’d ask some follow up questions. Maybe they’d like to explain. I mean immigration seems to be a topic of concern in the banlieues of Paris and Stockholm for example. But I haven’t heard of any severe, permanent issues in Denmark. Other than that they’re more strict with immigration than for example where I live (Germany). But I have been to Denmark. And they’re definitely not the KKK. Both the news and my personal experience say they’re relatively egalitarian and liberal.

                • Drigo@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  I read through some of his comments, and it seems like he is from Australia. He was probably just trying to “discuss” in bad faith. Also the comment was removed anyway.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      The second the US attempts to take Greenland we’ll be sanctioned to oblivion by the treaty we helped create. It’s beyond humiliating, but absolutely necessary.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I certainly hope this is just big talk of a delusional megalomaniac who wants to be emperor and some vice president with an intellectual impairment chiming in to either please him and lick boots, or because this is some elaborate strategy to spread fear and ask way too much, and then get a better “compromise”. But yeah, sad to see the civilized world becoming smaller. I hope we stay strong, don’t give in and in the end the good will prevail. We’re going to find out either way.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    He keeps saying that USA has an interest in it because they have an interest in it.

    There’s no reasoning except for daddy Trump saying he wants it.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        The resources have not been mined because it’s not financially feasible, yet.

        China who are otherwise masters of long term planning discarded the idea about 15 years ago. They wanted to invest in Greenland by building airports and make a transport hub on Greenland for both cargo and passengers in exchange for mining permissions. They backed out because it’s simply not a good business.

        Despite the ice melting, it’s going to take a long time for it to be worth the effort. Perhaps 30-50 years or so, assuming they’re still worth anything in the future and if transport can be done cheaply by boats. Donald Trump would be long gone by then anyway.

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    the Danes don’t let them develop and explore

    Lmao, it’s not the Danes that aren’t letting the resources be explored, it’s the Greenlanders themselves

    • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yup. Rare earth minerals are profitable, but ecologically apocalyptic. They don’t want their island to become an ecological disaster zone.

      • EvilCartyen@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They’re not even profitable currently, given the arctic conditions. Greenland has been begging for outside investment for a decade, but it’s just not viable.

        Ironically, the Danish state might have wanted to invest, but are bound by a clause in out cooperation agreement (Selvstyreloven) which forbids Denmark from investing more in Greenland than they did when the agreement was signed in 2009. This clause was insisted on by the Greenlandic parliament, as they wanted to bind themselves to move more towards independence than cooperation with Denmark, but it’s been a real problem when it comes to developing Greenland.

        Like, the trouble Denmark had to go to in order to build an more modern airport on Greenland…

        If we come away from this with our relationship intact (Greenland & Denmark), the Selvstyrelov needs to be renegotiated to allow more Danish investment into Greenlandic infrastructure and business.

  • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 days ago

    The amount of FUD is insane and I’m afraid people are gonna eat it all right up!

    https://www.berlingske.dk/politik/new-poll-shows-overwhelming-majority-of-greenlanders-reject-trump

    Only 6 percent of Greenlanders want to leave the Danish Realm in favour of the US, and 9 percent are undecided.

    The US can just build more bases in Greenland, instead of closing them down. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pituffik_Space_Base

    I don’t think this is about national security. This is about exploiting the natural resources in Greenland.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s fascist imperialism, because the US is a fascist dictatorship now, and should be treated as such.

    • datendefekt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is not about natural resources or national security, but Russian influence in the US government, and trying to normalize imperialism.

    • TheObviousSolution@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s ok, the ones who don’t want to join will get deported as illegal immigrants once they barge in. That, or put into remote reservations in land nobody wants.