Summary

Federal employees at multiple agencies were ordered to remove pronouns from email signatures by Friday, following executive orders signed by Donald Trump to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.

Agencies including the CDC, Department of Transportation, and Department of Energy issued directives citing the new policy.

Some employees expressed frustration, with one CDC worker calling it unprecedented.

The Office of Personnel Management also instructed agencies to disable pronoun prompts in email systems, marking another step in Trump’s broader rollback of DEI initiatives.

  • MSids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Maybe they’ll finally pick something important to work on tomorrow. Probably not, but maybe. We still have other issues right? I heard a couple of planes fell out of the sky and eggs are $10 and the ice caps are gonna melt.

  • Tin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Comply but include unicode: ♀ ♂ ⚧

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The party of Freezed Peach! Can’t you just smell the freedom?

    Also, I’m sure it’s THIS that will give us cheap groceries.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The federal agency I work with does put them next to your name if you have them registered. Curious how long that lasts.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Anything to distract from the plane crash they caused and plans to indefinitely hold citizens and people who missed a court date in an expanded Cuban military black site the public never wanted built on the first place

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I think everyone here knew Trump would be doing a lot of stupid evil shit during his second term, but is anyone else surprised at the sheer magnitude of stupidity coming from the white house these past ten days?

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Fuck no. Project 2025 was about making the shitshow far more efficient this time around.

      They had PLANS. They published them. Now that donvict is in there, they plan on getting as much rammed through as possible. It’s doubtful stuff like this matters very much other than as ragebait for their stupid base. The REAL agenda is the kind of looting and pillaging Felon plans on carrying out with his purchase of donvict…

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      It’s a gish gallop of petty insecurity, coming out so fast and furious that it takes people off guard.

      Two years from now, when Trump doesn’t have any more low-hanging fruit to pick at, this will seem quaint. But by then, we’re going to see the real damage these opening days inflicted on civil society. It won’t be “lolz, haha, guess we’ll be using a lot of proper nouns going forward” and a lot more “fuck, another airline accident that you can only learn about on Rednote and the forums of Pornhub, because every major journalist has been doing wall-to-wall coverage of the Trial of the Transgender Eleven caught providing underground abortion drugs to serially raped immigrant middle schoolers held in the prison camps of the hurricane blasted ruins of Miami.”

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Bannon called it flooding the zone with shit. Some keep on saying “flooding the zone” is a donvict strategy, but he got it from Bannon, most likely.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Also: Karl Rove famously had his quote, which is basically the same thing - basically putting on a pedestal those that take bold actions and lie constantly in the process:

            “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors … and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

            Bannon saying to “flood the zone with shit” is far shorter, but basically the same thing.

    • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Also pretty much any noun can be used as a form of neo pronoun, so to be safe all Federal employees should only use verbs.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 hours ago

        First they came for the verbs, and I said nothing because verbing weirds language.

        Next they arrival for the nouns, and I speech nothing because I no verbs.

  • Luci@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    12 hours ago

    You mean to tell me the US government doesn’t have a system that controls employee signatures? Are they running Windows NT still???

    -Luci (She/Her)

    • flashpanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Federal employee here. We have to make our own email signatures. I have not been told to remove pronouns by an official channel, but I have already removed pronouns and switched to having Ms. infront of my name, cause it has the same effect and the administration is too stupid to know that.

    • soEZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Lol, we on Citrix cant even set a signature anymore cuz outlook is screwed up

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Oh, no. No, no no. It’s much worse than that.

      Hell if they were still on NT we’d be safer.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Pronouns should be used at the discretion of the individual. They should be able to choose who receives them, how it’s relayed, and what the pronouns will be. They should be able to change them whenever they want.

      Putting this into a database such as active directory isn’t simple when it has requirements that I’ve stated.

      It’s sometimes easier to just let the individual maintain their own signature.

      • Luci@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        We use a third party tool and a custom schema. Users can use a simple agent to update pronouns or make other adjustments like display their direct line. Works great, AD is still the source of truth.