Summary

Trump plans to impose tariffs of up to 100% on semiconductors manufactured in Taiwan, aiming to push U.S. tech companies like Apple, Nvidia, and AMD to produce chips domestically.

The tariffs target Taiwan’s TSMC, a key supplier, despite its partial U.S. production in Arizona.

Trump criticized Biden’s CHIPS Act for funding companies like Intel and proposed tariffs as an alternative incentive.

Experts warn the move could raise prices for electronics as most TSMC chips are assembled in Asia before export to the U.S.

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is really dumb for a number of reasons. But first and foremost, we have a strong alliance with Taiwan, we should be trying to maintain that connection and not let our relationship become hostile. We have military bases in Taiwan, this is part of how we keep a close eye on China. If nothing else, Taiwan is strategically important to us.

    In other words, don’t fuck up years of successful diplomacy to make a quick buck like a nearsighted moron.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thing is, his real goal is to fuck up that alliance.

      Trump has been compromised by the Russians ever since they bailed him out in the 90s. He is actively dismantling American global power, just in a way that is wrapped in a US flag so that the voters don’t realize it.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          You assume there’s a “real power” that exists to stop him.

          The president is not some underdog fighting the power. “Deep state” isn’t a shadowy cabal of people who secretly run the country, it’s the career office workers who have experience working in their departments and make tiny decisions in the implementation of authority delegated to regulatory agencies.

          They’re not in smoke filled rooms they’re in beige conference rooms on cspan looking at PowerPoints.

    • ylph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      We have military bases in Taiwan

      The US does not have military bases in Taiwan anymore - not since the US switched diplomatic recognition from the ROC to the PRC in 1979 - one of the concessions to the PRC was the removal of US military presence from Taiwan.

  • fnrir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    […] proposed tariffs as an alternative incentive.

    He learned one word and basis his entire view on economy on it.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is signalling that the US Is geopolitically abandoning Taiwan, Surrendering it to China. Looks like a backdoor deal has been made, CCP will move in by 2030. And the US isn’t going to fight

    Every single person who calls themselves Ukrainian should be thanking their lucky stars Biden was in the whitehouse when Putin decided to start the Russkiy Mir game. Trump would have sold the country out and they would have lost their sovereignty with a whimper, and not a penny of support from the west. At least they were given a chance to fight their aggressors. Taiwan on the other hand, will lose everything, including their dignity.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t disagree, but I have never understood why Putin attacked in 2022 and not in 2016-2020. The original war in Ukraine started in 2014.

      My best guess is, he thought he could rig an election or corrupt Zelensky and only invaded when that didn’t work. And maybe he was confident Trump would win a second term.

      He might have also been doubting the possibility of Trump winning in 2024 and he saw Ukraine getting stronger and integrating with the West day by day.

  • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is so silly.

    Trump: I’m going to put a 100% tariff on your goods if you don’t start building them here.

    TSMC: Yeah, we’re doing just that next year. We’re already fabbing them there in the US.

    2026 rolls around and the final part of TSMZ in AZ is complete

    Trump: I’m such a fucking genius.

    And Republicans will eat this shit up.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      Half of his actions in the past week, especially in the past couple of days, have done things to weaken the U.S. military. It can’t all be accidental. There’s too much.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most of his orders have boiled down to “report to the President in X weeks” the biggest one is probably the transgender ban. Which, while it sucks, isn’t going to affect enough service members to meaningfully impact the military. So there’s a lot of virtue signaling but not much movement in the EOs for the military.

        The biggest actual thing has been interrupting the training cycles of the light infantry divisions with Warning Orders for a large deployment to the Southern Border. He managed to interrupt the 101st, 10th, and 82nd. Which is ridiculously bad management.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure, nothing has happened yet, but I think you need to look at all the cuts that are planned. Not just weapons systems and ships, although those are on the chopping block, but also commissaries and even on-base schools.

    • mvirts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      Good think I didn’t throw out all those discrete transistors, we’re in for a loooot of soldering

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      To be fair, this was Bidens idea, and the plants are already being finished in the US. Trump just wants to take credit for it.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Biden was not going to tariff Taiwan. His idea was to incentivize Taiwanese chip manufacturing to create an American manufacturing capability. That capability is not fully online and won’t be for years. This is a different policy.

  • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    So if I buy a smart toaster from overseas and that toaster was built with microchips, but is then sold to the US via another country… That would avoid the tariff, no?

    Doesn’t this literally do the inverse of boosting local manufacturing?

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Tariffs are the kind of tool that… is almost always the worst possible choice as a punitive action. The cost is inherently passed to the local populace. So, at best, people are deprived of a luxury. At worst, people are paying an increased cost for a necessity.

      Tariffs only actually work when you already have a comparable infrastructure and are trying to force the local populace to use it. Theoretically, those are the Intel and TSMC (…) fabs in the Southwest (?). But none of them are anywhere near ready to handle the consumer electronics that consumers actually want.

      And yeah. A strict tariff would not impact a case where companies two hop products (which is basically how all “made in america” stuff works but that is a different mess). That said, if the tariffs on Canada take effect Saturday, it will still be very significant costs to US consumers as anything would need to be imported from Europe (MAYBE Mexico but that adds other issues).

      That said, we aren’t living in a world of laws. So “tariffs” on actual companies that are deeemed to be doing workarounds could happen. How enforceable that would be is anyone’s guess, but you can be sure that everyone will be glad to jack up their prices because Apple might have to.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I wasn’t talking about a company doing a workaround, but people buying things from lverseas instead of buying things manufactured locally that needed tariffed parts.

        A company hat manufactures smart bands in the US will have to increase the price to offset the chip cost increase, but xiaomi surely won’t so the “local” choice will be even more undesirable. I know that China has a global yoke on smart bands but you get the idea.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          You may want to actually read the tracking page for your international purchases. When they get held up at a port or international airport? That is when the package is being inspected. Generally it is just weighed and someone eyeballs the declaration form and says “I don’t get paid enough for this shit”. That said, order enough stuff on aliexpress and you’ll have one or two packages get held for a few days and arrive to you wrapped in duct tape.

          Very short term? Yeah, you can get away with lying on declaration forms. But that “big box of books” from Taiwan is going to raise a lot of red flags and then you are in a different mess.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      The US allies also need to get their hands on the pee tape or whatever the US enemies have in their hands…

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s pretty funny how this is an attack that could backfire extremely.

    Almost all of the advanced chips are made using ASML EUV machines. Which is a Dutch company.

    If Trump continues on this path of self-destruction, attacking countries and companies around the world, the US might just end up with sub-par chip production like China has. (They have old ASML machines and aren’t getting any new ones). TSMC is one of the biggest partners of ASML and has a LOT of cards to play to get ASML to not supply any machines to the US.

    It’s absolutely horrid that a boy like Trump has any power and doesn’t even know that his attacks are nothing more than a punch to his own balls. A normal politician would work on alliances to get chip production going in the US before fucking over all the companies relying on chips. Stuff like subsidies for local chip production are not news worthy enough for him to get any kick out of so he just flexes his power.

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s an “attack” that Biden had the idea for first. We’ve been working on it for a couple years now already, and the plants are already being built in the US. Nobody thinks of it as an attack.

      But.

      It’s not working out, because the Taiwanese teaching us how to do it think we’re all lazy, and the Americans learning think the Taiwanese are slave drivers.

      • Tilgare@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        Biden did not “attack” TSMC, he developed a plan to bring chip Manufacturing to the US. Orange man’s attack, an actual economic attack, has no actual plan. These attacks will send industries into free fall and he’ll pull the trigger flippantly, right now (the moment when he thinks he has just an idea of his own), long before the market will be able to correct and without taking any steps to mitigate a disaster. Maybe reactive half measures later, but disaster will happen all the same.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not working out, because the Taiwanese teaching us how to do it think we’re all lazy, and the Americans learning think the Taiwanese are slave drivers.

        I’m choosing to believe this partly because on my own preconceived notions, but mostly because it’s funny.

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    3 days ago

    TSMC opened a factory in Arizona, so it’s really a big f u to the people of Taiwan while the owners of tsmc are good to go.

    I get the bring jobs to the US bit, but the cost will be passed on to consumers and the whole market will shrink. There are existing chip fab facilities in the US, maybe efforts should focus on why they can’t compete instead of reducing demand for electronics inside the US.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      3 days ago

      Chips can’t even be fully produced here. You can make the chip here, but the packaging and some other things need to happen in Taiwan still. Until they get that goin the fab in the US is almost useless.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      The breadth of products and industries this will touch is going to be massive. Even if you’re not buying electronics from a company, those companies still have to buy and replace their own electronics to operate which, if those prices go up, it raises operating costs. Your cheeseburger can get a bit pricier because of this.

    • krigo666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I read somewhere that the Taiwan government doesn’t allow advanced chip technology knowledge be used in the US factory?..

      • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, it is their one real bargaining chip to make sure the US keeps standing between them and China. They are teaching us some of it though, and we’ve been building fabs to make them here in the US for years. Biden got that ball rolling.

      • cristo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Esperanto
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Photolithography itself was invented in the US a while ago, but the company that perfect the manufacturing process that is used for modern chips is in either Belgium or Denmark iirc. That company just leases its machines to TSMC so it’s entirely possible they could just move the machines to the USA. But that’s my surface level understanding, I don’t know for sure.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Netherlands, with key components (precision lenses) made in Germany. None of this could be made in the US in reasonable time.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, let them just fire up the chip factory right away. 🙄

    I want more domestic manufacturing, but it doesn’t happen overnight.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Let’s explain tariffs so that even a baby like trump could understand.

    If an item is sold for $1 and you put 100% tariff on it, it now costs $2 for a consumer in the US to buy. The government doesn’t get to take the $1 that the company is selling it for, they still make their $1 regardless of the tariff. All this does is force the US buyer to pay more.

    I guess he could understand it if this is designed to funnel more money to the government but it’s gonna start impacting his tech bro handlers.

    • Geobloke@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I just want to add one thing, the people in the country that issue the tariff also have no incentive to ignore the new price floor that the tariff represents. Instead, they will set their price to just below the new tariff floor and pocket what ever difference there is

    • Cid Vicious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      What ends up happening in reality is that the tariff cost is effectively shared between the company selling and the customer (but not evenly). The company realizes that sales will plummet if the new price is $2, so they shave margin on their end to bring the price down to e.g. $1.75. But there’s obviously a lot of complexity behind exactly how much of the tariff cost is borne by the customer and the seller and it will vary by industry.

      • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Correct, but the Rabbit Hole goes deeper.

        The company will only reduce margin if they expect to lose volume and if they expect that they can regain sufficient volume by reducing margin to make up for the loss in margin.

        And the reduction in volume will only happen if there are alternatives for consumers, including the alternative to not buy.

        When consumers need the tariffed good regardless of price, the company will not reduce margin.

        (Yeah, it’s complex math).

        Long story short, someone else said it better, a tariff works well, with little impact on consumers, when there is a comparable non-tariffed alternative.

        At the other end of that spectrum, i.e. an essential good with no non-tariffed alternative, the tariff cost is fully borne by consumers.

        Finally, in the case of TSMC, their main product right now are the most advanced AI chips for which there is no US alternative. And US Big Tech needs volume that the US cannot produce.

        Trump is basically taxing big tech.

    • dariusj18@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, but the goal of a tarrif is to create incentives for onshore investment and development to come it at a $1.50 price point. We, in general, have moved past that by using subsidies to not create issues for the economy in the short term.

  • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    We tried that already, it didn’t work. The Taiwanese teaching us how to make them said Americans were too lazy to learn, and the Americans said the Taiwanese were insane.

    • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The CHIPS act passed in the US does help with this. Instead of reinventing the wheel, we’re trying to move some of their manufacturing over here. Which is desirable anyways because it puts them beyond Chinas reach.

      Still that process will take a decade so no luck anytime soon

  • thericofactor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just when you thought he couldn’t get any dumber. Advanced microchips are one of the highest in demand commodities in the world. TSMC will have no problem selling them to the rest of the world outside of the U.S.

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Actually, they already signed up to teach us how to make them, and their plants in the US are already being built. This was Biden idea, Trump is just taking credit for it.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah, we’ll be able to build usable chip factories here in the states in no time. That surely doesn’t take several years to get set up.

  • psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is the intent to make Taiwan just roll over and invite China in?

    Because it sure fucking looks like it.