• MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    ·
    4 days ago

    Until it eventually does come to steam. Please don’t listen to these fuckers. They will say whatever they can for profit. It wouldn’t be the first time these people have lied about this exact thing only for the game to come to steam a year later.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          You already got an answer more or less, but to specify, Fitgirl is one specific repacker of games that a lot of people trust. She (or he, or they or it, nobody really knows) specializes in compression to make the releases quick to download on slow Internet connections. Of course if you’re sitting on gigabit download speeds or something, the decompression will take way longer than what you save from the download.

          • toynbee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Thank you for the details, much appreciated. I extrapolated from the other response - more or less, as you said - but you provided plenty I couldn’t have guessed.

          • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            There’s also the fact that her(?) repacks sometimes don’t install for some people, for some reason nobody has really figured out yet. But they’re a solid choice for those who sail the high seas, because at least you know they’re clean.

  • ditty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    4 days ago

    The game wasn’t even profitable after a year as a result of not being on Steam, according to the article. Pretty interesting

    • alessandro@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Epic profittability is on Fortnite; there will be lot of skin based on Alan Wake franchise and, also, Fortnite ads everytime you launch AW2 form their launcher etc.

      …as for Alan Wake franchise itself, well it goes in the epic games store marketing black hole

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    4 days ago

    Cool. I guess I won’t be buying it then and will simply sail the seas when I finally feel like playing it after all the games I bought on steam and gog.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yup, any “never” decision under modern capitalism should be treated at “within this quarter.” All that matters is quarterly growth, and all company decisions will change every quarter

  • NeryK@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    Epic actually financed Remedy’s development of the game, as opposed to swooping in at the last minute to offer a timed-exclusivity deal. In that case I was fine buying the game on their platform if it meant the game got to exist at all. After all I do not expect Valve to sell their games on another platform than their own.

    Don’t get me wrong: I’d rather the game was sold on Steam, or even better, DRM-less on GOG. I did wait for a number of those timed exclusives to find their way on Steam or other stores (Borderlands 3, Kena, Journey, Control, Hades, etc). It’s a shame that so many people will not get to experience AW2 because of its delivery platform, because it’s a damn unique game.

    • whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      As much as I hate Epic, I actually bought AW2 based on that logic but ended up refunding it because, and I can not stress this enough, FUCK ALWAYS ONLINE REQUIREMENTS ON PURELY OFFLINE GAMES. I refuse to pay for an offline game that locks me out when my internet isn’t working…doubly so when the pirated version works perfectly fine without internet.

      P.S. I also refuse to pay for single player games with arbitrary online “features” made to force a DRM check, or games published by cunts that do layoffs and shutter studios while posting record profits but that’s a different conversation.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’ll eventually be included in a giveaway anyways like Control was. So if I haven’t bought it by now I’m fine waiting for the giveaway.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    This is the bullshit that makes me hate Epic games. I want Fortnite to die already so Tim Sweeney can eff right off.

    A exclusive war only one person is waging…

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I dislike Epic as much as the next guy, but he’s not the only one waging it, lol. Try to find any of Valve’s games on the Epic marketplace.

      • Owljfien@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        I was about to say it isn’t the same before googling and realising that they are the publisher for Alan Wake 2. I guess there might still be the nuance of develop vs publish, does Valve publish any games that it didn’t develop/weren’t mods of their titles? (Genuinely don’t know)

        Either way, I’m still buttmad about the rocket league situation

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    In other words: Sweeney still can’t get people to use his inferior service. I can’t wait to see him cry about Valve’s alleged anti-competitive behaviour yet again.

    Wish I could just wire money straight to Remedy. Best I could do was buy Control again on GOG and consider my seafaring soul free of sin.

  • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 days ago

    This only hurts us, gamers. Stop this exclusivity BS and be competitive with better features, customer service and convenience.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      How does it hurt you? Look, I get that people dislike using multiple launchers, but it’s not like you have to buy a console to play the god damn game. The melodrama is crazy, all you have to do to play it besides buying the game is download epic’s launcher. If you’re in Linux, it’s a bit more of a pain, but hardly.

      • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Apart from the inconvenience (which is a huge reason I dont use Epic) for the same price I get less service.

        If you only want to play games thats nothing, no melodrama, just install the game and play it.

        …but as soon as you want to interact with your friends in-game, download some mods, look up help with the game, stream stuff from my computer to my living room TV, share my account with family or just play on Linux the Epic store transforms from “just another launcher” to a useless peace of extra software on my PC actively standing in the way of my fun.

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Steam’s voice chat/partying functionality is garbage. Discord is widely used for a reason. Remote Play is hit or miss, but I’ve largely resorted to using Moonlight instead on my Steam Deck because it’s more reliable and stable. The guides on Steam vary wildly from game to game, just depends on the community support for it. It is nice when there’s good stuff available, as it is somewhat convenient (though I wished it saved my spot on the page, I constantly have to scroll to where I left off on guides whenever I do use them). Lutris and NonSteamLauncher makes running Epic on Linux a non-issue.

          I get it, Epic is a lackluster launcher. No one’s arguing otherwise. But it’s hardly a huge barrier to playing games.

          • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            My steam profile is 18 years old. I am using all the above features for many years and they are perfectly functional.

            Your solution is to use different third party apps for everything is the opposite of convenience in my opinion. If you prefer the better software for these features, why not the better launcher/storefront for games?

            Epic gives no added value to the user experience (IMO) and does not inspire competition to do better, other that the free games extravaganza to try to expand its userbase, while steam does not have to prove anything anymore, yet still investing more money in new features, technologies.

            The steam users are used to a certain level of service and have a perfectly valid reason to dislike less functional competitors. If you are just here to grab the weekly free game, download and play then go for it, Epic will 100% serve its purpose , just don’t put it on the same level when talking about everything else.

      • cobysev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        By using their service and giving them money, you’re validating their shitty practices and propagating this garbage across multiple platforms when other companies see it’s profitable.

        If you want gaming to get better, stop giving bad companies your money and attention.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s a store not a platform

          If walmart doesn’t have a game, you would check gamestop

          Don’t try to hijack the platform exclusive argument

          • cobysev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            When you’re required to use their “store” to play the games too, then it’s a platform. And an isolated one, at that. Imagine you could only buy a game AND PLAY IT at Walmart.

            Platform exclusivity is part of Epic Games’ problem. Not the sole issue, but a big one.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              The platform is the OS

              And you aren’t forced to use their launcher, that’s a Valve thing

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Exclusivity has been a thing since the advent of videogames, this isn’t anything new. Epic is just a shitty company, so they’re an easy target to criticize. They funded the development and published the game, it’s their right to do with it as they please. They’re losing money by not bringing it to Steam, so their loss, really. But it’s not even close to the equivalent of console exclusives, as the barrier here is spending 5 minutes to just download their shitty launcher. It sucks, but this really isn’t that big of a deal, in my opinion.