- cross-posted to:
- europe@lemmy.ml
- buyeuropean@feddit.uk
- cross-posted to:
- europe@lemmy.ml
- buyeuropean@feddit.uk
Critical industries should use EU tech. Preferably opensource and preferably not by a monopoly.
As a Canadian I have seen our government crumble to for-profit entities. The issue is that a lot of governments do not want the liability of something if it fails.
Will EU countries that planned to use open source options and their own staff, already on the payroll, still likely create a procurement plan for maintenance and ongoing tech support?
For things like government data, they sort of have to run that infrastructure. I certainly do not want my tax data or the like on a Google server or similar. Also people will blame the government anyway, if something goes wrong.
However non government entities can certainly develop software. There is a lot of it used by governments, which is also of interest for private entities and having that sort of tech support is interesting to companies as well. Also it being open source creates competition for getting those sort of contracts. As multiple companies can work on the same project.
I get triggered when a for profit entity (like ESRI) uses open data and then sells it to governments…
Great, start with excluding Microsoft! Oh, didn’t you just say that is impossible? /s
With the shipping containers of money that goes that way great open source alternatives could have been funded to easily get on their level.
The Dutch government at some point after XP was phased out paid millions (which came down to hundreds per computer) for extended support on just that.
It’s so frustrating that most companies in Europe go for the three biggest cloud providers. It’s such a shame that we don’t have a MS, Google or AWS scale cloud provider in Europe.
Hetzner has gotten some real progress, but does not seem to be the default option, or even considered for most companies
Scaleway, OVH?
deleted by creator
What did you write?
Ah, I deleted because I wasn’t familiar with the community. I just said OVH looked nice, and that a lot AWS features are just things you can do yourself but pricier.
I was looking at OVH a couple of weeks ago.
If I was a provider outside the big 3, I may consider a strategy that focused on great documenation/guides/templates to enable users to spool up common services with just the hardware service on my platform.
and that a lot AWS features are just things you can do yourself but pricier.
I totally agree…
deleted by creator
Thanks!
You can add that as a link and have the picture still, would make it easier than looking for the source in comments.
deleted by creator
How, putting the link in the post and the image on the subtitle?
The image link ( https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2c8f66b8-f152-44fd-8b84-709907ab0f93.png ) can go into “Thumbnail URL”
In cases where the page doesent support proper OG format I usualy throw the teaser text into the “Body” part as a quote, for good measure (it might be easier to find the post via search).
Thanks, but for some reason I don’t have the option for using thumbnails
I guess it’s because of the instance?
Anyways, the alternative is posting the image into the body then?
I guess it’s because of the instance?
Yeah, lemmy.world is still stuck on older version that does not have option to do it.
Havent thought of that; yes, this communities’ instance uses Lemmy in a small version before this feature (nothing bad in it otherwise, I know firsthand updating this can be a pain). Yours is lagging even more btw, current version is 0.19.8, you can log in to lemmy.ml or any other fully up to date one to check if that changes anything important for you. Otherwise its not a major issue.
So yeah, leaving either the pic or the link in the body might be the best there is to be done for now.