Ridley Scott explained how studios didn’t realize ‘The Martian’ was a comedy.

  • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The book was a comedy as well. Tons of great dry jokes. The two are not mutually exclusive.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      There’s a chasm between being funny and being a comedy. Comedy is a genre, and I’d argue doesn’t strictly even need to be very funny, if at all.

  • Sumocat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s a farce: “a light dramatic composition marked by broadly satirical comedy and improbable plot”. It’s played straight. The stakes are serious. It should be a tragedy. But then there’s a literal turning point when they turn around to rescue Watney, and it’s ridiculous.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This is my favorite book and favorite movie. So I really must wonder, did they read the script? Mark literally makes dirty ASCII art that is broadcast across the earth.

    • Xtallll
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Have you read “Project Hail Marry”? His’ 3rd book I think it’s better than The Martian.

  • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Maybe it was behind-the-scenes commentary? I recall that one of the goals from the author was that they keep the “positive” outlook. Like, there are plenty of stories of people losing their minds after being stranded.

    This would be different.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    24 hours ago

    The book is hard sci-fi and excellent.

    The movie is dumb shit and screwy. The only way this change of tone and content is justified is by realizing that they switched genres and turned it into a movie.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yes but it never breaks the science in the name of comedy. Using the other astronauts’ poop to fertilize went against the book just so he could make an extra joke. The Ironman scene was also ridiculous and unnecessary.

        The movie didn’t need to dumb down for a few extra gags.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Screw watching the movie. Read the book or better listen to the audiobook its freaking awesome! I own both but end up listening to the audio version rather then reread the book.

      • Lemming421@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The film is great as its own thing, but the book is excellent and Wil Wheaton’s narration is perfection.