• NineMileTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    255
    ·
    3 months ago

    Here’s a list of websites China bans:

    • Google
    • YouTube
    • Facebook
    • Yahoo
    • Wikipedia
    • Marxists Internet Archive
    • Reddit
    • Fandom
    • Netflix
    • Zoom
    • Blogspot
    • Bing
    • Instagram
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitch
    • Roblox
    • Steam Store
    • Steam Community
    • Spotify
    • Messenger
    • X
    • LinkedIn
    • Skype
    • Tumblr
    • Pinterest
    • SoundCloud
    • Signal Private Messenger
    • Dropbox
    • Pornhub
    • XVideos
    • Medium
    • Dailymotion
    • BBC
    • The New York Times
    • Vimeo
    • The Guardian
    • SlideShare
    • Discord
    • DeviantArt
    • The Washington Post
    • Nico Video
    • Archive.org (Internet Archive)
    • Bloomberg
    • Flickr
    • Wretch
    • HuffPost
    • The Wall Street Journal
    • DuckDuckGo
    • Scratch
    • Reuters
    • NBC News -TIME
    • Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)
    • Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)
    • Bandcamp
    • Technorati
    • Archive of Our Own
    • Viber
    • South China Morning Post
    • Plurk
    • The Economist
    • ABC
    • Voice of America
    • Radio Free Asia
    • NBC
    • PBworks
    • The Epoch Times
    • The Epoch Times (Chinese edition)
    • HBO
    • WION
    • Hong Kong Free Press
    • Apple Daily
    • TikTok
    • ChatGPT
    • Rockstar Games
    • GitHub
    • Hugging Face
    • Flipkart
    • Zomato
    • Clubhouse
    • Swiggy
    • Truth Social
    • National Weather Service
    • Kanzhongguo (English)
    • Kanzhongguo (Chinese)
    • Microsoft Copilot
    • Telegram
    • Voice of America (Chinese)
    • Teacher Li Is Not Your Teacher (by a famous anti-CCP Twitter poster)
  • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    3 months ago

    Every fucking Chinese company is required to be an arm of their government and provide them with any information they request. It’s not even a question, they are an arm of the Chinese government. They can get fucked

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same goes for US companies.

      Have we learned nothing from Snowden?

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yeah it is similar, but not the same (at least not yet).

        China is a one-party state, and the government has control over private enterprise. If you are a Chinese company, the PRC ultimately has control of it, and that means the Chinese military has access to anything you have access to, if they want it.

        This is on a different level than anything Snowden released.

        Edit: For people who think I mean “party” like US political parties: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-party_state#Current_one-party_states

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is on a different level than anything Snowden released.

          Snowden released the fact that the major internet companies in the US literally have full time CIA staff and locked rooms with servers

          Why is this on a different level? Is it because they’re ASIANS?

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            3 months ago

            That Snowden releasing the facts and it being brought up in courts, state congress, and federal congress as well as national news all revolved around it being illegal in the USA.

            In the PRC it’s only illegal to talk about it.

            • Bilb!@lem.monster
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              3 months ago

              That Snowden releasing the facts and it being brought up in courts, state congress, and federal congress as well as national news all revolved around it being illegal in the USA.

              Did it stop?

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                3 months ago

                The specific program Snowden revealed supposedly ended in 2015, it collected information such as who was calling who and for how long. The 9th Circuit actually ruled it clearly illegal in 2020 and Snowden made a Tweet about it in a relatively good mood.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Did you ignore the part where it’s not illegal to talk about?

                Yeah, the US is fucked, and there are some decent comparisons to China… But government control and oversight of business isn’t one of them.

                In fact, it’s something that’s severely lacking in the US. We have the complete opposite problem.

        • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          China is a one-party state

          I wish you could realise how hilarious it is to read someone comparing the US and China on their number of political parties…

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh? So you are saying that there are no functional difference between a federation of 50 states, each with individual (somewhat independent) local and state governments, and the authoritarian CCP?

            When I say “China is a one-party state,” I’m not referring to political parties as we would understand them in the US (Democrat/Republican). I am referring to the actual structure of the government.

            You might want to maybe educate yourself on what a “one-party state” means in this context before trying to make snarky comments.

            • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              3 months ago

              You’re right, I’m sorry, I really should educate myself about the US beyond the 40+ years of propaganda I’ve had to endure and the absolutely constant, never ending stream of shit across all media I’m the grateful recipient of, thanks to the Internet™. But honestly, I’m kinda scared I’d actually die if I came to visit.

              Meanwhile, my experience with China over the last ten years or so has left me regularly wondering, in the grand scheme of things, what the fucking difference is. You both are absolutely insane, from where I live.

              But yes, I was totally cherry picking your message. I don’t disagree with you, to be clear. I’m just amused about your choice of epithet.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                No worries… apologies if I was snippy.

                And yeah, the US and China are both insane… Unfortunately for me, as an American, China seems to be the more stable one these days (and it’s only going to get worse starting 1/20).

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sues. Lawyers do discovery. Tencent refuses. Court fines Tencent in contempt, rules in favor of the government. Tencent tries to bribe Trump with something.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    I agree with the US DoD. The large Chinese corporations are owned by CCP members and former PLA officers. Contain them until the PRC implodes.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not to mention I’m pretty sure all of their Chinese office buildings are literally in Military owned and operated land.

      It would be like Google HQ being in the middle of a US military base.

      EDIT: Although I do admit adjacent the Googleplex building there is a Department of Defense building like 10 minutes drive, near the airfield, but it’s probably there because NASA operates on the airfield.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Like thats not a bad idea from an international perspective, there are plenty of folks who maintain connections and may or may not be at minimum an annoyance. Though I also feel like American culture is mercantile and independent enough that such risks are generally minimized, except from so called Christian companies those sons of bitches always have a secondary goal beyond profits.

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh my, the US military might have to change the name of the list to, “Foreign companies we’re blacklisting for classified reasons”. How terrible.

    • egerlach@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Which documents, you say?

      What happened?

      Shredded, you say?

      How badly?

      To bits, you say? Oh my my…

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    Keep it a note that having them listed as a Chinese military company could let US put pressure against open source groups to not collaborate with them; very similar to how US forced Linux Foundation to kick off decade old russian collaborators.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That’s a bad mischaracterization. You cannot force someone to do something voluntarily . Torvald spoke in support of it. I’m sure many governments and groups using the Linux kernel and open source want Developers that are vetted. Or can be reasonably sure won’t be forced to act maliciously under duress.

      • tekato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        It is not a mischaracterization though. Open source projects can be forced to stop accepting contributions from employees of sanctioned companies, which would include Tencent employees if sanctioned. Anyways, Tencent is not being sanctioned here, so I guess it doesn’t really matter.

        Also, Linus was definitely forced to kick the Russian maintainers out by USA sanctions.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Force implies force. If you have evidence that it was actually done by force. Against Torvald’s etc will. Please share it. Otherwise get out of here with your gasslighting.

          Any project open source or otherwise can and does restrict contribution.

          • tekato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Saying that I’m gaslighting without even bothering to check the facts is a very interesting approach. USA sanctions on Russia regarding software and IT services went into effect on September, and all parties had 90 days to comply or be sanctioned as well. If he really did it only because he wanted to, why not do it as soon as the Russian invasion started? Why not do it as soon as the sanctions were announced (June)? Not kicking all employees from sanctioned companies means the Linux Foundation is sanctioned as well.

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Okay, and? Torvald and many others aren’t American, not subject to it, and publicly stated that they weren’t forced to do it.

              You’re claiming, hyperbolically might I add, that you know whats going on with Torvald and the foundation better than those people themselves. And still showing no actual proof or causation. How can anyone conclude anything other than you are gaslighting and being misleading? It’s Mega level bullshit conspiracy theories.

              • tekato@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Torvald and many others aren’t American, not subject to it, and publicly stated that they weren’t forced to do it.

                This is my last response to you because you just keep saying things that are false while calling me the liar. Linus is an American citizen, and even if he wasn’t, the Linux Foundation is an American organisation.

                You’re claiming, hyperbolically might I add, that you know whats going on with Torvald and the foundation better than those people themselves. And still showing no actual proof or causation. How can anyone conclude anything other than you are gaslighting and being misleading? It’s Mega level bullshit conspiracy theories.

                Literally linked the USA sanctions that apply to this case, but ok.

                • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  This is my last response to you

                  Don’t threaten me with a good time.

                  Link whatever you want. But prove your point. You keep saying correlation equals causation. But they’re two different words with two different meanings. Correlation does not imply causation.

                  I absolutely believe the timing of this was influenced by those sanctions 100%. I also believe it was influenced by both China and Russia attacking International infrastructure. Things like the other side of the table being cut , or the ZX back door orchestrated by China last year.

                  I believe all these things factor into why Linus and the foundation CHOSE to expel those contributors. Because they are vulnerable to those authoritarian States. And are thus a vector to attack the projects. Which they did not have staff or funds to audit and ensure they weren’t.

                  You keep implying that this was not a choice that Torvalds and the foundation did it against their will. Despite Torvalds posting the opposite. You can keep linking to the sanctions all you want. And while I think the sanctions played a part in this. I still think Torvalds and the foundation chose to do it on their own. And were not under duress to comply. Unlike your average Russian or Chinese citizen. Not that the West is Worlds better.

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        You cannot force someone to do something voluntarily

        Instantly disregarded. Completely boneheaded thing to say.

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, that’s right. I willfully pay rent and I willfully adhere to capitalism. No force used anywhere.

            Sorry you said something stupid and got mad when someone pointed it out :(

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Damn your projection is off the charts. But I mean it’s what we’ve come to expect from leninists. The childish Behavior I mean.

              Had I actually said anything stupid. Then you should have been easily able to refute it. Yet you can’t. You can’t even actually acknowledge or reply to anything that I said. Instead choosing to Make up things or imagine things that were never Said.

              BTW I’m an anarchist. I have no love for rent seeking leaches. Just as I don’t for capitalist/leninist hypocrites.

              • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                For an anarchist you sure seem like you read a lot more Salon.com than Bookcin

                Or can you even read at all? The first line of my last comment was only 17 words but it apparently overtaxed your attention span. You spent your entire comment here pretending it didn’t exist.

      • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        do you really think I give a shit about tencent? I just wanted to point out that this could have negative consequences for open source projects. Projects sponsored by them could lose a funding source, or any help work done by them could cease because of this.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    almost as if it’s never been about security but about sinophobia

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Lol

      I respect the Chinese people, their modern advancements in science and technology, their industry, their customs, and their rich history and culture.

      I do not respect a hostile dictatorship that rules over them all, and if they were smart they would not, either.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          No it’s a dictatorship by a small group that the rest of them are not in. It’s a dictatorship that demands the common people surrender all beliefs not sanctioned by the state, that demolishes holy sites, a dictatorship that forces minorities into labor camps. It’s a dictatorship that commits hostile takeovers of neighboring nations and allies itself with multiple other dictatorships.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Vote in 60 dem senators and they’ll overturn Citizens United, limiting political donations, and they’ll tax the rich.