• Pilkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a book called How to Invent Everything: A Survival Guide for the Stranded Time Traveler that covers this stuff. Don’t think it’s comprehensive enough to actually invent everything from scratch, but still a fun read.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 year ago

    Skip electricity. That doesn’t matter until you can make reliable turbines with copper and magnets. Go to steam power first. It can move things. Which will speed up delivery of copper and magnets. But also teach them to plant trees. Every tree removed to smelt and power a steam engine needs to have three more planted. You could start greening the Sahara before umit even starts collapsing. “he sure had this steam thing figured out. I guess we will forgive him for all these useless trees”.

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      A great master plan to prevent climate change, although the industrial revolution will start 2000 years earlier, so I’m not sure it matters

    • ramblechat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read they knew about steam power for a long time but couldn’t make the engines / containers / doohickies strong enough to contain the pressure.

    • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, electricity would be magic for medieval (and prior) people. Spells trouble for you.

      But no, Steam… the principle was known and seldom used by ancient greeces and egypts already, but they couldn’t really utilize it, because metallurgy wasn’t there yet.

      And Sahara was almost green 1000+ years ago, lots of oases.

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Boil water in a closed system that uses steam to move a paddle on the inside that is on the same shaft as a wheel on the outside. That’s the basics. Everything else is just variations on the theme. The higher the pressure the faster it goes and more torque you get.

        • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess I forgot to mention that once the steam moves the paddle the steam needs a place to cook down and go back into the boiler.

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, for a first step implementation in stationary applications, you can have a steam machine run an open circuit. Steam expands, performs work, exits through a valve. Just keep the water tank filled. Less efficient, but it would work. The return loop is an optimization for the next stage :)

          • MoodyRaincloud@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            For better efficiency the steam should be used twice, in a high pressure circuit first and on its way back to the boiler through a low pressure circuit.

    • jarfil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Go to steam power first. It can move things

      They had steam power over 2000 years ago, they used it in temples and as toys to amuse the rich.

      Slaves could move things, and were much cheaper.

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They had no incentive to use it any better.

          Without a printing press, which would increase the levels of literacy, and allow sharing knowledge orders of magnitude faster, there was no indication that a kettle could ever outperform a hundred men or a few dozen horses.

          • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a loop - they didn’t use it right, so it sucked, which is why they didn’t try to make it better = they didn’t use it right.

            With the right knowledge, they might’ve just made proper use of it

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah. But, could a single person break that loop? It seems to me like it would still require centuries.

              • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’d say it depends on the person. I’m sure there are some that would majorly change the course of history and then some that would get killed within an hour

    • Illegal_Prime@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with this is that you assume that wood is the best fuel source for steam. Very quickly you would realize that coal is far more energy dense than just about anything except nuclear fission. Planting trees is still a good idea though, but wood as fuel is utter shite on any large application.

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When starting out you don’t need the most efficient. You need what’s available. And I’d rather not reinvent coal mining and whaling.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I read a sci-fi short story about that once. A scientist brings back a guy from the future, but the guy either can’t explain how things work or does so using a vocabulary the scientist doesn’t understand.

    It was like:

    “How do you make a teleporter?”

    “Well you take a zargnix and put it on top of a floon.”

        • phorq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, it’s floon, the “n” stands for non-“v” which is definitely what you want if you wanna know where you’re teleporting too…

            • LoudWaterHombre@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can hack it by bypassing the torrax with a blaqu’ue injection, then you can easily teleport, even with the carglaian model by putting a zargnix on a floon

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh, yeah, with the torrax you could do that, but if you just upgrade your porz ejector, you can make the whole system cleaner than a Triceptian Fo.

    • llii@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know if this helps. It’s enough to know you’re fucked.

    • howsetheraven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Wrap some copper wire around a core”

      Mr. Stegosaurus, please point out the nearest refinery so I can grab some copper wire.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My biggest issue with this is the flight part - it’s a counterintuitive explanation that doesn’t really explain how to make the flight work. It’s not technically wrong, and if you trace that cross-section you will get a working aerofoil. However, you can’t make the Wright Flyer on that explanation, or in fact any of the early aeroplanes that were constructed with simple fabric stretched between wooden frames.

      A far more useful and intuitive explanation is that planes fly by flow-turning, basically the interaction between the aerofoil and the air turns the air in one direction, usually down, which pushes the aerofoil in the other direction, usually up. This also means the air below will end up slower than the air on top, which will create a pressure differential. Either of these methods can completely describe how flight works.

      Also, a plane isn’t just two aerofoils attached to a central body. Early planes were at least biplanes, and you need horizontal and vertical stabilisers to have full control. You need flaps that give you pitch, yaw and roll, and you need the centre-of-mass - the point where it balances - to be in front of the centre of pressure. That means you need the stabilisers to be at the back to keep the plane stable like a dart.

      This isn’t just a “well akshually”, although it sort of is. If you tried to follow the advice as-written and didn’t know this, there’s a good chance you’d end up on the long list of people killed by their own inventions. Actually, I suspect most of these explanations give you plenty of information to kill yourself with but not really enough to actually make any of them work from first principles.

  • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Me: The opposite of B, the opposite of B, plus or minus a square root…

    Them: What does that mean?

    Me: I have no idea.

  • CthulhuOnIce@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I feel like you could still give science a head start by giving them rough ideas of how things work, like penicillin and steam power and whatnot

    Even if you don’t know all the ins and puts you can give them something to go off of to develop the technology faster

    • Intralexical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Science” ≠ Technology!

      If you give them the technology without giving them stuff like empiricism and cultural acceptance of critical thinking, they’ll just worship it like any other faith, and stagnate for the next thousand years.

      Inversely, you don’t even need to give them too much technology, because if you just give them stuff like evidence-based medicine, the printing press, rigorous experimentation and reproducibility, and a couple institutes dedicated to the craft, plus a couple starting points, then they’ll figure it on their own soon enough (assuming an overall stable civilization).

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most likely, people would consider you to be another wacko shouting at passersby.

        Or even more likely, you drink some stanky water that your body doesn’t know how to deal with and die within the first week.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you paid attention in high school you could bring mathematics up to about the 17th century, if you really paid attention you could even grab some stuff from the 20th (wtf vectors why did you take so long to figure out?) and the 19th.

    Plus there is just so much basic stuff you know. Used boiled and sealed water to clean a wound. Bleeding a person only makes them feel good for a bit and does nothing else. Steel in cement makes cement better. Or in the case of this picture zinc and copper and lemon.

    • satrunalia44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      anything about sanitary practices faces a massive barrier of getting people to accept and implement it. I could tell ancient doctors to wash their hands, but the first time someone tried that in actual history they laughed in his face.

      • Intralexical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Monarchs cares about power. Give the ruler some more metallurgy or siege engines first, so you have their favour. Then split the Royal Court’s physicians into two groups, one that washes their hands, and one that doesn’t. Do the same for leeches, bloodletting, hydration, etc. It’ll be hard to argue with the resulting death rates. And in the long run, you’ll have a much bigger impact by introducing empricism/A-B testing/evidence-based medicine than any one thing specific thing you could have done.

      • Chailles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But on the other hand, there’s a decent chance of you worked hard enough, they could probably get there at least a century or two after your death.

    • PorkRollWobbly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s assuming you don’t either kill them all off with your 21st century germs and/or be killed because the church doesn’t like you.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I scoff at your suggestion! We must compulsively dissect those unspoken assumptions. This is the internet, you see, where the most brilliant of minds gather to squabble about peripheral details so that no fun can ever be had. Yuck having fun!

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      People were so moronic back then, even more than today, saying any one of those things would have you burned like a witch 😂

    • gayhitler420@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Steel reenforcement of old European concrete would have been disastrous. They used limestone in the aggregate and cement and it would have eaten the steel in a decade or two.

    • jarfil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Steel, like the strong metal for weapons? You want how much of it, and throw it where? And what’s a “lemon”?

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Depends on where and when you’d go.

          They had “citrons” since 4000 BC or more, which came in many different shapes, some with no pulp and no acidity, which wouldn’t work for making electricity. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citron

          Lemons were introduced in Europe around 200 AD, and were pretty rare and expensive.

          If you went to biblical times and asked for a lemon, they’d likely not know what you meant, then maybe gave you a citron, which could be of the low acidity kind, then beat you up for being a liar.

  • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You could probably make explosives from manure. Use that to conquer a small community and make yourself the leader. And start a rebellion against the local lord and become the king. Then you have the resources and slaves to find copper and magnets and shit. Problem is the massive language barrier. Their language is just gibberish to us and vice versa.

  • DingusKhan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know, a fun project would be compiling an instruction book for elevating/fast forwarding technology just in case someone does get sent back in time.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      We could send them to the end of the galaxy to compile an encyclopedia of all human knowledge but they’d secretly be there to start the next iteration of civilization through the foolproof strategy of not doing much and just letting the pre-calculated history take its course.

    • 5C5C5C@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want this for when climate collapse destroys modern civilization and the survivors are left to rebuild society without the benefit of global supply chains or information infrastructure.

        • PorkRollWobbly@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve put a bit of thought into this and I feel that even if you could bring every blueprint for every technology ever made onto a computer with 10 backups, you would still need to be extremely lucky on whether you get people skilled enough to recreate those technologies.

          • Liz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’d need the social skills to demonstrate technological improvements (say, a better axe) without causing everyone to freak out and call you a demon. You’d also have to keep your phones and charging devices secret until after you’ve recruited a few technophiles because otherwise someone is going to break them accidentally when they confiscate them for one reason or another.

            Basically you need to recruit a few smart people who can be trusted and get them on your side. You might even want to funnel all your “inventions” through them to keep the heat off you, and this is assuming you end up in a culture that would even value technological advancement.

            • Intralexical@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              this is assuming you end up in a culture that would even value technological advancement.

              People value their friends and family not dying, and the murdering raiders from neighbouring tribes being kept at bay. And people that don’t value that don’t tend to last very long.

              You’d need the social skills to demonstrate technological improvements (say, a better axe) without causing everyone to freak out and call you a demon.

              …Starting with an axe would be nice. The lumberfolk would appreciate it, surely. But then what happens when the old blacksmith blames your witchcraft for the crops failing next year, or for the village chief’s child falling ill? So maybe teach the blacksmiths too, so they also benefit from you— I’m sure they’ll love having some upstart come in and tell them how to do their jobs.

              You’re an outsider, no matter what, and you’re never going to completely look like them or sound like them or act like them— Can we really think that any amount of social skills will be enough to keep you safe, when they might just be determined to hate you for what you are?

              Maybe start with a combination of military and medical technology. Show them a crude crossbow; when they see the next raid of Goths or Aztecs or Mongols or Vikings or Peloponnesians or whomever being repelled before they even reach the gates, they’ll come to appreciate it sooner or later… Their enemies are against their gods, so if you helped defend them from their enemies, you must be sent by their gods. Disgustingly, hating the same out-group is a great way to keep yourself safe in any given in-group, whether at work or at war. Medicine’s probably trickier, because if you fail to save somebody then some people will probably blame you for their death. But if you make it clear that you can’t stop fate from running its course, and you start with some basic stuff, they’ll probably come to appreciate that their friends aren’t dying as much from infections anymore too.

              Fear of death has always been sadly the strongest motivator for embracing technological change. Modern aviation, computing, and nuclear science all came after WWII; and “anti-vax” movements only thrive in countries that have already essentially eradicated the concerned diseases. It’ll be harder for them to crucify somebody whom they can see is standing between them and death.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know why they put just one zero in front of years. That just makes the clock slightly longer, and it’s still insignificant in the grand scheme of things.

        02023 in years only is good until 99999, then you’d need to prepend another zero.

        • Intralexical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a constant symbolic reminder, and still a 10X scope increase.

          If you want to be pedantic about making “the clock slightly longer”, you might as well say “I don’t see why they don’t write their dates out in base 62. Then they could make the clock shorter by writing wD instead of 2023”. The point is that everyone who sees “02023” can have a bit of an “oh shit” moment where they instantly understand what it means.

    • Cyclist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a couple of books that do this: How to Invent Everything, and How Rebuild Civilization.

  • realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m impressed at the strength of the guy’s upper arm that he’s sitting on.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’d actually be able to teach them how to make it if they have copper and magnets, since I know how to make a simple generator. They’d be SOL on how to use it though, because I don’t know how to make something entirely from raw materials that would require electricity. Which means they also wouldn’t know I am creating it with the generator… 🤔 Uh… Shit.

    This is actually kinda wild to think about and I hadn’t considered it before. Making electricity is easy! Using it is actually more complicated.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Expose molten ferrous metal to … a magnet.

        Welp…

        Magnets are created by running an electrical current through a material, so there is no need to have a ‘first magnet’. This is happening ‘naturally’ in the earth core, in the sun, and in other stars. (https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/565245/how-was-the-first-magnet-made)

        So you need to look around and find some magic rocks.

        Natural magnets, called “lodestones”, were found in iron ores (magnetite) from the ancient region of Magnesia, hence the name “Magnet”. (https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/615500/how-did-magnets-first-come-about)

        Maybe the sword with the stone was just a big lodestone with a sword sized hole in it. Just throwing that out there.

        And one more cool fact…

        Based on his discovery of an Olmec artifact (a shaped and grooved magnetic bar) in North America, astronomer John Carlson suggests that lodestone may have been used by the Olmec more than a thousand years prior to the Chinese discovery.[23] Carlson speculates that the Olmecs, for astrological or geomantic purposes, used similar artifacts as a directional device, or to orient their temples, the dwellings of the living, or the interments of the dead.[23] Detailed analysis of the Olmec artifact revealed that the “bar” was composed of hematite with titanium lamellae of Fe2–xTixO3 that accounted for the anomalous remanent magnetism of the artifact.[24] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lodestone)

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Alright it’s decided, you’re the guy we’re sending back to teach Jesus how to build gaming PCs from scratch.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Forget mathematics, logic and philosophy. Teach them about Jeebus and establish a solid patriarchy. After that make a shitload of McDonald’s and Facebook.