Hello everyone,

I recently came across an article on TorrentFreak about the BitTorrent protocol and found myself wondering if it has remained relevant in today’s digital landscape. Given the rapid advancements in technology, I was curious to know if BitTorrent has been surpassed by a more efficient protocol, or if it continues to hold its ground (like I2P?).

Thank you for your insights!

  • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    A better question is; What would you change in the current Internet/WWW to make it as decentralized as Torrents are?

    • FundMECFSResearch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      I wish there was a decentralised way of hosting websites. Kind of like torrents.

        • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Problem with IPFS, is that it’s not really that decentralized as I wish it was. Since by default the data is not shared across the network, meaning if nobody is downloading and hosting that node, you are still the only one having a copy of the data. Meaning if your connection is gone or if you get censored, there is no other node where the IPFS data is living. It only works if somebody else is activily downloading the data.

          Ow, and then you also need to Pin the content, or the data will be removed again -,-

          Furthermore, the look-up via DHT is very slow and resolving the data is way too slow in order to make sense. People expect today max 1 or 2 seconds look-up time + page load would result in 4 or 5 seconds… Max… However with IPFS this could be 20, 30 seconds or even minutes…

        • FundMECFSResearch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          That’s just for files though. Imagine a specific decentralised protocol for hosting websites.

          You can technically host a website on IPFS but it’s a nightmare and makes updating the website basically impossible 2021 wikipedia IPFS Mirror. A specific protocol would make it far more accessible.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            Websites are just files. For something like running a site on ipfs, you’d want to pack everything into a few files, or just one, and serve that. Then you just open that file in the browser, and boom, site.

            I’m not really sure it qualifies as a web site any more at that point, but an ipfs site for sure. Ipfs has links, right?

            • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              With LibreWeb I tried to go this route, using IPFS protocol. But like I mention above, IPFS is not as decentralized by design as people might think. People still need to download the content first and hosting a node… And then ALSO pin the content… It’s not great. And look-up takes way too long as well with their DHT look-up.

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Well… it’s not really designed for that use case, so yeah you’ll have to deal with issues like that. For interplanetary file transfers, that’s acceptable.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        That would be very cool, I know we have onion sites that operate on the Tor network that use keypairs for the domains, but the sites themselves are still centrally hosted by a person, anonymously hosted but still centrally hosted.

      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        There’s some cryptobro projects about sticking distributed file sharing on top of ~ THE BLOCKCHAIN ~.

        I’m skeptical, but it might actually be a valid use of such a thing.

        • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Blockchain is a nice technology, but not all the solutions need blockchain technology. Just like BitTorrent doesn’t require blockchain, a decentralized internet alternative also doesn’t need blockchain.