• Nomecks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 days ago

    Math is the programming language of the universe and physics is the rule book.

    • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s a good way to put it.

      I’d personally amend it to this though:

      Math is the language we use to write pseudo-code for the rules of the universe. It allows us to reasonably predict and share/write our understanding of the universe.

      The best algorithms then match with the actual universe even if the real thing doesn’t use the math (looking at you -1, infinite points and black holes)

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      Physics is basically “some guy way cooler and way nerdier than you 100 years ago did some experiments observing this law, and because of that we can use really hard math to predict the whole universe.”

      • niktemadur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Some very specific experiments, precise and weird enough to produce some truly abstract results with strong hints of things like electron spin, neutron decay via the Weak Force, photon entanglement.

        Or out in the field - imagine hiking to the top of Ben Nevis in Scotland, then going up a further couple of kilometers on a balloon, carrying a camera and a vacuum chamber with an alcohol gas cloud within, to photograph the trajectories and interactions of mysterious particles from space.

        Back at Edinburgh or Manchester, wearing your tuxedo on weeknights, for an evening of drinks at the gentlemen’s club, discussing the latest results and implications with your peers, over single malts and cigars.

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      You’re not wrong, but we’re doing the experiments to test the theory, and that requires some math

      • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Or: We’re using math to summarise what the experiments have said so far. And then using that to extrapolate what might happen in the next experiment.

  • drathvedro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    How relevant is this to modern Physics?

    As far as I know, modern math is mostly dealing with set theory and some imaginary 17D pringles in empty space, while modern physics is dealing with some imaginary 17D pringles in… uh…

    Well, to put it this way, if decent writing is a prerequisite for doing math, does that mean that all math is essentially just applied poetry?