• The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Important context: it’s a mix of things that do and don’t exist which all have a certain cachet with junk science. Tesla coils are definitely real, for example. It’s just that junk/fringe science may use them to make their flimflam theory seem more exciting.

    • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe “science fiction buzzwords” is a better descriptor then, because I started at antmatter and I was like “how is that ‘fringe’?”

    • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I similarly thought this was supposed to be a list meant to help you identify when someone is deploying fringe science. But in the context of the community (sciencefiction) and some of the other comments, I’ve realized that I think it’s meant to be sample signs you could use in a story like at a lab where that kind of “science” was being done.

    • Crul@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      AFAIK all of them are fake warning signs but, as you said, some of them reference real stuff.

      I didn’t add any indication that they are fake because I assumed it was implied by posting in science fiction communities. If not, I will add a warning.

  • PinkOwls@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love these!

    I guess I will have to upload my scifi NATO-symbols at some point, here’s an example (it’s a bipedal non-atmospheric reconnaissance mech):

    Recon Mech

  • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The perpetual motion one makes sense I think since I’d something can run forever could you even stop it? Or maybe it holds a certain torque until acted upon by a greater force

    “The lumber mill had to be shut down because someone overloaded the perpetual motion machine providing power to it and now the bosses are trying to figure out if they can get it fixed or if it’s cheaper to buy a new one, they just don’t make things like they used to”

  • QubaXR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely love the idea!

    Unfortunately I find execution lacking. There is too little visual consistency. Different signs don’t look like a pictographic system, but instead as icons from different styles and systems pasted onto a common template.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I should put one of those “atomic switches” on every light switch in my home… but I don’t think I have enough Higgs field stickers.

    • Crul@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would say Maxwell’s Demon:

      Maxwell’s demon is a thought experiment that would hypothetically violate the second law of thermodynamics. It was proposed by the physicist James Clerk Maxwell in 1867. In his first letter, Maxwell referred to the entity as a “finite being” or a “being who can play a game of skill with the molecules”. Lord Kelvin would later call it a “demon”.

      In the thought experiment, a demon controls a small massless door between two chambers of gas. As individual gas molecules (or atoms) approach the door, the demon quickly opens and closes the door to allow only fast-moving molecules to pass through in one direction, and only slow-moving molecules to pass through in the other. Because the kinetic temperature of a gas depends on the velocities of its constituent molecules, the demon’s actions cause one chamber to warm up and the other to cool down. This would decrease the total entropy of the system, without applying any work, thereby violating the second law of thermodynamics.

      • jopepa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s interesting to think of the warning with knowing that. Thanks for explaining.