Donald Trump has submitted a filing to the Supreme Court regarding the TikTok case brought by the Justice Department, which the court will decide in the coming session. The lawsuit brought by the DOJ alleges "violations of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act and its implementing regulations...

Summary

Donald Trump submitted a Supreme Court filing opposing a TikTok ban, citing his “dealmaking expertise” and promising to resolve national security concerns.

The brief advocates delaying the case to allow Trump to address it politically.

Legal experts criticized the filing for being overly self-promotional and unprecedented, with some mistaking it for satire.

Critics noted its unusual tone and highlighted the involvement of Trump’s potential solicitor general pick, D. John Sauer, in drafting the document.

The case concerns TikTok’s alleged violations of privacy laws and ties to China.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    3·
    2 days ago

    I’m amazed you do not see the issue with this not being a reciprocal situation. What you’re doing is making poor excuses for what is very clearly a two-tiered system, one for people in China where the content can be easily controlled, and one for people outside of China where it can’t… but where it can absolutely still be used for propaganda. By, for example, letting “many popular Douyin creators” have their content reposted on TikTok.

    And before you start in with me about it, I could not give less of a shit whether or not it’s banned. I’m just under no illusions about what the situation is here.

    • LadyAutumnEnglish
      4·
      2 days ago

      I just don’t see this in particular as a two tiered system. Chinese citizens don’t use TikTok content is copied over from that platform by other people. Douyin connects with a bunch of the other social media systems created in China, it’s exclusively in Chinese and is made for Chinese citizens. TikTok is usable, essentially anywhere else in the world. Douyin is usable in China specifically. You can use it outside of China you just cannot comment or post.

      I don’t know I’m just under no particularly obsessive illusions about China. Yeah they definitely censor their citizens in intrusive and oppressive ways and that’s wrong and bad. So does nearly every single nation on earth. Why would my beef with China specifically, as opposed to American social media which spans the globe and is constantly flooded with western neoliberal propaganda?

      Like it’s just silly and frustrating the way so much fear and discussions is directed towards China specifically. Like to a wild extent like anything done by China anything Chinese must be nefarious in some way. Fear mongering around TikTok is just. Weird. The same reaction doesn’t exist towards reels even though reels censors even more subjects than TikTok does.

      And like that’s what my initial comment was about right I saw someone say something I know wasn’t true because I’ve used the app myself.

      And you know me too, we’ve talked many times we’re definitely not strangers haha. We’ve been on the same and on opposite sides of at least a dozen discussions on Lemmy before. You can have some small measure of faith that I’m not a tankie here to act like authoritarian oppression is good actually.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        2·
        2 days ago

        It’s a two-tiered system because there are literally two tiers. There’s one where people can use TikTok outside China and one where people can use Douyin inside China. And content only goes one way. I’m not sure how more clear this can be made to you.

        Also, stop making this about you. It isn’t about you. I never made any claims about you apart from you making poor excuses for a two-tiered system. And I stand by that claim.

        • LadyAutumnEnglish
          2·
          2 days ago

          I’m not making anything about me I’m just responding to this general skepticism about the intention of my statements. If I read your comment incorrectly then I’m sorry. I’m also not in the business of acting like this is a discussion that matters to anyone beyond you and me, this isn’t groundbreaking political commentary that people are anxiously watching play out. Acknowledging the fact that we’ve spoken many times before is I think worthwhile within that context.

          Tiers implies one is above the other somehow. But they aren’t they’re two distinct systems. I’m going to loop back to what I initially commented about which was the app itself and how it doesn’t function the way the commenter I responded to described it. Why would someone lie about how an app functions? Why specifically douyin, why specifically a Chinese social media app? It’s worth examining that decision and the ideas that it fosters about China.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            1·
            2 days ago

            I have said nothing about your intentions. I have no idea why you are suggesting I am. I told you what I said about you and I still stand by it. You are poorly defending a two-tiered system.

            Why you are defending it is not something I care to speculate on.

            And one is above the other if content only goes one way. Because only one group can see content from both platforms. The other can’t. This is some basic logic…

            • LadyAutumnEnglish
              3·
              2 days ago

              Okay, yeah, your framing at the end there makes sense. I’m not sure how or why our conversation came about that specifically, but yes Chinese citizens are essentially sequestered on Douyin. I don’t know that they are unable to install TikTok, but I kind of assume so.

              I still think the framing of two tiered is an odd way to put it but I at least understand what it is you’re trying to say.

              You can imagine my confusion on what I thought was a pretty innocuous comment touching on something most people don’t know much about that I actually do and was met with some pretty intense responses from you lol.