Musk has denounced Wikipedia as "Wokepedia" on X and urged people not to donate to the platform.
    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      20·
      16 hours ago

      Wikipedia is a good cause, but I feel like archive.org is in dire need of fundings.

      Then English wikipedia is only about 100GB (excluding videos), archive.org is in the TERABYTES with some report of it being in PETABYTES. They need funding to keep up the maintenance of their storage and backups, and for the bandwith for people to access it. They’ve been attacked by hackers a few months ago so they’ll need better security and that might cost money. They are under constant lawsuits over alleged copyright issues, lawsuits cost a lot of money. They’re gonna need more funding than wikipedia to survive. I think Wikipedia already has enough funding to survive for quite a while.

      Edit: What I means is, for every $5 wikipedia needs, archive.org might need like $50

      So if you want to help both, the ratio of donations should be at least 10 to 1 (ratio between archive.org and Wikipedia)

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    140·
    1 day ago

    A freely accessible collection of human knowledge? Of course authoritarians hate it. An informed populace is their enemy.

    • kchr@lemmy.sdf.org
      11·
      22 hours ago

      All under the guise of “free speech”. Which, as we all know, means speech that align with Elon’s currently held opinions.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.caEnglish
    36·
    1 day ago

    Reminds me to donate to Wikipedia … and download another updated copy of the entire Wikipedia database.

        • IninewCrow@lemmy.caEnglish
          5·
          20 hours ago

          I’ve only ever used Kiwix … it’s the easiest and most easily installable on different devices.

          I’ve downloaded the entire database about six times now over the past few years. I keep a duplicated copy everywhere … laptop, tablet, storage drive, portable drive, smartphone … in multiple places at home / cottage / relatives place

          My latest download will only be to have an updated copy as my last one is about a year old.

          I don’t like doomsday prepping and I don’t really prepare for anything. I’ve been self sufficient all my life and if the world ends, I’ll be able to make do on my own, I always have. But when it comes to knowledge and information, keeping a copy of Wikipedia is no-brainer for me.

          • kchr@lemmy.sdf.org
            2·
            6 hours ago

            I’m not the prepper person either, but I like to be self-sufficient and not be overly reliant on modern technology. My primary use case has been during travels.

  • lolola
    61·
    1 day ago

    Guess who’s getting their first donation ever from me.

    Wait, maybe that’s what he wanted to have happen. Maybe?

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    35·
    1 day ago

    I have my issues with Wikipedia, and he’s not wrong about the concentration of power amongst editors. However, fuck Elon Musk. He’s just mad that he can’t control Wikipedia himself.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldEnglish
      17·
      23 hours ago

      he’s not wrong about the concentration of power amongst editors

      The classic problem of an open-edit document like Wikipedia is the manpower it takes to manage the project properly relative to the incentives to fuck with it by malicious actors. Elon’s answer to this problem is to monetize the sinking ship to the hilt and then use the excess revenues to buy the next new thing. The Jimmy Wales approach is to build out a network of trusted administrators and semi-trusted volunteers to play wack-a-mole on this one single project forever.

      Originally, the theory of Wikipedia was that you’d have far more good actors than bad. Therefore, the bulk of the encyclopedia would accumulate useful information that went largely unmolested and didn’t need to be babysat by live humans. This… hasn’t proven to be the case. So the costs of the website continue to expand as the content base does.

      Automation of spammers, scammers, and malicious actors has made the problem even more difficult. And I have no doubt that Elon’s own digital vandalism efforts have taken their toll as well. There’s simply too much economic incentive to fuck with the public’s understanding of the world for a project like Wikipedia to go ignored.

      I’m afraid its days are ultimately numbered, precisely because too many people trust it.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        2·
        6 hours ago

        I’m proud to downvote this screed of baseless doomsaying but I’m dismayed at the fact that I’m the only one doing so.

        Just goes to show that you come to Lemmy because of the potential of a federated platform, not for the reality of its current community (which is absolute garbage.)

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          6 hours ago

          this screed of baseless doomsaying

          If you think enshittification can’t come for you, its only a matter of time before you’re proven wrong.

          • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
            2·
            5 hours ago

            If you think that enshittification of all platforms everywhere is completely inevitable and we should just throw up our hands and give up at the slightest threat then you’re unfortunately in good company here.

      • ironsoap@lemmy.oneEnglish
        2·
        15 hours ago

        Makes me wonder if you won’t see and Andrew Carnegie of this era step up and endow it against his fellow capitalist.