• Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    2 months ago

    Guaranteed if original Star Trek came out today, it would be decried as “woke” and “DEI” and there would be outrage over it from the usual culture warriors.

    • H1jAcK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      2 months ago

      Okay, I’ve finally looked up what DEI means… Diversity, equity, and inclusion are things people are berated for??

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not what DEI means. It’s about what it stands for.

        Conservatives don’t want to be told to treat people with decency. They want to treat however the fuck they want, and then tell you that you aren’t treating them decently.

        It’s about wielding power.

        • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is what they mean with those “My rights don’t end where your feelings begin” bumper stickers. The only right they’re losing is the right to being a bigoted asshole.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 months ago

        DEI is the current iteration of affirmative action, that’s all.

        The problem with DEI is that it’s an imperfect solution that only came about because racists and other bigots couldn’t behave themselves. Forcing the hiring of specific demographics isn’t going to result in the best possible outcomes in every case but those groups also need opportunities even though they’ve been systemically given worse educations and have been generally shat upon. Removing race we’d also probably hire the white man more often but not because they’re inately better, but rather because they are simply more likely to be able to afford to have pretty looking resumés compared to disadvantaged minorities.

        We wouldn’t need DEI in the first fucking place except people like an old boss, who saw an immigrant classmate of mine’s resumé come up and because of his African last name said “no thanks I want to keep jobs in Canada”, need to be forced to do the right thing. They create the problem and throw temper tantrums when we try to fix it. These people are obstacles and it’s getting tiring.

        TL;DR: They feel as if they have a point because DEI can result in a more qualified person being turned away, which I get feels unfair. However, they refuse to acknowledge the fact that said person was only more qualified because we make it so difficult for minorities to fucking do anything. I’m getting so sick of right-wing bullshit.

        • chuymatt@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Also, DEI is trying to diversify the points of view in the workplace. Homogeny of thought is NOT better when it comes to problem solving. Varied voices can create amazing solutions to problems one didn’t know really existed. If allowed, it builds creativity.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            In my field anyway it’s not about background, it’s shitty managers not listening to anyone and only wanting to hear about how great they are. I am a tall white man and they still don’t wanna here even the littlest bit of polite feedback. I handled them more carefully than children and they still moaned and cried.

            Diversity is good, and I do not think my experience is a reason to not care about it, but removing those worthless bosses is the only thing that will actually allow real change to actually happen.

          • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            The issue with this is you often end up with a diverse group of people who are all very educated and grew up in upper-middle class or even upper class homes. It’s a diversity of race and gender but with everyone having the same values anyway. I’ve seen it myself being the only person in my workplace who grew up poor, you realize how little the rest of it really matters.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 months ago

        YES, it’s insane. It’s like saying “be a decent person” and people going “Fuck you, commie bastards, I do what I want.”

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          From 2020 on we’ve seen that telling people “hey wear the most basic of facemasks when you’re out in public because the morgues are running out of space all over” causes them to start screaming at the Walmart greeters and throwing tantrums like children. We are still stupid apes in a lot of ways

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        The outrage the far-right spun over DEI is by trying to portray it as hiring vastly underqualified applicants simply because of their belonging to an underrepresented group (often even being portrayed as vastly underqualified because of their race as white supremacist rhetoric). Of course in reality this wasn’t true and it was just a foghorn for racism/an ethnic slur, but that’s how it started.

      • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I’ve heard it called “Didn’t Earn It” and the idea is that people are given preferential treatment in job or services based on their ethnicity and not their qualification. As with all things the truth is somewhere in the middle.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Counterpoint: As long as they consider the women “hot” they will accept them as part of the franchise.

      Nichelle Nichols I think was probably hot enough to not draw their ire.

      Those culture warriors are somehow always okay with women they view as “fuckable.” Women only have value in their eyes if they want to sleep with them by their looks alone.

    • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just out of curiosity, what do you think is more progressive: a spaceship where all female crew is forced to wear miniskirts, a bridge crew that has exactly one woman, the part in the pilot where “Orion sex slaves” are introduced in the horniest possible way, or the married producer who was cheating on his wife with the only two relevant female cast members?

      The 1960s was a long time ago. While there are a lot of TOS that aged very well, the idea that the show would be decried as woke is straight up delusional.

        • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Cow pies. “Original Star Trek” clearly referred to TOS.

          If OC meant a modern rendition of classic trek, they wouldn’t be speaking in hypotheticals. They’d just refer to SNW by name.

            • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              So by “original Star Trek” you’re actually referring to a fundamentally different series. This hypothetical version of Star Trek magically keeps everything you like about it, while shedding anything problematic or downright bad.

              The lengths anyone on this site will go to avoid admitting that they made a stupid hot take comment is wild.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nichelle Nichols was at one point thinking of quitting the show but stayed because MLK Jr. himself told her how important her character was.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 months ago

      And without Nichelle Nichols on Star Trek, she wouldn’t have been hired by NASA and then we wouldn’t have had Sally Ride, so she is a legitimate space hero.

  • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 months ago

    They didn’t have everything figured out back then. For one, they bullied Spock for what we could only describe today as his neurodiversity.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 months ago

      The message I got from McCoy was that humans got along because they found new people to be racist against instead of each other

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          And TOS/ENT in particular

          ENT gets bonus points for shran calling humans “pink skins” when Travis is right fucking there on the bridge

      • CatLikeLemming
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s a simple enough message to even get it from Warhammer 40k - Gender? Skin colour? Disabilities? Doesn’t matter, pick up a Lasrifle and start shooting xenos

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And there will be things that are being created today that’s considered progressive that in 20 years, will be considered as missing the mark.

    • Aa!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      You should see the episode when a woman body swapped with Kirk, and how the Enterprise crew suspected something was wrong

      • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        The one I always feel like I need to warn people about is the treatment of Rand in The Enemy Within. Particularly since that happens so early in the series.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      McCoy was racist as shit and would not only have been cashiered, he probably would have been charged for hate speech

  • Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    They were even more upfront about it in TOS for some issues too.

    I remember many instances where they say “We have women in our crew in the future.” It’s not like DISCO flaunted around saying “we don’t hate gay people in this ship.”

    Like I understand that DISCO isn’t everybody’s favorite, and sure it has some issues, but all the flak it got for being “woke” and “preachy” was weird to me.

    Part of Kirk’s whole thing was preachy speeches, and Picard had many moments too.

    • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      I quite agree STD wasn’t everyone’s favourite, in any case it wasn’t mine, although I really tried. But whining about it being woke was just stupid.

    • Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Saying discovery is woke with their crew split in two parts, the queer ones all packed together and then the “normal” ones, seems like a stretch.

      The gay couple basically adopts the non binary one who is in a couple with the trans one, are friends with the gay engineer, but barely even talk to the rest of the crew? Ah and sex scenes between straight people but the most the gay couple gets is sitting next to each other, brushing teeth and a small kiss (not that it’s a bad thing on its own, it forced the writing to actually show a relationship and not just a bunch of sex, which is positive)

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        That did really bother me, shoehorning all the queer people into their own little box after being far more progressive in previous seasons. Literally anyone else on the crew could have adopted Adira (who I didn’t really care much for as a character anyway, she was basically SNW Uhura but not as good an actor), but they had it be Stamets and Culber. How about making it, say, Detmer?

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        but the most the gay couple gets is sitting next to each other, brushing teeth and a small kiss

        While you’re absolutely right, I think the record should show that tooth brushing scene is one of the sexiest scenes in television history. Those two have some serious on-screen chemistry.

        • Solumbran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Once again, the “don’t show too much gay” policy they seem to have forced them to show a relationship through actual intimacy, in contrast to the usual “relationship=sex” that shows usually have (which we can see with most heterosexual relationships in the same show, for example). Even the doctor that is portrayed by an actor that, let’s say, likes to show his body (most of the google results are him half naked) was not sexualized stupidly like they usually would ; a positive thing, except that it’s probably only because they don’t want to “show the gay” (Book for example is always naked and fucking).

          So yeah, taken independently it’s a better relationship image than most relationships in most shows, but in the context it’s pretty horrible.

          • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            So yeah, taken independently it’s a better relationship image than most relationships in most shows, but in the context it’s pretty horrible.

            Absolutely. I think a lot of the audience realize that if they weren’t a gay couple, we would see them with their shirts off together at every opportunity.

            The silver lining is that the actors are so attractive and doing such a beautiful and convincing job, that the omission makes the show runners look prudish and silly.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      The only issue disco has ever actually had is their serialized episodes. People hate on the other shit cause they’re bigots. Its still good Trek. The story is just less flexible.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        I just wish a single ship weren’t saving the Federation/Galaxy/Multiverse every season.

        It also waffles hard between “The important part of the Federation is it’s ideals” and “Section 31 is pretty badass right?”.

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Section 31 is pretty badass, right?

          I have to say, I hated that. It feels like C suite “promote our upcoming show” meddling, to me.

        • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Have yet to see anything outside of DS9 use Section 31 well. It’s inclusion manages to turn what’s supposed to be a hopeful story of the future into just another police procedural that happens to use Star Trek™ branded props

          • turmacar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah it’s nuts how it went from “These are the bad guys. This is antithetical to the point of Star Trek and the Federation.” to “Secret agents in space that can just shoot ‘bad’ guys is cool though right?”

          • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            The single ship thing is annoying and stupid - except, of course, when…

            Spoiler for Picard S3

            when it’s the Enterprise D. When it’s Enterprise D getting a victory lap, common sense can sit this one out while I enjoy it.

            • Sanctus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Okay I can’t say I didnt chug that nostalgia juice on that. I totally did. It was sicc.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        it’s still good Trek

        Everything with Pike and crew and pretty much everyone except Michael is decent Trek. Deus ex Burnham in every century Starfleet exists in is boring as shit and the nacelles not even being attached to the ship anymore is veering into Star Wars level of nonsensical ship design.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          If floating nacelles is what does it for you but you can accept people being torn apart to the atoms and rebuilt somewhere else Idk what to tell ya bud. The saucers detach and float around, idk how that is sensical as it would create unnecessary weak points in the hull of the ship. The worst parts about discovery were how they were stuck trying to tell grand stories instead of being able to focus on the characters much. They didnt have that tight A plot B plot action that Trek does. But it was far from stinky poo poo terrible like most people say.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The only issue disco has ever actually had is their serialized episodes.

        And not spending enough on light bulbs in some episodes. I wondered if my TV was broken, at one point. Lol.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not like DISCO flaunted around saying “we don’t hate gay people in this ship.”

      Well, after DS 9 it would just be repetitive. Also TNG spent a few episodes on this exact point, but it wasn’t a main topic.

      But people tend to focus their complains about things being “preachy” when those things put the preach above the story-telling. DISCO absolutely had this flaw in some point or another. Never for very long, though, so it really wasn’t a main characteristic. Anyway, when a show is simply good, almost nobody gets bothered by the preaching.

    • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t care about the woke nonsense. STD has very few redeeming qualities. Bad writing, bad acting. They spent little to no time flushing out the characters. I guess they didn’t have time what with the universe about to end every 10 minutes. I only watched for Anthony Rapp, Doug Jones and Michelle Yeoh. Everyone else was a stinker or didn’t get enough screen time.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I remember this exact conversation in the show, too.

      “It’s like: Who died and put Aristotle in charge?”

      Points to board “Plato.”

  • kittenzrulz123
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    I havent gotten past the original series yet (I started with that), so far Star Trek seems like the entire point is to get into complex social and political issues that other companies would be too scared to cover.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Hey now hey now!

    It’s a cashless classless society, it’s about economic class justice, too!

    That part’s just more in the background.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not for Sisko it isn’t. I wish I’d been born on the other side of the Bell riots and WW3 but at least we have cool digital watches now

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.

        EDIT: I only noticed the username after I posted this, since it’s clear this is what you were making reference to ha

          • OpenStars@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Have you tried… moving them around?

            What an odd thought though, it’s not like they are the ones unhappy:-).

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    I get not liking Discovery, but do people really think Lower Decks, SNW, Picard are “Woke?”

    Also, obviously, sci-fi is at its best when tackling politics… Isn’t that kinda the point?

  • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    OP what do you think of Discovery?

    I ask this because 9/10 times someone talks about how Star Trek was “always woke”, they are usually just salty people don’t like Discovery and trying to pretend that most people who criticized it were bigots.

    The other 1/10 times it’s someone who doesn’t even watch Star Trek trying to hijack the sub to push a bunch of performative culture war nonsense. However that usually involves a Tumblr post implying the Klingons were socially progressive because of how Kor treated Jadzia Dax.

    • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      You cant take the actions of one Klingon and assume that describes the behavior of the species. That’s racist.

      • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        In the defense of people who constantly post the meme, they’ve never given enough thought to Star Trek to consider that some random Tumblr screen grab isn’t accurate.

        I’m always stunned how many people on this subreddit come off as vocally progressive, but don’t bother actually watching the show. I guess that would take a modicum of effort.

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          they’ve never given enough thought to Star Trek to consider that some random Tumblr screen grab isn’t accurate.

          I don’t know if it’s perfectly captioned, but I clearly remember that moment in DS9 when Dax’s old war buddy reacts to her gender and name change with a repeated big hug and corrected name…so… I’m not sure what we’re getting at here?

          • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The issue is there is always Tumblr text below that implies the Klingon are trans forward.

            First, the trill are not trans. Each symbiote/human pairing is considered a distinct person, albeit one with similar traits to their predecessor. This is emphasized on multiple occasions throughout the show, and is a central plot point in multiple episodes.

            Second, the Klingon are one of the most ass backwards regressive societies in the show. They have a system that’s run by a select few aristocratic houses. They are bound by an ancient honor code that only Worf takes seriously most of the time. Women are explicitly disallowed from serving as the head of their house. The idea that the Klingon society is at all progressive is absolutely divorced from any sort of reality.

            Finally, all of that is present in episode. Jadzia is explicitly told she is not bound by Curzon’s blood oath, because she’s not Curzon. The other two klingons basically spend the entire episode implying that as a human woman she’s not capable and shouldn’t be here. At the end Jadzia hesitates to kill the Albino in a way that Curzon never would.

            It’s incredibly obvious that people who post that meme have not watched DS9, including the episode they are referencing. Instead, they are leveraging a Star Trek fan sub to push low effort pro LGBT memes.

            It’s not the pro LGBT part that pisses me off. 90s Trek is progressive of LGBT issues. It’s the fact that they didn’t even bother watching the show. These people make being queer their entire identity, are in a star trek sub, and are too lazy to actually watch the fucking show.

            • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The issue is there is always Tumblr text below that implies the Klingon are trans forward.

              Discussion aside, I completely agree. Folks who swallow that take that are in for a shock when they watch the show, lol!

            • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              First, the trill are not trans.

              Yes, but Trill are every bit as trans as the network censors have allowed, at every stage of writing for them.

              The idea that the Klingon society is at all progressive is absolutely divorced from any sort of reality.

              Yeah. That’s just silly. Klingon culture is deeply regressive, and has been falling into worse states for longer than human history.

              But the individual Klingon from that scene is a progressive ( for a Klingon ).

              It’s the fact that they didn’t even bother watching the show.

              I think that’s a bit unfair. People can watch the episode and still leave it with that moment as the shining in their memory as the stand-out.

              That episode is an early win in LGBT representation. It’s about challenges that come from having a nuanced gender identity while everyone else has heavy gender coded expectations.

              Taking away “let’s all please strive to achieve the bare minimum example by a mildly progressive Klingon” is a great lesson.

              It’s hardly the only meme that brushes aside the complexities of an episode to highlight a key moment.

              I get the frustration of newbies flooding into a Star Trek forum, but then, that’s always been a big part of the point of the show! They’ll watch more of the show over time, even while parts of it won’t age well. And we will have new things to discuss. Lol.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      how Kor treated Jadzia Dax.

      For anyone who wasn’t there, this moment was revolutionary, at the time.

      “What should I even say if my friend comes out to me as Transgender?!” wasn’t something everyone knew an answer to.

      Having any character (Klingon or otherwise) handle learning that their friend’s gender has changed, and react in a healthy way, on screen, on prime time television, was an important positive moment for a lot of clueless future-ally scifi fans.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Since when does wokism have meaning? Its just something the right uses to describe everything they dont like, like equal rights.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      in a technical sense? yes.

      in a practical sense? it’s superficial, generally without any actual actions to address anything about it. they will praise a company for plopping rainbows on everything ONLY during the exact days of pride month while funding Christian gay conversion camps