• orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Right right. They’re talking about it now, long after they should have taken serious action. Better late than never, but better early than late. And this problem goes back two decades FFS.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Because it’s a fucking cartel.

    It’s literally just cartel price fixing done through the medium of “a mysterious algorithm.”

    • RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      In August, the Department of Justice filed an antitrust suit against the company, alleging its pricing algorithm allows landlords to collectively push rents higher.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I meant more about rents than the antitrust suit. It’s all well and good to hold the company accountable; meanwhile, rents have already been artificially inflated, and they don’t go down.

          • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I always hear this about building more housing, but I see a lot of new housing around me which sits empty because it is not affordable.

            • allthelolcats@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              The benefit of market rate housing is that it hopefully will be occupied, allowing for higher income earners to move into a more expensive unit and freeing up an older lower cost unit. In a perfect world this works like a chain and eventually lower cost older units become more available. Building “affordable” or “low income housing” isn’t really appealing to developers without financial incentives.

              This does all assume speculators do not buy the newer housing and sit on it as an investment. More housing being built is generally all a good thing and it needs to outpace the population growth to have an effect on pricing. So even if there is plenty of new housing if it’s not being built quick enough prices will continue to rise.

              If the units are sitting empty as speculation/investments that’s an issue for government (and especially local government, so get out and vote locally!)

              • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                The benefit of market rate housing is that it hopefully will be occupied, allowing for higher income earners to move into a more expensive unit and freeing up an older lower cost unit.

                But this assumes people are moving up the ladder. In 2024 this does not appear to generally be the case, but the system remains skewed to high earners.

                (Not asking a question, just thinking out loud I guess)

                • allthelolcats@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Definitely, it’s easy for a large investor to build new market rate housing, buddy up with a pricing algorithm, and maximize profit. Then they sit until either all the other housing comes up in price or they eventually find someone willing to stomach the price.

                  Speaking from my own experience it took me a long time to move into a better apartment, not because I couldn’t afford it, but because there simply wasn’t enough housing that felt like a good value. So I sat in an apartment that was great but didn’t suit all my needs, and when I finally moved that older less expensive unit became available. If there was more newer housing, or more options in general, then maybe I would have moved quicker and that older unit could have been turned over to someone that needed it more sooner.

                  I guess my point is that part of it is the speed at which all this can happen is dependent on how much housing there is. And I’m also not saying market rate housing is the solution either. I think affordable housing, co-ops, etc. being part of the mix creates a more fair housing market.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      “The Previous Corrupt White House did one Good Thing by recognizing the Great Benefit to Landlords, the True American People™, this Software provides! That’s why I, Donald Jesus Trump Lord God King Your Savior, will require all Real Estate Transactions to use these Wonderful Inventions!”