• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It has well over that plus a decent amount of quality of life features.

    Die hard Windows users don’t want to change

    • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Lol, actually a Linux user, but I do fear change. And to be fair, I don’t have accurate stats for feature parity percentage. Maybe it is above 70%. And I actually do use the Settings app often when I have to deal with Windows at work. So I get that it’s actually not terrible, and is slowly getting better.

      Regardless, let me just add a secondary IP address to a network interface so I can access a network device using a different IP scheme without losing access to the internet. Oh wait… Settings doesn’t have that feature… It opens Control Panel…

      Well, that’s just one instance, no biggie. Now I just need to create partitions on a new disk… Settings got my back right? Oh… No… It needs to open Disk Management…

      Whatever, that’s pretty rare anyway. Just gotta rename this printer. Oh, launches control panel again…

      My point is this, having to navigate what settings have been migrated, what settings haven’t, and what have been disabled just to force users to try Settings, is a bad experience. Its not fearing change, its growing pains. Just telling people that “control panel is being depreciated” doesn’t solve the fact that this swap is currently making the situation harder, not easier. I look forward to the day where I don’t have to wonder where to find the settings I need to access again.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Leave it to Microsoft to make settings open control panel and control panel open settings.

        Terrible design

        I kind of forgot about that since I haven’t used Windows in a while.