The sheer number of videos taken “the wrong way round” (for my computer’s monitor) is mind-boggling. I get that some people watch videos on their phones, but is it really that many?

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wouldn’t even mind vertical videos that much, but the real fucking cancer are vertical videos with baked-in black borders for 16:9 ratio, so you can’t view them comfortably on anything and the resolution is like 1/4 of the original.

    Bonus if those borders are also filled with ads or other annoying bullshit.

    • danielton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t know why creators even do that with the black borders… you can’t even watch those on a phone. Annoys the crap out of me.

  • Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    YouTube started monetizing Shorts and reduced the payouts to regular long form YouTube videos which is anything wide screen and over 60 seconds. It’s pretty much forcing content creators to start doing Shorts if they want to try and not lose as much revenue

    • Saturdaycat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      TIL, that’s just screwed. Sometimes short form content can be interesting, but 99% of the time I want a video I can watch along to. It’s terrible and I don’t understand the intense appeal these have. Didn’t Vine start it all?

      • decentralized@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think there has been a major culture shift. YouTube used to prioritize the subscriber feed where you curated your own content. Now it is the home feed where it is fed by algorithm. Shorts seems to be an extension of this where it is pretty much non stop algorithmic feed. If you were used to the old way the new way seems strange, but if not I guess the new way is more intuitive? I couldn’t say

      • dipbeneaththelasers@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t know that there’s actual appeal outside of the fact that the format seems to be optimized to give our lizard brains the quick hit. There isn’t anything inherently wrong with divided attention - we don’t think it’s bad when we’re having a conversation while watching fish in a pond, for example - but I think Vine, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube Shorts et al are the result of years of data corporations honing in on capitalizing our attention.

    • Negative_Pair_5694@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      For uBlock:

      ! YT Homepage - Hide the Shorts section
      youtube.com##[is-shorts]
      ! YT Menu - Hide the Shorts button
      www.youtube.com###guide [title="Shorts"], .ytd-mini-guide-entry-renderer[title="Shorts"]
      ! YT Search - Hide Shorts
      www.youtube.com##ytd-search ytd-video-renderer [overlay-style="SHORTS"]:upward(ytd-video-renderer)
      ! YT Search and Channels - Hide the Shorts sections
      www.youtube.com##ytd-reel-shelf-renderer
      ! YT Channels - Hide the Shorts tab
      www.youtube.com##ytd-browse[page-subtype="channels"] [role="tab"]:nth-of-type(3):has-text(Shorts)
      ! YT Subscriptions - Hide Shorts - Grid View
      www.youtube.com##ytd-browse[page-subtype="subscriptions"] ytd-grid-video-renderer [overlay-style="SHORTS"]:upward(ytd-grid-video-renderer)
      ! YT Subscriptions - Hide Shorts - List View
      www.youtube.com##ytd-browse[page-subtype="subscriptions"] ytd-video-renderer [overlay-style="SHORTS"]:upward(ytd-item-section-renderer)
      ! YT Sidebar - Hide Shorts
      www.youtube.com###related ytd-compact-video-renderer [overlay-style="SHORTS"]:upward(ytd-compact-video-renderer)
      
      
      • theJWPHTER88@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Seems quite extensive, but… do I place some and/or all of it on the “My rules” or “My filters” tab on uBlock?

        • Negative_Pair_5694@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I don’t think that would work. PiHole works on a DNS level and has no insight to the encrypted connection to Youtube. So it cannot see or modify the site content on the fly. uBlock Origin basically can (beside DNS based blocking) modify the websites’ code after it has loaded into your browser.

      • Hedup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Doesn’t seem to work. Do I need to restart? I still see #shorts videos in my sub feed.

        I’m using uBlock Origin.

    • Ignacio@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      “Enhacer for YouTube” (a Firefox extension, and maybe Chromium too) hides shorts for good.

        • Ignacio@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          When I search for a video, they appear too. But there is no menu option for shorts in the left sidebar, and they don’t appear in your home or subscription page either.

  • z3n0x@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because corporate enshittification aka “mobile first”, “stories” etc.

    • hydra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Mobile first is a good, valid approach for responsive UI. But these amateur webdevs do mobile ONLY neglecting other UI densities and form factors so all corporate websites look like half-assed phone apps. Not to mention the usage of bloated frameworks to save time.

  • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not keen on vertical content if it’s anything more than a few seconds. This portrait-first approach really seems to have taken off with YouTube Shorts, Instagram and TikTok but for long form videos it’s a no-go

  • McBinary@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I would assume because most videos are taken from mobile now. Camera quality in phones is crazy good now.

    • Cevilia (she/they/…)OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean, like I suspect for most people, my phone is my camera too, but it’s perfectly capable of taking landscape videos.

      • decentralized@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think this is going to be a generational divide. Most of my millennial friends will insist on landscape while zoomers tend to default to portrait.

      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        My Moto G Stylus even does landscape videos with the phone held vertical. Moto gets me.

      • Ataraxia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Right. I only take vertical if I’m showing a tree or a plant but for a scene or most other pics it’s horizontal.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yes mobile devices have far surpassed desktop / laptop computers in usage numbers as of years ago. Landscape was probably the preferred video format for a long time because it works for both mobile and desktop but the mobile dominance is so high at this point in life that I’ll bet no one cares.

    • Ataraxia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      On my phone I prefer landscape though. I don’t watch any videos in portrait so I skip them. It’s no effort to flip the phone sideways lol…

      • minorninth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think it’s about short-form vs long-form content.

        For casual short videos like TikTok or random shorts that scroll by in Facebook, Instagram, or YouTube, portrait makes sense because most people have their phone in that orientation.

        For long-form video, landscape is still the norm.

  • Osvaldoilustrador@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Although funny enough, after shorts showing up and getting big attention, I noticed more and more youtubers making longer and longer videos, as if they were trying to go to the polar opposite of shorts

  • danielton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because people take videos with their phones and apparently don’t know you can hold phones in landscape (or just don’t want to… most people I know leave auto-rotation turned off, which I don’t understand; it is something I always loved about modern smartphones)

  • andyMFK@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Today’s younger generation mostly watch content on their phones, Instagram, tik tok, YouTube etc. They’re holding their phone portrait to view this content so that’s how they produce content. And that’s a popular demographic to target so yeah, it’s catching on for better or worse

  • snerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    The overwhelming majority of internet users do so on mobile devices (92%+) and the majority of internet traffic is to mobile devices (55-60% depending on who you ask).

    It’s also to the point where it’s not uncommon for people to not even own a desktop or laptop anymore unless they have a specific need for it. Instead phones and tablets are much more common among people who only ever used computers for casual internet browsing.

  • Osvaldoilustrador@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    they try hard to beat tiktok, that’s why, and every new feature gets a huge reach, which makes people use it more and more. it kinda sucks ngl