• twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Let’s not cherrypick scenarios to try and pretend Linux is easier than Windows. Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options, never mind putting them into a terminal window where they could seriously fuck up their machine. What about clicking the download link on a webpage, clicking next a few times and having them software on your machine, compared to having to build something from GitHub (how many people here have never had to do that?).

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 month ago

      This applies to pretty much all “Linux good, Win/MacOS bad” memes. I just assume that people either aren’t really serious about them and it’s just tongue in cheek, or they don’t have any contact with regular people.

      I used to work as a(n assistant to the) sysadmin and the things I got called over never stopped to amaze. For instance, there was a case when software was updated on the work machines and I got called because some lady couldn’t use Adobe Acrobat. “It is asking me something, I don’t know what”. I come over and it’s just a TOS Accept/Decline window.

      Some people do not understand computers to an extent that they can lock up in a state of confusion when a button has been moved 100px in any direction from its usual position.

        • oo1@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Naah, i think they’re just ragebaiting all the MS fanboys.

          It works too judging by all the shit in this forum.

          The meme isn’t funny; but some of the reactions it provokes are hilarious. Though some of them are obviously counter-ragebait too. “Akshually i never have to restart to update windows since 2008”. :)

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 month ago

      Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options, never mind putting them into a terminal window where they could seriously fuck up their machine

      Maybe this is a problem that we should be addressing, rather than just making technology more of a black box, and raising generations of people who have no fucking concept of how any of it works.

      • Exec@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        and raising generations of people who have no fucking concept of how any of it works

        Only two generations were got to be technologically literate.

        • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Greatest and Silent generations helped create computing, Boomers helped create important software such as DOS, Gen X and Millennials helped develop the Web, Gen Z is still going into computing and development jobs and Gen Alpha is too young to consider

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you have a driver’s license, do you know a car works besides the basic maintenance that is checking your oil and keeping the tires inflated? Some people don’t even do that last one, while it’s a thing you should check regularly.

        I think it’s a good thing the general public is able to use a computer without knowing the inner workings, but it also shouldn’t be obscured from them if they want to know/learn.

      • twinnie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        But this is the classic Linux user mentality; Linux shouldn’t get easier, users should get smarter.

        If computers can be easier to use then why should people instead sacrifice loads of time learning how to operate them? Most people have other things to be getting on with.

    • aski3252@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 month ago

      Unless you have a system without a GUI, you don’t need to open a terminal in order to update or install stuff. There is a GUI for that. And no, you don’t need to build stuff from GitHub for normal user stuff…

      • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I tried that on linux, it doesn’t work if you want to do more than browse the web and other basic stuff.

        You can do some seriously advanced stuff on windows using only GUIs

        • aski3252@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          We were talking about normal user stuff that normal users do, not “seriously advanced stuff”… And I agree that most normal users probably don’t want to use terminals because they are not familiar with them. But normal users probably don’t and shouldn’t do “seriously advanced stuff”, no?

          Yes, if you are trying to do “serously advanced stuff” (whatever that means), chances are you will probably need a terminal (or a terminal will at least be easier), but you shouldn’t be doing “seriously advanced stuff” unless you know what you are doing anyway…

          • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            I just wanted to install steam, but it wasn’t in the package manager list.

            Then I tried apt-get and that didnt work, I forgot why.

            You don’t have to do seriously advanced stuff on linux to run into issues without using the terminal.

            My point was, even if you actually do some advanced stuff on windows you still don’t have to use the terminal.

            It’s not realistic that you don’t have to use the terminal on linux if you want to do any more than web browsing and some text editing, etc.

            That doesn’t mean that linux is bad, but let’s be realistic about what it is.

            • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 month ago

              That experience is highly dependent on the Linux distro you’re using. Steam comes preinstalled on gaming-centric distros like Nobara or Pop!_OS. More “general purpose” distros like Mint or Ubuntu might require adding an apt repository before you can install steam from their GUI package managers, but adding an apt repo can be easily accomplished with a GUI as well.

              Basically, if there’s no guide for installing steam for a given distro, or the process of installing steam is more than a couple easy steps, that specific distro probably isn’t well suited to run steam.

            • Tin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              Weird, I would expect Steam to be in the Ubuntu repos (assuming that’s what you were using, since you mention apt), but maybe not. As for apt, or apt-get, they are just the terminal equivalent of the GUI package manager (synaptic? it’s been a minute since I ran ubuntu), so if something isn’t in the repos, apt at the terminal won’t find it either. If it’s not in the repos, you should be able to download and install steam from the website just like you would in windows. It gives you a .deb file which will launch just like an executable installer in Ubuntu. But to your point, yes, sometimes things in linux take a little extra thinking to get to work. Getting accustomed to the way Linux works can help overcome hiccups like this. Windows has many quirks as well, it’s just that if you use WIndows often you know your way around them.

            • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              To install Steam on most distros with popular DE’s, you click the software store to open the software store. If Steam isn’t listed in the front page then just click the search box and start typing Steam.

              When you see it, click the install button.

              When it is done open it by clicking the Open button or pressing the Windows (or Super) key and type Steam. Click it when you see it.

              • aski3252@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                28 days ago

                Even if it is, for whatever reason, not part of the repository you have installed, you can still go on steam’s website and download the package from there… In other words, the worst case scenario is literally the same experience as you would have on windows…

            • aski3252@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              28 days ago

              I just wanted to install steam, but it wasn’t in the package manager list.

              Maybe you used Debian, which only allows free software in their default repo? But then you won’t be able to just install it with apt either. But even if it is not in the repository, you could still go on steam website and download the package from there, so literally the same experience as on windows…

              You don’t have to do seriously advanced stuff on linux to run into issues without using the terminal.

              Like what?

              It’s not realistic that you don’t have to use the terminal on linux if you want to do any more than web browsing and some text editing, etc.

              10 years ago, or maybe even 5 years ago, I would have agreed with you. Not anymore though, not if you use a half-way beginner friendly distro…

              • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                27 days ago

                Yup, it was debian. I think I tried adding another repo, but gave up before I got it to work. I didn’t try to just download the file, because I had done that before and all I could do is extract whatever is inside the file, but not install it.

                It was around 2 years ago, maybe Linux has gotten that much more user friendly in the last two years, but I doubt it.

                • aski3252@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  I use and love debian a lot for servers because it is super stable and relatively lightweight, but I definitely would not recommend it for desktops/notebooks, especially not to people new to linux based systems.

                  It’s super purist about foss, which means you only get free and open source software (no steam, discord, etc) per default and it uses an older kernel (which makes it more stable, but less feature rich and less compatible with new hardware).

                  If you use something like fedora, linux mint (as far as I heard) or even ubuntu, your experience would probably be a lot better.

    • babybus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      Let’s not cherrypick scenarios to try and pretend Linux is easier than Windows. Most normal people are…

      Let’s not cherry pick users then. I don’t care about your normal users. My experience is better on Linux.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Let’s not cherry pick users then. I don’t care about your normal users. My experience is better on Linux.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Let’s also not conflate “ease” with historical behavior.

      Taking previous experience out of the equation, it is easier to type apt upgrade and reboot to update your entire system than to click through 300 times in the system and multiple apps with reboots.

      That is a fact.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options

      Sadly no. They should be nervous if it’s about making changes to their system. In reality however Windows conditioned them to just click the button labeled “Yes” or “Okay” without even reading the pop-up in the first place.

    • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Compiling from GitHub is cherry picking the worst case especially for “most normal people” and frankly they should be using the software store GUI in their DE to install and update software with nice easy buttons to click.

      Frankly software management for a normal person generally is easier on Linux than it is on Windows for stuff made to run on Linux.

      But don’t worry someone will respond with nvidia’s shitty proprietary drivers.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Most normal people only ever use the browser. Even image or video editing is niche for the average person

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Eh, Windows complaints tend to get pretty hyperbolic much of the time. It’s slow and annoying but I’ve always worked with it

      But the description of the Linux update process matches my experience with mint, pretty much. I even use the GUI update utility because it will put a little icon in the bottom corner of the screen. It’s quick even if I’m using a program that’s going an update, and if the kernel gets updated it’s just like “hey remember to reboot buddy!”

    • needanke@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Besides missing dependencies or repositories for more nice software this kinda closely matches my experience though.

      (Ignoring winget, becaust it is not really the mainstream way to install windows software)

      What is your specific issue with this?

        • needanke@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 month ago

          I still (have to) download scetchy executables on Windows when I want to install most programms, while on debian I can install most programs via apt and a few repositories. Even when it’s not a standard repo I still prefer it over random executables because while the security is just as bad at least I get updates without having to open the program itself.

          But what resonated with me most have been the restarts for updates. Happened way to often that I wanted to stop working but cant just shut down windows without updates and the accompanying reboots. (If I don’t check up in between to decrypt the disk on startups it’ll just sit there and run out the battery and I have to do the restarts on the next workday). On debian I just klick the power button, it hibernates (or I shut it down if I’m in the mood) and os updates are completely seperate from that.

          • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 month ago

            What sketchy executables are you downloading?

            What makes downloading steam from valve more sketchy than allowing a Linux repo to run arbitrary code as root on your machine for every single one of thousands of pieces of software maintained by strangers?

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              I remember going to source forge to download MPC-BE

              Later found out that they were adding adware to executables

            • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              All software is maintained by strangers.

              Some software websites just look sketchy but aren’t, which makes it harder for people to filter out the actual sketchy ones. That’s just the reality. Jokes about download pages with 4 download buttons also didn’t come falling out of the sky.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Literally

      My desktop/laptop experience for both is as follows:

      Windows update, at least since the inception of the concept has never required me to go to a browser (unless you count w98 “everything is a website” concept for the desktop or the far in between instances were a PC was offline/having issues and you need to download update packages)

      It also updated windows applications (ie office) but yeah it never intended to upgrade other stuff, all other software had their own auto update check

      I’ll concede the restart because yeah it does all for that

      But yeah Linux install is not without issues, and I’ll just remind everyone of how difficult it was/is to install a component driver when it’s not automatically found (wifi cards, disk controllers, and Realtek drivers anyone?)

      Yeah it does update your apps, as long as you have the repos, and restart wise I distinctively remember that you do need to do restarts after updates, be it major distro or not.

      Simple commands? I’ll concede that, as long as we remember the average Linux user is used to a less user friendly experience. Complain ask you want but for the average user, windows update experience works

      Thankfully I don’t need to deal with all that stuff now

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I haven’t had a driver issue except for Nvidia where the driver exists, but it sucks

        • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          NVIDIA is the second biggest wankstain of a thing on my computer, unfortunately AMD didn’t put high end GPUs in laptops so there wasn’t a whole lot of choice.

      • FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Windows update, at least since the inception of the concept has never required me to go to a browser

        In xp it still was an website which required IE due to activex used to do the updates.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I maintain a bunch of PC’s and 2 of them won’t update anymore with some vague error code that only has a microsoft community forum post as search result. I’ll get it fixed, but Windows update is not quite flawless and a non tech person would be lost at this point.

        People seem to be having a hard time grasping that most of the time it works great on both Windows and Linux. Majority of people will have a solid experience. But on both platforms, when things go to shit, you need to get your hands dirty. And with that final thought, I like to add that because of it’s openness, is usually easier to troubleshoot an issue on Linux because it doesn’t obscure what it’s doing unlike Windows (“Please wait…”, “Setting things up”, … dafuq u doin, it says 100%, is it doing anything still or is it hanging?). Windows’ vagueness has been a pet peeve of mine and it’s only getting worse. I’m perfectly ok shielding it by default, but give me a verbose option.

      • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Only thing I can think of is installations that include drivers. And even then, not all of them.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              If you kill explorer.exe manually it doesn’t respawn. You have to star the process yourself again.

              Unless something changed in the past year.

                • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  No. It’s not. I spun up a vm and killed explorer.exe. How long should I be waiting? Cause I"m several minutes in and explorer hasn’t restarted itself yet. Also tested it on my VR computer (only non-linux physical machine in the house).

                  Here I’ll even stream it for you. <removed>. I kill the process at basically 16:00(MST) it’s been 5 minutes now and the stream is going.

                  Edit: Over 19 minutes now… Still waiting for it to restart…

                  Edit2: Over an hour now… Still waiting for it to automatically restart. BTW the machine is windows 11. Latest patch/update.

                  Edit3: pulling the stream. Ran it for over 4 hours. The point is proven. It doesn’t restart itself.

  • tsugu@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Open terminal

    See whether the app is in my distro’s repos, flathub, or snapcraft (It’s not)

    Go on the internet, search up the app’s name

    Download the AppImage (might be a virus)

    LibFuse2 is not installed (fuck me)

    Install LibFuse2

    Install Gearlever to integrate AppImage into my desktop

    I can finally launch the app

    • bamboo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Fuck, I hate AppImages so much. Never heard of gearlever, thanks i hope this helps a lot.

      Edit: Ok Gearlever is pretty great! Now I can finally open Heroic normally. That pissed me off for so long.

    • lseif@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      > doesn’t use arch/nix

      “why cant i find my package in the repos?”

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ah yes, downloading builds from unvetted third parties and running their installers as root. Truly the Linux way.

          • jim3692@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            People can also use the Nix package manager on any distro, and run their apps using nix-shell, so that they don’t need to install as root.

        • lseif@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          and this is different to windows how …?

          u do realize that u can (and should) read the PGKBUILD file? and check the git url which it’s cloning. or check the sha if its a binary package.

        • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Clicking yes on the windows prompt for elevated rights for the installer to move things forward. Truly the Windows way.

          People don’t even read the prompts anymore, clicking yes as soon as it appears. So much better.

    • stetech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Even if that’s needed, you can update apps w/o reboot usually (when sandboxed), and move opened files around (seriously wtf, Windows)…

      • tsugu@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        When the hell would I need to update my Windows because of an app update? I only restart when there is a system update, which you have to do on Linux too if you want your kernel to stay up to date.

        • stetech@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, it was what happened the last time I touched Windows in ‘22 (for work) – maybe a policy thing that a corporate app had elevated access and that’s why it forced a reboot on me for (some of the) “regular” app updates?

            • stetech@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Good to challenge misconceptions regularly, so thank you! :D

              On that topic… I assume not being able to move opened files (my “go-to” use case was a PDF in Acrobat) is still unfixed though, right? Seems like that’d require a major OS and applications change to be made possible.

              • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Why would you want to mv, not cp, a file that is actively opened by a file system. Is that even possible on Linux? I could swear I’m regularly blocked from manipulating things with open file descriptors.

                • stetech@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Like tsugu said. Have a file open for editing or whatever and realizing you’d like it to go into another directory. Of course you could just wait until you’re done and then move, or close, move and re-open… but that’s less convenient (e.g. throwing away current file’s edit history) and/or a risk of forgetting to actually do it, at least for me, lol.

                  Not sure about Linux, but I grew up on Unix (macOS), which forces applications (at least GUI based ones, CLI apps do whatever they want) to be able to deal with this, so that’s why I expected Windows to be able to do that as well. Alas…

              • tsugu@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                That I can confirm. Windows won’t let me move files if any app is using them. I sometimes do it by accident when I’m editin an office document, realize it’s in the wrong folder so I try to drag it to Documents. That won’t work. But I got used to it pretty quickly.

        • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, true.

          The whole “OS update when I want an app update” is because of how dependencies work on Linux. A library is installed once and referenced by any app that wants to use it. This way, an update in the library benefits all apps using it, as bugs het fixed. Also less storage is used when the one library is used by many apps.

          Windows programs keep their own versions of a library and hard link to that one. That makes the app more flexible. You can copy the app and it’s dependencies around and it will keep working. In this scenario multiple copies/versions of the same library can exist in the system, which takes more space.

          Of course there is some nuance. Both operating systems can have/use shared or hard linked libraries, but this is the general gist of it.

  • hinterlufer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    somepackage requires otherpackage version >10.1.79

    otherpackage is already at latest version

    Have fun compiling it yourself and messing up what is managed by the package manager and what’s not. And don’t forget that the update might break some other package along the way

      • Farid@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Don’t use apostrophes wherever you see an “s” at the end of a word. If you’re unsure about whether or not to use an apostrophe, just don’t. Because statistically, there are far fewer cases where you need 'em than there are cases where you don’t. Plus if you missed the apostrophe where it should be, people will just assume you didn’t bother to type it or it was a typo. Whereas if you do type it where it shouldn’t be, it’s a clear case of “this person doesn’t know how apostrophes work”.

    • TunaCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Most of the time you can just download a release and place the binary in path (or a symlink).

      Compiling it yourself should not ‘messing up’ anything, it should build locally:

      ./configure
      make -j$(nproc)
      

      Now it’s just built, nothing on your system has changed. make install will place requisite files where they need to go, but this generally configurable via prefix or equivalent. You may need to install dependencies, but that’s usually a simple exercise in reading the output from the configuration step.

      Compiling software is easy as fuck and is incredibly flexible.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Huh, pacman always seemed to automatically work out those dependency loops, or whatever you want to call them, when I was on EndeavourOS. The only time I had an issue with updating was when I went like two weeks without updating, and then ran out of harddrive space halfway through installing the 600 updates.

      I’ve been running Bazzite for several months now, and updating is absurdly easy and unintrusive. It’s basically impossible to fuckup (and if you do, it’s extremely simple to rollback). I can really see immutable/atomic being the future of Linux.

      • hinterlufer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well not if you’re on Ubuntu and need the latest version of e.g. npm for some nvim plugin, because that version is not in the repository.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I sometimes just give up and use Docker or a Flatpak (depending on if it’s a CLI or GUI app)

  • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Edge (Microsoft browser) thinks the Microsoft Teams exe installer FROM MICROSOFT SERVER is malware, no joke.

      • lancalot@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Honestly, in terms of ease to play, SteamOS (or clones like Bazzite) don’t do under fall short of Windows. Heck, I’d argue they might even be easier.

        The real issue is anti-cheat. But that’s just the next hurdle we’ll have to overcome.


        Edit: TIL that the expression “to do under” has no place in English.

          • lancalot@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Apologies. Allow me to clarify.

            I meant that it’s not harder than Windows, when it comes to playing games. And I even made that claim stronger by proclaiming that it’s probably even easier.

            Edit: SteamOS is the operating system found on the Steam Deck. It’s basically Arch Linux (btw), but with Valve’s (very) special sauce. It’s what you’d expect from your average game console; which is a good thing*.

        • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Another alternative for your expression might be ‘to do less’ as i steamos doesn’t do less than windows. Or ‘do worse than’. I would say even ‘steamos doesnt under-do windows in terms of gaming’ would work but it sounds more awkward. Mind if i ask what language the expression ‘do under’ is from? Its neat, i like it. English sucks in a lot of ways. Also agree with everything you said about OSes. I had tried linux in the past but mostly stuck to windows for gaming, then i got a steam deck and ill never install windows ever again.

          • lancalot@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Or ‘do worse than’.

            I think I like this one as well. Basically, as you’ll see later on, the expression is (probably) best translated as ‘to be inferior’. Combined with the negation that’s brought with “don’t”, we could rephrase the sentence as ‘Honestly, in terms of ease to play, SteamOS (or clones like Bazzite) aren’t inferior to Windows.’.

            ‘steamos doesnt under-do windows in terms of gaming’

            Another one that I like 😜. But, the double ‘do’ is indeed a bit awkward.

            Mind if i ask what language the expression ‘do under’ is from?

            Sure! It’s an expression found in Dutch. Heck, to be more precise, it’s a verb that can be split: ‘onderdoen’, but also ‘doen onder’. The literal translation would be, as you’d expect ‘underdo’ or ‘do under’. Here’s the (English) wiktionary entry.

            Also agree with everything you said about OSes. I had tried linux in the past but mostly stuck to windows for gaming, then i got a steam deck and ill never install windows ever again.

            Valve has truly outdone itself. While I only started using Linux after Proton’s release, the horror stories from the pre-Proton era still send shivers down my spine.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        They are. I have about the same success rate with Proton and WINE(via Heroic Launcher) as to when I still duel booted Windows. If you’re talking about games with rootkit anticheats, I never played those in Windows anyway.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I just use Mint. Just think of Proton as a feature of Steam. I just pick a game from my Steam library and select Force Compatibility mode on and install. Heroic Launcher (for GoG and some other things) is a few more steps, but I didn’t need a guide to figure it out. Heroic lets you choose either Proton or WINE, so I installed Steam first to minimize confusion.

            Oh, and another nice feature of Heroic is that it will grab the Linux binary if it’s available somewhere even if that binary isn’t available on GoG. I was surprised that it grabbed the native client for Factorio instead of the windows version that’s on GoG.

              • TheSalarian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                That completely depends on the game. Many play just as well if not better, some play worse or not at all. Check out a site called ProtonDB for a huge list of games and their level of playability.

              • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                Probably, but I’m already running ancient hardware and I tend to favor retro and indie games, so I’m not the best to ask about that. Some people do report better performance under Proton though. Windows has a lot of bloat that doesn’t exist with WINE/Proton running in Linux.

              • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                The overhead added by Proton, compared to the CPU time consumed by the actual game, is minimal. The greatest benefit is that you don’t have dozens of Windows services hogging half of your memory and CPU.

                Some games have some quirks that can cause performance issues when running under Proton. Deathloop, for example, was good on Windows, but unplayable on Linux with the same hardware (Ryzen 5 2600, 16G RAM, RX 6750 XT). There was massive stuttering even on minimum graphics, and every level took several minutes to load. It works now, but since then I’ve upgraded to a 7800X3D, so I’m probably just brute-forcing my way through the same issues.

          • SqueakyBeaver
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            Proton comes with steam, and you can get other versions on top of it if you want.

            If you’ve got steam, you can run games through proton very easily

      • Tin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Most games on Steam work just fine when you turn on Proton. Gaming on linux has come a long way.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean they are. I game constantly and use a Linux only machine. The only games that don’t work are crappy anti cheat games from Epic. And they are crappy. So who cares?

        I duel booted just for those and it wasn’t worth the headache. Linux is far superior in every way.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This kind of reads as being addicted to the smell of your own farts?

      Nothing in that godawful, arcane, confusing black screen with white text is ever going to be better than clicking on buttons that have English words I can actually understand.

      If you were raised by the matrix and like doing things the hard way with memorized commands, that’s fine with me and kind of cool in a way, but it is definitely the hard way.

  • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can’t remember the last time I got a DLL error on my Windows laptop, honestly. I don’t think that’s ever happened on my current computer.

    • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Winget sucks ass. Fails half of the time, lists way too much I did not install through Winget m, even had apps broken because of bad updates through Winget.

      Never had these problems with scoop or chocolatey though.

      • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        That sucks. I use it to handle all software on my work dev machine and haven’t had any issues so far. We basically use it to set up clean machines and it’s worked perfectly so far.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        lists way too much I did not install through Winget

        That’s one of the features though. You can update apps via Winget even if you didn’t originally install them via Winget.

  • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What the actual fuck are you smoking?

    At least update this meme to the 2010s if you won’t go to the 2020s

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t know about all the arguing and snark, but… I’ve been using Ubuntu (laugh it up) on my work laptop for the last 3ish years, and the vast majority of the time it really is “click install updates. wait 2 minutes. ok every program on your computer is up to date, just don’t forget to restart Firefox”. Can’t think of a time where updating sucked. Sometimes I even go through the terminal just because it makes me feel cool to be a hackerman.

    I dread updating my windows pc at home. Cuts into my WoW time too much.

    • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve switched over a year ago and that’s the thing that, looking back, sticks out to me the most as well. It’s just insane that practically every application I used had its own update routine. Lesser used apps I had to update every single time before using them. Just constant interruptions everywhere.

      Winget is a step in the right directions, but it still has to build upon and work around that same shaky foundation, and it shows.

    • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Coincidentally my windows PC needed to update when I got back to it. It took like 15 minutes and 2 restarts. I legit pulled out my Ubuntu laptop and Sudo apt-get upgraded that bitch just to flex on Bill Gates.

  • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Been using Linux off and on since 2003-ish. I remember the days of having to compile applications and having to download various dependencies. Linux now is so streamlined and easy. Minus gentoo.

    • Luffy879@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What? Once you set up gentoo properly, its as if not more streamlined than other distros

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    IDK, but I more often had issues with installing apps to Linux than to Windows, usually dependency-hell related ones, but once I had trouble enabling snap on Linux Mint.

  • VonVoelksen@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t like windows either, but updating with Winget in terminal works pretty good. Not as good as with Linux, but better than downloading every app via browser.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Chocolatey is the best option I’ve found for this on Windows:

    Chocolatey was created by Rob Reynolds in 2011 with the simple goal of offering a universal package manager for Windows. Chocolatey is an open source project that provides developers and admins alike a better way to manage Windows software.

    You can install & uninstall software from the command line and update everything installed through it with one command.

    It’s not a real package manager of course. It can’t update the operating system, and Windows applications aren’t built for modularity and shared libraries the way Linux applications are. But it does automate application management like nothing else. I highly recommend this if you use Windows.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s winget now too, which is the official Windows package manager. I’ve used it a couple of times now and worked as expected, not sure how it compares to chocolatey outside of simple app installs though.

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I love winget, at least for the initial installation. No more having to search the the download and click through a gui. Just one or two commands (two if searching for the id) and done.