cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17202407

Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) introduced a bill this week to legally erase transgender people, entitled the “Defining Male and Female Act of 2024.” He claimed that the bill will stop what he called the Biden administration’s attempt to “replace biological sex with dangerous radical gender ideology.”

The bill is a long list of terms and definitions, where words like “father” and “girl” are defined with the words “male” and “female.” Those two words are then defined as “an individual who naturally has, had, will have, or would have, but for a congenital anomaly or intentional or unintentional disruption, the reproductive system that at some point produces, transports and utilizes [sperm or eggs for male or female, respectively] for fertilization.”

  • RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    Not the dangerous radical gender ideology of trying to be happy

    Is there any argument for trans people getting their rights removed?

  • stembolts@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Setting aside the mind, it is a biological fact that approximately 1 in 1700 people are born with both sexual organs.

    They’re supposed to just, die?

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    We need media stepping up the messaging that the Right is infatuated with the genitals of people, especially children. Outside of maybe your Dr. (and/or partner), nobody should be talking about, or caring about your genitals to the degree the Right is in this pervy/pedo crusade of late.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Might as well define the Earth as flat and the Moon as green cheese while he’s at it.

    Do these fuckers have literally nothing else to do than wage wars against reality?

  • fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    14 hours ago

    We really need to start saying that these people want their own family members killed. It seems to be the only thing that can get some people to listen

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    of course I hate the active reduction of freedom. But may I ask, how important is this? Will trans people be able to continue to survive? Existing and being who you believe you are seems to be the important detail which pisses then off. They can’t do anything but be explicitly rude.

    Should someone decide to fight you for being trans, I will fight for + with you.

    Writing this comment mildly drunk, I’m sure there’s problems with it, but what if it’s like rain off a window, you look at it and ignore it?

    • Tiefling IRL
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      This is a precursor to them trying to sue trans people for “fraud” by having documents with the correct gender marker. Also, the cruelty is the point, and this is in itself cruel.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Cripes. The fuckin struggle just to survive never ends. I don’t get what people’s problem is, and at this point an convinced I never will. Fuck em.

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They can also force transgender people in institutional settings (prison, college, military, etc) to be housed with the wrong gender. That can be dangerous.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Dr Oz is a real doctor as well. Unfortunately medical school doesn’t prevent people from being delusional. Or giant assholes for that matter

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Aren’t doctors supposed to take an oath to do no harm? This will cause so much harm.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Technically, no. “Do no harm” was the motto of a 19th century French physician and later made its way into medical textbooks, but it is not found in the Hippocratic oath.

      • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Republican lawmakers only swear an oath to whomever is paying them the most.

        Edit: Democrats do it too, just not as obviously and not all of them. Until we get rid of corporate lobbying, we’ll be firmly in an oligarchy.