- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- europe@feddit.org
- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- europe@feddit.org
Do you have another news source that’s not a tabloid shitrag? Thanks.
The article is misleading. The official statement is that, because of our Nazi past, we have a special relationship with both the international Court of Justice and with Israel, so we’re just not going to formulate a decision until Netanyahu actually plans to visit Germany. In effect, this means that Netanyahu cannot visit Germany, because there is a non-zero chance of him getting arrested.
In a press conference, when repeatedly asked to clarify this statement, the speaker explained why this statement is so neutral once more and then said “I could get carried away, saying I find it hard to imagine that arrests might be carried out in Germany on this basis”.
So, it’s formulated as:
- his opinion
- that he’s explicitly saying, he’s not actually saying it,
- and after repeatedly pointing out that the official position is not that.