• Björn Tantau@swg-empire.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Apparently due to Indian regulations. I guess it cannot legally call itself a “hearing aid” without going through some kind of certification process.

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah the article mentioned that at some point. It still seems a bit petty to geofence it, instead of just calling it something else

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          I can actually forgive this one. A lot of medical devices regulations require that if you function as something or make it available, then you need to pass the certification for offering it.
          You can’t just relabel a device as something else if you clearly intend for it to be used as a medical device. Shady Bob’s emergency electrical heart massager isn’t going to fly.

          In the US, hearing aids required a prescription until 2022. What I can glean from translated sites is that India still has that requirement.

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Fun fact I learned waaay too late in my nursing career: if a patient has lost or damaged their amplifying hearing aid, you can put a stethoscope in their ears and talk into the bell.

    None of you will ever use this but I share it with everyone now because it’s really neat and I wish I knew it 10 years ago.

    • mxcory
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      My brother told me this. He said the disposable stethoscopes during COVID height were great for this.

      And I actually might as I intend to go EMS/EMS adjacent.