• fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    14 days ago

    If a functioning disability safety net means you get an occasional freeloader then that’s an acceptable price.

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I agree, it’s about trade-offs.

      That’s why my first statement was: I do not think many people would disagree with the title.

      • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        And then you say “oh but the freeloaders need to be refused”

        No shit, but it honestly just bites the nose to spite the face to even really give a shit about freeloaders. Have a basic vetting system and if someone is being an especially greedy asshole make an example. Trying too hard just hurts legitimate cases. Like anti piracy affects customers more than pirates.

        • iii@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Have a basic vetting system and if someone is being an especially greedy asshole make an example.

          That’s exactly what I’m argueing for, the example part not needed. Just weed them out.