• leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “recent calls from some allies …”

    Who? What allies? Could this be any more vague. The article gives no hints as to who these mysterious unnamed “allies” are and no evidence of anyone, donor or not, calling for her removal. Nor has Harris or anyone from her campaign so much as hinted of any plans or feelings of wanting to oust Khan. Other than Mark Cuban, all the tech bro/oligarch types are Trump allies, not Harris donors.

    Sounds like just another piece trying to stoke rumors and stir up division.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Neat theory-crafting but tbh idgaf who the current or next FTC Commissioner is as long as we avoid another Trump Admin. The worst case Harris outcomes don’t scare me in the slightest.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Keep Khan and ditch Harris if it comes to that.

    Shutup preemptively we’ll make it work with the power of wanting it really bad

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Frankly she’s already gone. Harris had way too many billionaire Tech Bros donors who are worried about being regulated in any way for her to keep what has been the best part of the Biden Administration by far.

    • BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      “Provoke a confirmation fight” that by itself makes me doubt she’s “already gone”. Maybe I’ll be proven wrong though.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I don’t see why you would need to provoke a confirmation fight if she doesn’t nominate her in the first place. Which is what I’m sure is going to happen.

      • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Of course he is.

        He’s not the bar we need to rate everybody against, though. Being better than Trump is not enough. Let’s hold our government to reasonable standards.

        • ImADifferentBird
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s the problem with the first-past-the-post voting system. It necessarily limits you to two choices, which frequently means you’re merely picking the one you dislike least.

            • ImADifferentBird
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Indeed.

              When the fascists have been driven out of the public sphere, we’re going to have to do something about that.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Democrats have no interest in driving the fascists from the public sphere. Without fascists, what would Democrats threaten us with every time we want better?

        • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          That requires a bar to hold the democrats too, and right now that bar is dolled up in orange spray paint and lieing on the floor somewhere. The issue for the modern america is to resolve the spoiler effect. Without a third party there is no “voting in favor” of someone there is “voting against” someone else.