Huh. Weird. Bezos’s face is different from how it used to be. He’s definitely gotten gender affirming surgery (testosterone or some cheek squaring plastic surgery)
World’s second most punchable face.
I would say third, after Donald and musk
Donnie’s got Il Duce face, which means it’s more kickable.
Lol. It wasn’t the “Washington Post” who decided that. It was the owner.
The number of subscriptions has gone down by 10% already. That’s what happens when billionaires interfere with media, apparently.
If literally nobody gives a shit about the endorsement then blocking it is a pointless gesture and not going to increase credibility with anyone by his own admission, Is what I would say if it wasn’t obviously another billionaire oligarch putting his finger on the scale of democracy then saying it isn’t or it’s justified.
If there are two parties, and one says it’s raining, and the other says it isn’t, it’s not the news media’s job to give an unbiased report on the debate, it’s their job to look out the fucking window and say whether or not it’s raining.
Tax your rich assholes America.
Been trying to I promise! Trouble is, the rich assholes took over the asylum
“Democracy dies with billionaires.”
Smells like an anti-editorial absolutist. Wow so objective. Much truth.
Wtf is wrong with being biased against out and proud fascists.
presidential endorsements create the “perception of bias”
You know what else creates a perception of bias? Meeting with Trump right before withholding the Harris endorsement.
Also… bullshit… it’s amazing how many people just get their marching instructions from their preferred newspaper. They don’t even pay attention. They will literally tell canvassers that they will decide who they are voting for based on what the paper says.
The Washington Post already carries a perception of bias for the Republican party, a Harris endorsement would have potentially balanced that somewhat.
This statement doesn’t even stand up to the flimsiest scrutiny
They don’t even pay attention. They will literally tell canvassers that they will decide who they are voting for based on what the paper says.
I had a conversation with my dad recently about it. he’s been a life long republican. In any case I had to remind him that I told him in 2016 that Trump was quoting hitler almost-verbatim. The only difference was that a) it was a more or less direct translation into english, and b) ‘jews’ were exchanged for ‘muslims’.
he also kept demanding sources and I’m like ‘the source is trump speaking. trump said that himself. this is a direct quote’. (for example the ‘Dictator on day one’ comment.) same goes for political violence. same goes for everything in the 2025;
like fucking hell, it’s exhausting. I tossed in the source on Fox being a right-wing propaganda rag for good measure.
When a conservative asks you for sources, they do so in bad faith. They don’t care about engaging with reality. It’s a deflection tactic.
Yup. That’s exactly why he’s voting for Harris this time around. All those bad faith arguments.
No, but it took a while to get him off Fox News. He didn’t vote in the 2020 presidential election either (or maybe he voted for some other republican jackass. I forget.)
He grew up thoroughly republican. It’s taken a while to break the brainwashing, but it can be done.
Fuck you, Jeff.
how exactly is it that any kind of endorsement creates a “perception of bias”? is he trying to argue that all opinions are biased? and if so, why doesn’t he say anything to support that claim?
So didn’t the crucial reporting of Woodward and Bernstein exposing the Watergate scandal on the pages of the Washington Post show bias against Nixon, Jeff? Would you have stopped that reporting had you owned the paper in 1972?
Yes
Now more than ever the world needs a credible, trusted, independent voice…
I’m not sure he understands the meaning of “independent”.
Or credible
Or trusted.
But he’s nailed “voice” at least though, right?
Fuck off Nazi, never another penny
