• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    2 months ago

    God it would be so fucking nice if “vote with your wallet” wasn’t literally impossible because so many fucking people are just apathetic and won’t leave…

    • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, the issue with vote with your wallet is that all of the people’s wallets combined are worth about 0 total votes compared to his and his friend’s wallets.

    • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly, except it’s true of all voting, since if just 80% of people voted, the Democratic Party would actually be left wing and have a supermajority in every branch of the government.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      That place only makes money from advertisers. It has lost something like 80% of them since he bought it. This is happening despite Twitter’s actual users still mostly hanging around.

      The advertisers are voting with their wallets; your wallet actually doesn’t apply here. Apathy of the users doesn’t apply here either. Musk continues to run the site the way he wants because, fuck it, who cares, he’s still richer than god. None of this matters to him.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    I imagine the solution, for his child at least, would be something like moving to a different platform and if the deadbeat follows, block him. Also, why would he need to change the block system to see her posts? As far as I’m aware, unless posts are made private, anyone can go to your account by creating another account if you’ve blocked them.

    • BougieBirdie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, but that requires him to go through effort to make a new account.

      It’s easier for him to tell someone else to strip features and make the platform worse than it already is

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    The best possible outcome here is that it drives more people off the platform. Frankly, I’m annoyed that so many people still use twitter. I’m in favor of anything that makes it less user-friendly.

  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    So I have a really really dumb question:

    As the owner of Twitter, who probably has access to the database directly, couldn’t he just get a database dump of his kids tweets?

    Or have a developer, oh I’m sorry, chatGPT develop an app just for him to be able to view all tweets?

    This seems like firing a nuke for something akin to a knife wound.

    • Kaja
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      He wouldn’t even need to do that. He could literally just make a third account (assuming his daughter is blocking the one where Elon pretends to be an actual child) and see all the posts he wants. This is truly Elon solving a problem only Elon has, by nuking a feature tons of folks use.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can just make a new account… it’s not like blocking someone stopped them from ever viewing your tweets again. Blocking was always just to stop viewing their tweets.

  • FundMECFSResearch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is the mute feature still there? Because if it isn’t we have a mass exodus on our hand. So many bad faith trolls on twitter since you can earn from engagement.