• girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    2 months ago

    Testing armed robot dogs in the Middle East instead of the US is pretty telling.

    Can’t be accidentally murdering Americans with a software glitch.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Which is wild when you add perspective using facts like the police in the US are less disciplined than troops overseas and tbe US still uses substances banned by the Geneva Convention on its civilian population. So if even the US wwon’t test it on their own people, it’s bad.

      • Jojo, Lady of the West
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Listen, the Geneva convention only specifies what we can’t use on enemies, okay? As long as the targets are technically friendlies, it’s fair game!

        • PapstJL4U@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          GC is for war and soldiers are combatants and not criminals by default (switching can happen easily). As an example Hollowpoint against criminals is okay as it can protect surrounding bystanders.

          It’s a bit weird, but for countries war is different from domestic problems.

    • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh it was already tremendously fucked. This is just gravy on top.

      Fuckin killbots. Coming soon to the 1033 program and thus, your local police department. The Boston Dynamics: Wardog!

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      We should never have moved away from sticks and stones tbh. Anything that works at long range makes people misunderstand what war is. War needs to look disgusting, because the more clean and automated it looks, the less horrible it looks to people spectacting it. But it is indeed just as horrible as beating someone to death with a rock.

        • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s happening anyway. We build them. Others build them in response because they have to. The sophistication of killbots will increase. Terrorists will get hold of them eventually. They’ll be hacked and turned on their handlers and/or civilians.

          All this is on top of ever increasing climate catastrophe. Look at Appalachia. The topography of those mountains was just rewritten. Whole towns erased like they were never there.

            • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              My first post was about letting the army fuck around and find out. Let the natural course of events remind them of those scifi movies they forgot about.

              • Strawberry
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                2 months ago

                They’re the ones fucking around, we’ll be the ones finding out

                • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Thousands at least. The more effective the killbots are the more money our war economy will throw at warbot R&D.

                  This is happening. Nothing on this planet can stop it.

    • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I remember some kinda skit about sci Fi authors writing about how bad a torture matrix would be ironically inspiring real people to create the torture matrix cause it’s the future.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Roston Bynamics was found to actually be Boston Dynamics with some 100mph tape slapped over the logo.

      • Warjac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I dunno, I’m subscribed to the BD YouTube channel and the very sudden change in facilities and upgrades to bots seems to be a little too in line with this. Like someone definitely caved in my opinion.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Without reading the article can I take a wild guess and say this is from “we promise never to make weaponized robots” Boston Dynamics?

    A promise from a corporation is just a lie by another name.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    dont worry first they test it where civil lives dont matter and once it passes some basic tests, they will become available for domestic (ab)use

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    So if a robot commits a war crime, they can just blame it on AI and call it a day, right? Sounds like an easy way to do whatever the fuck you want.

  • Mercuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Okay, but if it doesn’t say “You have thirty seconds to comply” before shooting someone then what’s the point?