NOTE: I only play correspondence chess. And this rating is correspondence chess. I don’t know what my elo rating would be in time controls. I have a disability that affects the mitochondria (energy production), and I’m unable to concentrate for a whole game so I play correspondence.

This game was pretty cool. I managed a centipawn loss of 19. And to win by +3 when my openent made 0 blunders (1 mistake, 3 inaccuracies), and I managed to scrape the game by with only a single inaccuracy (0 blunders, 0 mistakes).

I tend to spend a long time analysing moves and even take notes (which is allowed in correspondence chess), so perhaps my rating is more of an indication of the effort I put in than my true skill. But I’m quite proud nonetheless.

    • FundMECFSResearchOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      [Event “Rated correspondence game”] [Date “2024.09.26”] [Result “1-0”] [UTCDate “2024.09.26”] [UTCTime “12:28:43”] [Variant “Standard”] [TimeControl “-”] [ECO “D06”] [Opening “Queen’s Gambit Declined: Marshall Defense”] [Termination “Normal”]

      1. d4 d5 2. c4 Nf6 3. cxd5 Qxd5 4. Nc3 Qd8 5. Nf3 Bg4 6. Ne5 e6 7. f3 Bf5 8. e4 Bg6 9. Qb3 Qc8 10. Be3 Bd6 11. Nxg6 fxg6 12. e5 Bxe5 13. dxe5 Nd5 14. Nxd5 exd5 15. Qxd5 Nc6 16. Qb5 O-O 17. f4 Rb8 18. Qb3+ Kh8 19. Be2 Qd7 20. Rd1 Qe7 21. O-O h6 22. Bf3 Na5 23. Qc3 b6 24. Rf2 c5 25. g3 Rbc8 26. Be4 Qe6 27. b3 Nc6 28. Rd6 1-0
      • Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wow you kinda destroyed them in the opening. I’ve always heard that Nf6 is pretty horrible to play against the Queen’s Gambit declined.

        I ran your game though chess.com game review and it said you played with 91% accuracy while you’re opponent was 82.2. Congrats on your milestone!

        PS - I only play mostly correspondence as well and I’m around 1900 on lichess. Hit me up if you’d ever like a game sometime. My user name is lifecouch

        • FundMECFSResearchOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Cheers. I’ll message you on lemmy when I feel like starting a new game.

          Yeah I had heard of this aggressive line responding to Bg4 with Ne5 (which the engine treats as an innacuracy for white) that can be punished by black if they play perfectly but leads to some interesting lines and a few possible traps for white and I pulled one of them off haha. Can’t remember where I saw the trap, maybe a chessable course? or even a youtube short? but it worked out haha.